Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2009, 12:34 AM   #41 (permalink)
Grrr :-)
 
Nerys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Levittown PA
Posts: 800

Cherokee - '88 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 19.44 mpg (US)

Ryo-Ohki - '94 Geo Metro Xfi
90 day: 50.15 mpg (US)

Vger 2 - '00 Plymouth Grand Voyager SE

Ninja - '89 Geo Tracker
90 day: 30.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
well I am curious. 92 pounds of lift. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN.

if sticking 100 pounds of sand in your trunk can improve snow handling would not removing 100 pounds have a similar opposite effect? (I really don't know)

I wanted to say but I have felt the "gusts" give me a good solid shove on the highway but then I thought well its not the same thing. one is blunt drag wind hitting the side of your car. How many pounds of force is that?

I have SEEN gusting winds MOVE a 12,000 pound RV. Right in my driveway. I measured it. Moved the thing 17 inches sideways (no joke) but was that lift or just brute force SHOVE into the side (I am guessing brute force shove on that one)

it would be interesting to figure this kind of stuff out but I certainly do not possess the skill or inclination to do it :-)

Frank I agree 99.99999999% of spoilers are PURELY for looks.

but I swear I read somewhere of a car that had lift issues making it "light" ie dangerous under certain conditions so they added a spoiler not to create down force but to "disrupt" the airflow to kill any generated lift. I thought I remembered it being an automatically extending spoiler that "opened up" at a certain speed though I could be mixing memories on that.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-04-2009, 12:43 AM   #42 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lebanon, OR
Posts: 90

Stickers - '91 Ford Tempo GL
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to Hermie Send a message via MSN to Hermie Send a message via Yahoo to Hermie
Nerys: More like 60% of spoilers are for looks, almost all being OEM spoilers. I could find at least 200 spoilers in 5 minutes that are made for real downforce.

But that's just another example of ecomodder's heads in the sand to reality... Narrow-mindedness is not a good thing.


Quote:
but I swear I read somewhere of a car that had lift issues making it "light" ie dangerous under certain conditions so they added a spoiler not to create down force but to "disrupt" the airflow to kill any generated lift.
That would be an "active" spoiler, which many cars have today, since automakers do know that lift is an issue to safety, which is a common fact that some people here seem to think is fiction...

Quite honestly, I'm laughing my rear off at the sheer ignorance of that, and that they then claim to be a "gearhead." A "Wannabe" is a more accurate description!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 01:51 AM   #43 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
JackMcCornack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 179
Thanks: 5
Thanked 39 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermie View Post
Actually, I haven't been putting too much time into looking up stuff.
Awww. I was hoping for supporting documentation. The spinning (and flying shortly after the spin) Mazda in the previous thread was an eye-grabber, but from an argument supporting standpoint, it's like arguing that water is bad for you and using the Titanic as your example.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermie View Post
I do have a life, and a college career to attend to.
That deserves an attaboy and a woohoo! I used to teach (before I got in the aero biz) and I have huge respect for anyone who chooses a career in education. To quote Farm Boy (in the Princess Bride again, but at least this time I got the character right), "This isn't as easy as it looks."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermie View Post
Besides, it's common sense that lift degrades performance. Why would people that actually work designing cars spend time and money publishing papers stating the blatantly obvious?
Hah! Now I know you're not teaching aerodynamics (and if you're teaching any of the sciences, I hope you don't use terms like "common sense" and "blatantly obvious" much in class). I would agree that lift degrades cornering force and braking force, and that at the lower end of the speed spectrum, lift degrades acceleration, but if you set up a car for less than optimum lift, it will degrade high speed acceleration and top speed.

That may not be common knowledge, because in many motorsports (e.g. dirt oval racing, and in the highest power classes, Bonneville) the course is too short or tight to achieve genuine top speed, but elsewhere there's an optimum. The NASCAR guys tune in less lift at the slow tracks than they do at the fast tracks, because at some point (determined by horsepower, speed, and the mix of tight corners to long straights), reducing lift costs more energy than it is worth. It wasn't until the mid-'60s that Formula 1 cars had enough power that top speed wasn't an issue and it was worth getting the lift down to zero (and they've gone way way past that since then, to negative lift, then to negative lift greater than the mass of the car).

Of course, having more than optimum lift costs energy too. Remember "Fastbacks"? The looked fast, they looked like they were pulling the car's wake into the dead water behind the car, but if you look at a car like a wing section with an aspect ratio of about .5, the induced drag from what the airplane folks call tip vortexes was far worse than the pressure drag. But for minimum drag, a car is going to generate lift, and if you go over or under that optimum Cl, you'll increase drag, which will cost you in top speed, in high speed acceleration, and in what matters most on this forum: fuel consumption.
__________________
Modding MAX, a Kubota-powered classic sports car
http://www.kineticvehicles.com
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JackMcCornack For This Useful Post:
Christ (12-04-2009), Nerys (12-04-2009)
Old 12-04-2009, 11:16 AM   #44 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Sorry - too much heat, not enough light

It's clear to me that the original poster isn't willing to engage in either the research (self-admitted) or level-headed discussion (my conclusion) to make this a meaningful thread.

On top of that, an insult has now been leveled generally against all forum members, which just adds to the evidence he's more interested in escalation than edification.

