Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com - View Single Post

RH77 · 05-15-2009, 02:42 AM

Hey Adam, Welcome to EM (from a local).

If you don't do any off-roading, a belly pan is a great idea. I had a chance to see the new F-150 chassis at the Dearborn (Rouge) assembly plant when production began. It definitely needs an undercarriage treatment for optimal FE, but the customer usage concern was obvious. The most benefit is down low for now -- the wiper area is minimal, but every little bit counts.

Any feedback devices available, like the ScanGauge. It's a good driving coach.

On that note, any plans for lowering the vehicle? That could easily reduce the airflow on the down-low. Otherwise, you have a lot of weight to start and keep going.

Best FE to you...

RH77

05-15-2009, 02:42 AM	#6 (permalink)
RH77 Depends on the Day Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Kansas City Area Posts: 1,761 Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS Sports Cars 90 day: 32.74 mpg (US) IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX Team Honda 90 day: 34.76 mpg (US) Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base 90 day: 28.2 mpg (US) Thanks: 31 Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts	Hey Adam, Welcome to EM (from a local). If you don't do any off-roading, a belly pan is a great idea. I had a chance to see the new F-150 chassis at the Dearborn (Rouge) assembly plant when production began. It definitely needs an undercarriage treatment for optimal FE, but the customer usage concern was obvious. The most benefit is down low for now -- the wiper area is minimal, but every little bit counts. Any feedback devices available, like the ScanGauge. It's a good driving coach. On that note, any plans for lowering the vehicle? That could easily reduce the airflow on the down-low. Otherwise, you have a lot of weight to start and keep going. Best FE to you... RH77 __________________ *“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research” ― Albert Einstein* _ _