Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-03-2013, 04:03 PM   #41 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: White, GA
Posts: 36

Knightrun - '08 Ford Mustang GT
90 day: 31.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Hmm... I wonder if I could rig up something that heated the fuel lines in my Ural? Maybe insert a metal pipe inline with the hose and wrap it with heated wire? As primitive as the engines are, I imagine any little trick would be of help.

~SM

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-03-2013, 04:22 PM   #42 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,631

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 702 Times in 445 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Quote:
If you haven't seen Gashole...You really should.
I found it rather retarded. Coincidentally, i got 54MPG on a 10mile trip over to a friend today. And this, despite having Big oil conspiracy devices like fuel injectors and a catalytic converter in the car.
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 09:44 PM   #43 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 668 Times in 357 Posts
Hate to rain on your parade, but you need to look at this here graphic.

Graphic

Now looking at this, it seems that we lose 3% in combustion inefficiency, not sure how improving this is going to "Double" yer mileage. Is there some other part of the equation that this can help with?

Always amazed how people try to improve the 97% part of the equation and ignore the 30% thing.

Call me when you get an answer for the 70% thermal loss issue. You could triple mileage.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 10:14 PM   #44 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenlord View Post
Thanks Frank. When I get my custom vapor system installed, I'll fill you guys in on all the details and results...carefully though, because I don't want to wake up with a horses head in my bed from the Evil Overlords at Big Oil inc. If you haven't seen Gashole...You really should. I loved it!
The vapor carburator already exists.
Ever hear of a propane carburator?

There is no way you are going to be able to vaporize gasoline better than propane or natural gas. Funny thing is when you compair gasoline to propane or natural gas sometimes the propane or natural gas beates the gasoline engine by a few % on a BTU per mile basis.
In other words, if you can fully vaporize the fuel the best result you can hope for is one that is barely measureable.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 10:19 PM   #45 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
I found it rather retarded. Coincidentally, i got 54MPG on a 10mile trip over to a friend today. And this, despite having Big oil conspiracy devices like fuel injectors and a catalytic converter in the car.
Do you have any examples?
Was it full of far out pipe dream ideas like water injecting vapor carbs?

I will stick with improving aerodynamics, reducing engine pumping losses, removing and reducing accessory loads and putting waste heat in the exhaust to work (turboing a diesel).
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 09:16 AM   #46 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Gashole could have been an informative and motivational film but because of all the half-truths and obfuscation it is easy to dismiss the film's message entirely. I give it a D-; one notch above FAIL.

Finally watched "Who killed the electric car"- what a contrast! Logical presentation, absence of hocus pocus and B.S. Now I hate GM more than ever.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 04-04-2013 at 12:03 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 06:25 PM   #47 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 46

Weird Thing - '00 Holden (GM) Commodore SS Series II
90 day: 18.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I once had a car modified with a cold vapor setup. We got the car to run with the carb turned off via a tap in the fuel line. The fuel line was clear and we could literally see the car run on invisible gas.

Car went from a best of around 38mpg at 60mph highway cruising to 54mpg on vapor but the speed could not exceed 50mph and you needed to take a packed lunch and a book to read while it got up to that speed. It was so pathetically gutless we took it off. As for trying to combine both fuel systems - it just ran rich. EFI and a tunable computer would fix that but at the end of the day no magic here - and no big gains without an equally big downside.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com