02-03-2012, 09:07 PM
|
#201 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 179
Thanks: 5
Thanked 39 Times in 23 Posts
|
No, COCyclist, that's very much in the box, circa 1957. Back in The Day, endurance racers used rigid tonneaus and wrap-around windshield for the driver and a...thingie I can't name behind the driver's head (I've heard "head fairing" but that sounds a bit modern).
Here's a youtube video of a Lotus 11 set up thusly:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&fe...&v=ODMqDhnwUDw
However a hardtop version (I know the Geo you mean--it was blue and had sort of a basket handle on the passenger side of the car) would be pretty original, all right. I'll have to scout up that Metro for pix of how he did the windshield. Any clues?
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-04-2012, 10:13 AM
|
#202 (permalink)
|
Aero Wannabe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738
Thanks: 705
Thanked 219 Times in 170 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackMcCornack
(I know the Geo you mean--it was blue and had sort of a basket handle on the passenger side of the car) would be pretty original, all right. I'll have to scout up that Metro for pix of how he did the windshield. Any clues?
|
We are thinking of the same one. I may hunt around too. IIRC it looked like he used the Metro windshield cut down and narrowed. He would have had pillars, glass and a roof to start with. You would be starting from scratch.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
|
Last edited by COcyclist; 02-04-2012 at 10:50 AM..
|
|
|
02-04-2012, 10:47 AM
|
#203 (permalink)
|
Aero Wannabe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738
Thanks: 705
Thanked 219 Times in 170 Posts
|
This one?
Modified Metro XFi: throwing convention to the wind - MetroMPG.com
Perhaps an Ecomodder member with better photochop skills can splice a photo into this thread.
Cool video of the Lotus. As it races around the track it sure looks more slippery than the sedans racing with it, clearly less frontal area.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
|
|
|
|
02-05-2012, 04:30 PM
|
#204 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 96
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
I've heard "headrest fairing". Personally I would like to be able to carry a friend when needed. a tonneau over passenger seat will really cramp them, but for single person would work much better when nobody else is on board. Oh, the dilemma. I've heard of ways to cut down glass windshields using wet saws, or sand blasting. I've eyeballed home built aircraft canopy's also. Not sure how they would work with rain and grime on the road tho.
My girlfriend says the Eleven looks too much like a catfish. The Vetter motorcycle fairing = a guppy. Need to work on "looks like a dolphin." everybody likes dolphins.
|
|
|
02-05-2012, 04:32 PM
|
#205 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
The thing about tonneaus is they snap on and off easily and we all know that the bulk of motoring around is done solo. For the occasion of having a passenger- unsnap the tonneau. When it's also nice out.
|
|
|
02-05-2012, 04:58 PM
|
#206 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 96
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
that's what sucks where I live. It's either raining cold or too dang hot. Nice weather lasts about 5 minutes then its the other extremes. :-(
|
|
|
02-05-2012, 05:29 PM
|
#207 (permalink)
|
Gen II Prianista
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ballamer, Merlin
Posts: 453
Thanks: 201
Thanked 146 Times in 89 Posts
|
Re: the Lotus 11.
Bodywork approximates half-length wheel skirts front and rear.
You still have to get at those spinners to change tires/tyres.
Better aero means higher speeds, forget any FE increase:
|
|
|
02-05-2012, 05:40 PM
|
#208 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 96
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rokeby
Better aero means higher speeds, forget any FE increase:
|
Lotus Eleven = 40mpg racing a Le Mons in the 50's. versus 6mpg for my early 80's vintage Formula Ford 1600. Only thing better is the Opal eco-speedster at 113mpg. Oh, isn't the eco-speedster based on the Lotus Elise chassis? $$,$$$
|
|
|
02-10-2012, 02:54 AM
|
#209 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
|
I have a hard time believing any ICE car could acheive 40mpg at LeMans. When my '92 Probe 4 cyl can barely sustain that at a steady state how is a 50 year old race car going to get that?
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
|
|
|
02-10-2012, 05:08 AM
|
#210 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7
I have a hard time believing any ICE car could acheive 40mpg at LeMans. When my '92 Probe 4 cyl can barely sustain that at a steady state how is a 50 year old race car going to get that?
|
Super aero, tiny (but good) engine and weighing less than the contents of your Probe's glovebox
the MOTOR test report
Quote:
RECORDING a maximum speed of 125 m.p.h., as an average of timed two-way runs with a passenger as well as a driver being carried, the Lotus XI provides a vivid illustration of the huge gain in small sports car performance which has taken place during the past decade. Able to accelerate the same two-man load from a standstill to 100 m.p.h. in only 23.6 seconds, this car invites incredulity as to its modest 1,096 c.c. engine size, until almost equally miraculous fuel economy figures (which range from 32 1/2 m.p.g. at a sustained 100 m.p.h. to 55 1/2 m.p.g. at a steady 40 m.p.h. on the level) are also observed.
|
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Arragonis For This Useful Post:
|
|
|