The moderators will usually tolerate "cranky", but only when it's typically accompanied by "useful".

I absolutely think there is merit in discussing the message (lift implications of aeromodding), but after talking with another moderator, I've decided to shoot this particular messenger. Hermie's been banned.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
Christ (12-04-2009), MadisonMPG (12-04-2009), thatguitarguy (12-04-2009)
Old 12-04-2009, 11:40 AM   #45 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Leadville, CO
Posts: 509

Maroon Ballon - '98 Chrysler Town & Country LXI
90 day: 26.42 mpg (US)

MaEsTRO - '95 Geo Metro 5spd hatch, 3 cyl
Thanks: 47
Thanked 54 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerys View Post


Frank I agree 99.99999999% of spoilers are PURELY for looks.

but I swear I read somewhere of a car that had lift issues making it "light" ie dangerous under certain conditions so they added a spoiler not to create down force but to "disrupt" the airflow to kill any generated lift.
This is what a true "spoiler" does. It "spoils" the airflow. There are some experimental aircraft that use spoilers instead of ailerons. You activate the spoiler - that wing loses lift and drops - the aircraft turns. They don't put unnecessary crap on airplanes just because it looks cool.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 12:47 PM   #46 (permalink)
Grrr :-)
 
Nerys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Levittown PA
Posts: 800

Cherokee - '88 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 19.44 mpg (US)

Ryo-Ohki - '94 Geo Metro Xfi
90 day: 50.15 mpg (US)

Vger 2 - '00 Plymouth Grand Voyager SE

Ninja - '89 Geo Tracker
90 day: 30.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
hmm what airplane is that? I never heard of using spoilers to turn. you use then to burn altitude without increasing speed but to turn? I imagine it would be a sluggish method of turning but might be neat as a "backup" similar to using proportional thrust to turn etc..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 01:25 PM   #47 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123

The Geo - '93 Geo Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermie View Post
I weigh 150, and drive solo. Try again, jackass.


Neil: Explain your fixation on drag.

Madison: An Audi TT has enough rear lift to kill someone from spinning out of control at about 120 MPH. Your exaggerations either show a lack of maturity or IQ.
*only post I want to reply to*

Once again, 120mph, something you WILL NOT see in America. Legally.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 01:53 PM   #48 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
JackMcCornack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 179
Thanks: 5
Thanked 39 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerys View Post
hmm what airplane is that? I never heard of using spoilers to turn. you use then to burn altitude without increasing speed but to turn? I imagine it would be a sluggish method of turning but might be neat as a "backup" similar to using proportional thrust to turn etc..
They're pretty common in some subfields of the av biz. The first three that pop to mind are the Mitsubishi MU-2 (twin engine corporate commuter) and of course (he said, blushing modestly) the Pterodactyl Ptiger and the Boeing PAVE Tiger. They're called spoilerons in that application and they're not sluggish at all, but they are draggier than ailerons. In fact that's their primary advantage; when banking, aelerons increase lift on the wing going up, which increases drag on that side, which makes the aircraft yaw away from the direction of the turn, but with spoilerons, drag increases on the wing going down, which yaws the aircraft into the turn. Thus they're particularly useful for low speed high dihedral recreational aircraft (Ptiger) and early UAVs that had to fly themselves (PAVE Tiger)--oh yes and for specialized aircraft flown by non-pilots (one more modest blush: the Kinetic Aerospace Switchblade in the 20th Bond film, Die Another Day). If everybody had spoilerons we wouldn't need rudder pedals any more--but we would need more Jet A because spoiler make drag. Spoilerons are not an ecomod.
__________________
Modding MAX, a Kubota-powered classic sports car
http://www.kineticvehicles.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 02:11 PM   #49 (permalink)
Grrr :-)
 
Nerys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Levittown PA
Posts: 800

Cherokee - '88 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 19.44 mpg (US)

Ryo-Ohki - '94 Geo Metro Xfi
90 day: 50.15 mpg (US)

Vger 2 - '00 Plymouth Grand Voyager SE

Ninja - '89 Geo Tracker
90 day: 30.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
very cool ! I am definitely going to have to look those up and maybe try it on a model plane. Might make for smoother maneuvers for my camera platform!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 08:22 PM   #50 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Darin, Thank you.

Without reference material, I don't have much else to add to this thread. I really need to get back all the books and such that I've lost through the years, and get back into my studies of fluid dynamics. It truly is an intriguing study.

That said, I'll help where I can with input and experience, but I don't expect to be of much assistance in this thread, beyond what I've already provided, which (admittedly) isn't much.

__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aerodynamic Heavy-Duty Truck Trailer Cuts Fuel Consumption and Emissions By Up to 15% SVOboy Aerodynamics 11 12-27-2011 07:18 AM
Sources of Aerodynamic Drag in Automobiles and Possible Solutions SVOboy Aerodynamics 12 02-17-2010 02:09 PM
Modern Rolls Royce Phantom vs Aerodynamic Coupe Unheard Aerodynamics 2 06-19-2009 10:19 PM
How to create lift using the underside of your car trikkonceptz Aerodynamics 24 03-13-2009 11:10 AM
[article] 5 Real DIY Aerodynamic Mods Detroit Can Add for MPGs in '09 SVOboy Aerodynamics 15 07-01-2008 01:57 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com