Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2012, 01:18 PM   #31 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 44.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5speed5 View Post
Based on that, I'm guessing a 2WD reg-cab Colorado (or GMC Canyon) with 4-cyl (2.8L) could come very close to 40 mpg. The S-10 should be similar.
I think I could get my truck to a 40 MPG average in the summer if I:
Air dam
Belly pan
LRR tires at about 50 PSI
3.42 rear axle ratio
Wheel covers
P&G as appropriate

With all of the above plus a good, efficient turbodiesel of about 150 HP, I think 50 MPG might be possible in the summer.

__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-10-2012, 01:24 PM   #32 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
Not many people "need" the ground clearance, either. How many people do you know that actually go two-tracking?
What do you mean by "know"? Most of my friends & neighbors, certainly. I expect there are also some differences in road conditions between Michigan and the Northern Nevada/Northeastern California area where I live. Perhaps I need to take some pictures...

Quote:
A Subaru Outback will do that.
Maybe, though I've seen Jeeps high-centered on some of the roads I drive. But if you're using it as a daily driver, you're still getting not very good mpg, while not having much load-carrying capability. (By load, I mean 6-foot pine logs piled in the bed, and either about the same load in a trailer, or hauled down a slope that I needed 4WD with chains to get up.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 01:41 PM   #33 (permalink)
The road not so traveled
 
TheEnemy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 680

The Truck - '99 Nissan Frontier xe
90 day: 25.74 mpg (US)

The Ugly Duck - '84 Jeep CJ7 Rock crawler
Thanks: 18
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
Not many people "need" the ground clearance, either. How many people do you know that actually go two-tracking? A Subaru Outback will do that.

I just don't buy the argument for the pickup as anything but a lifestyle vehicle.
Me.

<---- The picture to the left needed more ground clearance than an Outback has, well maybe not, I have gone down roads that left a significant impression on the undercariage. If you look closely at the tailgate you will notice its missing quite a bit of paint. The rest of the bed is pretty beat up too.

Edit to add: I guess if you consider the fact that I like to go offroading (two tracking) hiking and camping away from other people and that being one of the primary reasons I got the truck and the Jeep then yeah it still falls under a lifestyle choice.

Last edited by TheEnemy; 05-10-2012 at 02:01 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 03:20 PM   #34 (permalink)
EcoModding Jack
 
nimblemotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 335
Thanks: 12
Thanked 58 Times in 40 Posts
Sweet! My dad did the same thing with his '52 Ford, although he made both the front and back of the trailer the trunk, so he pulled TWO '52 ford trunks as his trailer for car shows. Might have a pic somewhere, it was in a book..

Quote:
Originally Posted by wagonef8 View Post
Here is Wagon from hondacivicwagon.com I also have a hitch on my wagon and building a trailer from a parts crx I bought

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 06:22 PM   #35 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldlobo View Post
i question weather the 1.7 isuzu diesel will bolt up to the north american gm metric pattern.

i know the s10 was sold with a isuzu 2.2l diesel.
It's the GM corporate small pattern, same as the 2.2 diesel. I actually forgot about that motor, though. The 1.7 came in non-VW Chevettes. At some point, IIRC, they were using VW engines in them. Unless that was the Omni. Can't recall.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 02:57 AM   #36 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: winterpeg, manisnowba
Posts: 211

clank - '99 jeep tj sport
90 day: 17.32 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
isuzu 1.8l was in the chevettes; no vw diesels, omni is a more likely choice. Besides they probably won't pass emissions if you put them in something newer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 04:52 PM   #37 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldlobo View Post
isuzu 1.8l was in the chevettes; no vw diesels, omni is a more likely choice. Besides they probably won't pass emissions if you put them in something newer.
1. Provided you actually have to pass emissions testing. I don't.

2. No diesel swap that wasn't included as an original option will pass emissions specifications. The EPA doesn't allow engine swaps that weren't in original configuration, regardless of the benefits of doing so.

3. Now I have to find out what came with a 1.7 Diesel from Isuzu. :/
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 05:40 PM   #38 (permalink)
NightKnight
 
NachtRitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,594

RippinRoo - '05 Subaru Legacy Wagon 2.5 GT
Subaru
90 day: 21.16 mpg (US)

Helga - '00 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
Diesel
90 day: 53.91 mpg (US)

Olga - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon
90 day: 46.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 303
Thanked 311 Times in 186 Posts
The OP is mysteriously absent in this discussion...

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012, 10:43 AM   #39 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NachtRitter View Post
The OP is mysteriously absent in this discussion...
Maybe a bit disappointed that even we see it as a severe challenge ?

I'd love to be proven wrong, but realistically, it ain't going to happen.
He might get 50mpg running with just the truck, but what when he starts using the truck for its intended purpose - hauling stuff ?

It's not going to take some ecomods, or some hypermiling tips - it's going to take just about all of them.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012, 04:40 PM   #40 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 18.97 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
I was doing some number crunching with 4 cylinder turbo diesels a year ago and figured on 40+ mpg in the truck. I was using the factory gal/hr ratings for half load and full load, at full rpm. At full load doing 60 mph, it would get about 30 mpg and at half load it would be around 50 mpg. I figured on 40 as the average.

I was looking at deutz, cummins, cat, and some others at the time. Most of the 4 cylinders seem to use about 2.5 gallons per hour at full load/max rpm. Not bad for a truck......

__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
50mpg, briggs, ranger, s-10, truck





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com