What do I think the sun would do if there was an increase in cold dust around the star. Pretty much this:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/spa...-polar-vortex/
The forum needs flood aka aerohead control. I think the part about laws of science being wrong fried a circuit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
You're all aware that solar x-ray emission does nothing to us on Earth?
|
Yeah that's been proven wrong. But if you feel it's true and insist on believing it be my guest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
And everyone's aware that sunspots have very little to do with total solar irradiance?
|
Like a broken clock.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
I'll go with accepted scientific theory, until it is eclipsed by a newly-proven hypothesis which superannuates it.
|
There lies the problem. You don't question anything.
Then riddle me this for example why do we continue to say "current follows the path of lease resistance"? It's clearly wrong, it's easy to prove it's wrong and yet no one says anything or tries to correct it. We don't need a new hypnosis, just need to fix what we already have.
If we can't get the basic stuff right how can we expect people to make any kind theory or law that's even close to reality for more complicated phenomena?
This is clearly a post for science plebs and rubes. You are clearly so far ahead on so many levels, every way possible, why waist you time?
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
Last edited by oil pan 4; 02-10-2023 at 05:16 PM..
|