Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-24-2009, 06:45 PM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
doviatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 388

Grey Goose (Retired) - '89 Geo Metro LSI 4 door hatch back
Last 3: 57.16 mpg (US)

Tweety - '91 Geo Metro Convertible -2 Door convertible LSI
Team Metro
90 day: 43.97 mpg (US)

Shadow - '02 Honda Shadow VT1100
90 day: 43.46 mpg (US)

Sonic - '07 Honda CBR1000RR
90 day: 42.69 mpg (US)

Filmore - '84 Volkswagen Vanagon
90 day: 20.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 47
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
I really doubt you are getting separation. Even if your are drag would be significantly smaller than your wake. If in doubt tape some tufts to the roof and run a video or snap some pictures while driving (from a chase vehicle). Post these real data points. That would tell the whole story and remove the speculation. Other Jeep drivers would love to see this kind of data.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-24-2009, 06:48 PM   #22 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
It may not actually be that difficult to mount my 2.4ghz camera to the roof and record from that with a laptop and tv tuner. I have a pair of Thule rails that came with the Jeep, that would be good for mounting a camera too, but they might have too much influence on the airflow themselves
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 06:54 PM   #23 (permalink)
Boxhead
 
whokilledthejams's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredonia, NY
Posts: 322

Boxy Brown - '04 Scion xB
90 day: 35.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to whokilledthejams
Driving a rectangle as I do, I've thought about this. I figure, I could get more bang for my buck, particularly at higher speeds, if I had a modest single-wheel teardrop trailer (it can be towed much closer to the car than a conventional trailer). You might consider the same.

Of course, I'd have to actually acquire/build one to try it out, but anecdotal evidence suggests that a teardrop behind a brick helps quite a bit.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 06:59 PM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
doviatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 388

Grey Goose (Retired) - '89 Geo Metro LSI 4 door hatch back
Last 3: 57.16 mpg (US)

Tweety - '91 Geo Metro Convertible -2 Door convertible LSI
Team Metro
90 day: 43.97 mpg (US)

Shadow - '02 Honda Shadow VT1100
90 day: 43.46 mpg (US)

Sonic - '07 Honda CBR1000RR
90 day: 42.69 mpg (US)

Filmore - '84 Volkswagen Vanagon
90 day: 20.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 47
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis View Post
It may not actually be that difficult to mount my 2.4ghz camera to the roof and record from that with a laptop and tv tuner. I have a pair of Thule rails that came with the Jeep, that would be good for mounting a camera too, but they might have too much influence on the airflow themselves
Mounting the camera behind the area being tested will be unobtrusive. Mount it on the rail half way back pointing towards the front. tape the tufts on the leading edge of window and back along the top.

Edit: Oh sorry, you said rails influence testing.... Yes, they will. Do the test in the middle of the roof between the rails.
Grab a friend with a hand held video and they can drive along side and behind. Or you could shoot the video since you know what you are looking for.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 08:26 PM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by doviatt View Post
Mounting the camera behind the area being tested will be unobtrusive. Mount it on the rail half way back pointing towards the front. tape the tufts on the leading edge of window and back along the top.

Edit: Oh sorry, you said rails influence testing.... Yes, they will. Do the test in the middle of the roof between the rails.
Grab a friend with a hand held video and they can drive along side and behind. Or you could shoot the video since you know what you are looking for.
I meant the rails going across the roof. They're square section, not aerodynamic like the stock type
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 07:37 PM   #26 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
Look what robertwb70 posted in another thread.. exactly what I'm talking about
Aerodynamic Teardrop Trailer

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 04:20 PM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,909
Thanks: 23,994
Thanked 7,227 Times in 4,654 Posts
roof

Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis View Post
Look what robertwb70 posted in another thread.. exactly what I'm talking about
Aerodynamic Teardrop Trailer

I think they are lowering both the leading and trailing edges rather than raising the roofline.Daimler-Benz is too smart to believe adding frontal area could benefit drag.Trailer flow is typically fully attached with conventional trailer design.Their 95-square-foot wake is the issue which lowering would address.------------ PS "teardrop" is used out of context,as in a real teardrop form,the sides would be converging in direct proportion to the drop of the roof.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 05:16 PM   #28 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Uk
Posts: 17
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
I think they are lowering both the leading and trailing edges rather than raising the roofline.Daimler-Benz is too smart to believe adding frontal area could benefit drag.
I the UK retail giant Marks & Spencer is using these trailers and they have the same leading and trailing heights as normal ones, they just hump up in the centre.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dieselman For This Useful Post:
aerohead (04-23-2011)
Old 08-22-2009, 07:24 PM   #29 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
They claim that the trailers can carry 16% more over standard trailers. This seems to suggest that they actually just added a hump, versus lower the trailing edges*.
I love the look of those trailers. It looks like the future is finally becoming a reality - overseas at least.

This sort of mod would be super easy to test out on an SUV - just get a large piece of cardboard and stick it on your roof. The roof rack would actually be useful since you could strap it to it.
A couple of hours of time, and a roll of tape could get it done.

It seems to me that even though something like this would add frontal area, it would reduce turbulence that might cancel out its effects. The wake would be smaller down wind since the air would be driven downwards .... ( right ? )


* Edit : 10 % not 16 %. 16 % was the fuel savings.

Last edited by Cd; 08-22-2009 at 11:47 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
aerohead (04-23-2011), horbi (10-07-2009)
Old 08-22-2009, 10:21 PM   #30 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
I think they are lowering both the leading and trailing edges rather than raising the roofline.Daimler-Benz is too smart to believe adding frontal area could benefit drag.Trailer flow is typically fully attached with conventional trailer design.Their 95-square-foot wake is the issue which lowering would address.------------ PS "teardrop" is used out of context,as in a real teardrop form,the sides would be converging in direct proportion to the drop of the roof.
Air coming off the top of the windshield, or the fairing on a truck, would fan out anyway, creating an effectively larger frontal area. Something like this would just fill the low pressure bubble and let the air reattach, or stay attached.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Roof rack test: quantifying the aero penalty MetroMPG Aerodynamics 30 02-10-2023 08:18 PM
Commercially produced aerodynamic pickup bed cap MetroMPG Aerodynamics 636 01-09-2022 06:21 PM
Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete) MetroMPG Aerodynamics 31 05-20-2010 12:23 PM
weird rain flow patterns on roof lunarhighway Aerodynamics 5 07-08-2008 10:16 AM
Strange OEM Aerodynamic Shape (longitudinal roof indents) LostCause Aerodynamics 17 03-19-2008 11:26 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com