Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-13-2009, 03:09 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: southern ontario, canada
Posts: 10

Zippy - '06 WAVE 5DR
90 day: 38.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Premium vs. Regular

Anyone have any gains using premium vs. regular gasoline? I've been using Shell V-Power and i seem to get a 10% gain in efficiency.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 04:02 PM   #2 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,724

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 459 Times in 315 Posts
thebluelightbulb -

I use (mostly) Chevron 91 Octane. However, I have a Hot-Air-Intake, so the premium fuel is insurance HAI (hot-air-intake => lean-burn => higher octane is better to avoid knocking/pinging). Here are threads on same :

Regular vs. Premium
Fuel Grades

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 08:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
Hi-Tech Redneck
 
Johnny Mullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ashtabula, Ohio
Posts: 1,411

Christine - '98 Metro Base
90 day: 62.59 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 32 Times in 27 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Johnny Mullet Send a message via MSN to Johnny Mullet
I use premium fuel and get better performance/mileage from it.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 09:25 PM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,538

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,021 Times in 569 Posts
Call me skeptical, but I'd like to see a controlled test.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 09:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 801
Thanks: 46
Thanked 81 Times in 63 Posts
I think this is another one of those areas where "it depends" on a lot of factors. Engine design, engine management system (e.g. how exactly it reacts to pinging), driving style (P&G puts my car into the regime where it may knock/ping depending on other conditions), ambient temps, and on and on and on.

One thing is for sure: Over the long term, pinging is very bad for your engine.

The best way to tell if premium fuel helps is to do an instrumented test. Or, rather, a whole lot of instrumented testing. If it does help, then you get to figure out if the MPG difference makes up for the $$ difference or not.

BTW, in my car it doesn't seem to make any difference for MPG. But it does keep the car from pinging in the "worst" of circumstances--where it will with regular-grade. (And the tendency to ping appears to vary from fill to fill as well, even when using the same grade of fuel from the same station.)

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 09:39 PM   #6 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,384

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 957
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
Put some more E85 in your diet.
__________________
"żʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 08:56 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: southern ontario, canada
Posts: 10

Zippy - '06 WAVE 5DR
90 day: 38.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
morning,

it seems there is a wide variety of critisism regarding this. i'll go through another tank and see if there are any gains. chances are that i will to back to #87 just because a 10% gain in efficiency cancels out the cost of premium which is 10 to 15% higher than #87 in my neighbourhood. i have found that different brands of premium give me different results. Shell V-Power gives me the greatest gain while Crappy Tire #91 must be full of ethanol, not giving me the required boost for my test. too bad i don't have a dyno and a fuel monitor. that would give me the best test.

...thebluelightbulb...
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 10:08 AM   #8 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,538

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,021 Times in 569 Posts
Unfortunately, tank to tank testing of anything is an exercise in futility for the vast majority of drivers (whose normal variation, absent any changes at all, is large). Far too many variables to possibly isolate just one as the cause of any change.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 12:30 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
wagonman76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,006

Red Car - '89 Celebrity CL 4 door
Team Chevy
90 day: 36.47 mpg (US)

Winter Wagon - '89 6000 LE Wagon
90 day: 28.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Only time I noticed a difference with premium was with the old 6000 wagon when towing a trailer. With over 200k on the engine, the premium stopped the pinging and restored some of the lost power when climbing hills, so I would make it a point to use premium when towing. If I didn't have it, I could really tell the difference. Other than that, never noticed a difference. Tried it for a couple tanks in the Celeb once but never noticed a difference in performance or mpg.
__________________

Winter daily driver, parked most days right now


Summer daily driver
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 03:12 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: southern ontario, canada
Posts: 10

Zippy - '06 WAVE 5DR
90 day: 38.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
since there is a marginal or no increase in efficency compared to cost, i'll just use good ol' #87. i'll use premium only if i really need to do so.

thanks for the advice everyone!
...thebluelightbulb...


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mercedes modded C-class: Cd 0.25. Up 7.5 mpg over regular model (with other mods). MetroMPG Aerodynamics 19 07-19-2009 02:58 PM
increasing compression, running on regular gas? Southcross EcoModding Central 33 04-09-2009 01:37 PM
My introduction to hypermiling the Smart Ptero Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 12 10-28-2008 07:32 PM
Regular vs. Premium Tango Charlie General Efficiency Discussion 17 06-19-2008 05:19 PM
GAS is 4.50 for Regular in Los Angeles dsq EcoModding Central 10 06-06-2008 03:11 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com