10-18-2009, 10:42 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Mythbusters "tests" efficiency of dimples vs. smooth, and clean vs. muddy car
Admin note: 2 threads were started on this topic. The other one is here: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...les-10718.html
---
I don't watch the show regularly, but this one might be worth tuning in for the entertainment factor.
Also.. don't they have it backward? Isn't the common myth that the clean car gets better mileage?
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
10-18-2009, 11:50 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
aero guerrilla
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,753
Thanks: 1,340
Thanked 751 Times in 477 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Also.. don't they have it backward? Isn't the common myth that the clean car gets better mileage?
|
Hmm, I can imagine having enough mud buildup in the wheelwells to reduce the distance between them and the wheels. Or mud sticking to the rear of the car, drying and hardening, layer on layer, in the shape of a Kammback extension. But by the time either of these would have a noticeable aero effect, the weight penalty would start to be a pain.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be
What matters is where you're going, not how fast.
"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell
[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
|
|
|
|
|
10-18-2009, 02:53 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wheeling, WV
Posts: 410
Thanks: 12
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
|
I will be watching it. I love mythbusters even tho they seem to be obsesed with explosions.
|
|
|
|
|
10-18-2009, 03:50 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Ecomod noob
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tooele, UT
Posts: 412
ZJ - '95 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo Upcountry 90 day: 20.57 mpg (US) Neon - '03 Dodge Neon SE 90 day: 33.46 mpg (US) S'Crew - '02 Ford F150 Supercrew XLT 90 day: 16.4 mpg (US) Ranger - '90 Ford Ranger Last 3: 28.02 mpg (US) Not the Jeep - '03 Dodge Neon SE 90 day: 34.11 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by igo
I will be watching it. I love mythbusters even tho they seem to be obsesed with explosions.
|
I love Mythbusters BECAUSE they seem to be obsesed with explosions... hehehee
__________________
When it comes to Heroes, RENEGADES are mine!
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to zjrog For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-18-2009, 04:04 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Wet Coast, Kanuckistan.
Posts: 1,275
Thanks: 100
Thanked 306 Times in 178 Posts
|
I think the muddy/clean thing is like the golfball dimple theory. Sometimes rough is better than smooth. I'm actually looking forward to this one...
If it works you could cover your car with rocker guard or ceiling texture and paint over it. Might look kind of cool.
__________________
Vortex generators are old tech. My new and improved vortex alternators are unstoppable.
"It’s easy to explain how rockets work but explaining the aerodynamics of a wing takes a rocket scientist.
|
|
|
|
|
10-18-2009, 05:04 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
|
They are supposed to be "dimpling" a car, I think.
|
|
|
|
|
10-18-2009, 05:32 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Wet Coast, Kanuckistan.
Posts: 1,275
Thanks: 100
Thanked 306 Times in 178 Posts
|
I could just see them firing golf balls at a car to get the dimples.
|
|
|
|
|
10-18-2009, 05:35 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 204
Thanks: 1
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
|
SOunds like a hail storm car to me! 
Dave |
|
|
|
|
10-18-2009, 09:46 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Left Lane Ecodriver
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
|
I'm sure it'll be entertaining and worth watching.
I predict their conclusion will be "we can not detect a fuel economy difference between these two cars".
It would take a pretty extreme setup to do aerodynamic testing sensitive enough to detect mud. A wind tunnel would do it, but they wouldn't take a car to a wind tunnel for a simple myth like this. Short of that, you'd need high speed bidirectional coastdown testing on a totally windless day. Even if you accounted for airspeed, small crosswinds would skew your results beyond utility.
As to the effects of mud: It tends to increase the car's frontal area, obviously. Cakes of mud on streamlined surfaces will increase your Cd, while cakes of mud in your eddies will tend to decrease your Cd. A muddy truck with its panel gaps and hood cowl filled with mud will probably get better gas mileage, but unless your aeromodded Metro gets a teardrop-shaped tail made of mud, it's likely to get slightly worse gas mileage when muddy.
|
|
|
|
|
10-18-2009, 09:47 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
I don't watch the show regularly, but this one might be worth tuning in for the entertainment factor.
Also.. don't they have it backward? Isn't the common myth that the clean car gets better mileage?
|
New myth - it stems from the golf ball conundrum.
I can't imagine what type of thoughtless people frequent the MB forums to come up with/perpetuate this ****.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
|
|
