Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-01-2009, 10:43 AM   #1 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Lighter valve springs - an OEM efficiency tactic

I was sure this topic was discussed before, but couldn't turn it up in a search.

Anyone who's ever worked on a head for the first time may have been surprised at the amount of pressure valve springs exert on the cam. Try turning a lubricated cam in a head - there's an unexpected amount of resistance!

The idea of going with valve springs with less resistance was suggested - as something that would likely return a very small improvement in efficiency.

I happened across a reference that suggests using lighter springs is actually a tactic automakers have used to reduce fuel consumption:

Quote:
Pulling the engine from the Altima meant adopting some of that car's bias toward fuel economy, smoothness and torque. That's the excuse for a rev limiter that smacks you in the face on every shift. Super-light valve springs designed to get that last fraction of a mile from every gallon of gas mean no more revs until you buy 16 more springs and an ECU.
Source is a discussion of putting an Altima engine in a Sentra (and then building/tuning it for more power).

2002 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec-V - Sport Compact Car Magazine

Not that this is particularly useful info. How are you going to get lighter valve springs? Or decide "how light is too light?"

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-01-2009, 12:46 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
I suppose "too light" would be when the springs don't exert enough force to shut the valve completely before the next stroke. If for instance the intake valve isn't closed when the compression stroke starts, it'd shove some of the fuel/air back out the intake...
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 01:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,803

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 459 Times in 327 Posts
On old, very low-speed engines, you may find no valve springs at all. Air opens and closes the valve. The main job of the valve springs is to avoid "float" -they overcome the inertia of the valve and lifter and keep them in contact with the cam as they start to close. That force goes up as the square of speed, so it pays to avoid high revs. If you are going to lower the red-line, a cam with less dwell and overlap is better, as there is less inertia in the manifold gasses.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bicycle Bob For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-23-2015), Joggernot (11-25-2015), MobilOne (11-23-2015)
Old 02-01-2009, 01:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Macon,GA
Posts: 176

Ruint Taco - '19 Toyota Tacoma SR Double Cab
90 day: 23.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 124
Thanked 43 Times in 34 Posts
I think you are thinking of engines with no cam on the intake. Cylinder vacuum opens the intake and cylinder pressure closes it.

There are engines with no springs, cams open and close the valves. Ducatti is famous for there valves without a valve spring proper.

Ducati Desmo Valves


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicycle Bob View Post
On old, very low-speed engines, you may find no valve springs at all. Air opens and closes the valve. The main job of the valve springs is to avoid "float" -they overcome the inertia of the valve and lifter and keep them in contact with the cam as they start to close. That force goes up as the square of speed, so it pays to avoid high revs. If you are going to lower the red-line, a cam with less dwell and overlap is better, as there is less inertia in the manifold gasses.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vwbeamer For This Useful Post:
MobilOne (11-23-2015)
Old 02-01-2009, 02:45 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
Do any cars have valves closed by a mechanical linkage?

Like Ducati: Ducati.com || Bikes || Tech cafè
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 03:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,803

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 459 Times in 327 Posts
Mercedes sports-racing cars from the 50s had them, and perhaps a few other exotics. It would be nice to see that combined with variable valve timing. Perhaps hydraulic lifters plus hydraulic closers would cure the clearance woes.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bicycle Bob For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-23-2015)
Old 02-01-2009, 04:02 PM   #7 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I suppose "too light" would be when the springs don't exert enough force to shut the valve completely before the next stroke.
A particular problem on an interference engine. Snap, crackle, pop.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 04:03 PM   #8 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Here's a question: do valve springs get significantly weaker over time/use?

I happen to have a complete, worn out 1.0L engine...
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 04:56 PM   #9 (permalink)
Custom User Title
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bozeman, MT
Posts: 248

Daily Driver - '02 Pontiac Grand Prix SE
90 day: 18.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
most springs are just steel. Depending on the strength of the steel and the amount of flex they're under will determine the life before unacceptable margin of stress makes them un-useful. That is a very spring specific thing. BUT! The springs will most likely die long after piston rings or bearings fail. Diesels last what, 1-2-4 million miles? I don't work on industrial diesels, but I'm betting the springs in OTR trucks aren't ever replaced unless they are stretched or compressed out of spec.

A friend of mine does local deliveries, home every night; anyways, his truck just had its first serious engine service at 1 million miles. Sure it's had the weekly and monthly oil, fluids, leakdown etc tests, but never the engine cracked open. At the 1 mil mark they put new crank bearings in, new piston rings, new turbo seals, and put it back together (he's a car nut, so he asked the mech what was done). He says it runs a little stronger now, probably has slightly less friction and higher compression. Netted him about .3mpg more too.

Placibo? maybe, but the .3mpg is proof its running better. When you average 6.85mpg over 800 miles in a day, .3 is a huge savings.

Bottom line I'm saying: Steel springs last forever. Titanium lasts even longer (less pron to fatigue). Go with lighter springs if you want slightly better FE, but keep the rpms down to prevent valve float. Don't want any head crashes...
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 05:28 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,803

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 459 Times in 327 Posts
Steel springs are run below their fatigue limit, but only became really reliable after shot-peening became common. That was the secret of Toledo swords, too, BTW. Anyway, if you were to have your springs etched down, you could get any strength you want, and the loss of the surface treatment would probably be compensated by the reduction in strain, if the change is substantial. Springs, valve train weight, RPM and lobe shape all interact. The reduced duration on an XFI cam gives it a peakier lobe, even with less lift, so the need for spring strength is not reduced along with the power band. If you are willing to be religious about a low red-line, there are definite gains available, though.

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bicycle Bob For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-23-2015), MobilOne (11-23-2015)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Honda IACV explained TomO Off-Topic Tech 16 12-21-2015 01:49 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com