Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille
I'm still curious how speed or red lights cameras hinder civil liberties.
|
First, they can violate personal privacy. Many jurisdictions must have the photo of the driver in case someone borrows your car, etc. This could be interpreted as entrapment. It's a complicated argument that can be best made by someone more familiar with the spirit of our laws.
The best I can describe it, is the "society" taking advantage of the individual. Many small towns, all the way up to the Federal Government, has become corrupt in many aspects, and abuse of these cameras is one fundamental example.
This is why many States have banned their usage.
I think it may come down to the differences of interpretation of freedom and liberties between U.S. and Canadian citizens. For me, it comes down to, "I agree with their use, but Constitutionally speaking, I have to sacrifice that preference for what is intended for the Nation by the Framers". It may be perfectly acceptable in your culture.
I watch CBC's "National" news from time-to-time, to get another perspective. From what I can tell from the news, as a frequent visitor to Canada, and just by speaking with those that live there, I would not have a problem with the cameras under your jurisdiction as a visitor or resident. There are many facets of more responsible governing and a different view of the spirit of Canadian Confederation.
RH77