Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-05-2013, 11:52 AM   #131 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
All of these small engined cars need wider gears in the manual trans. The Stick Spark and the stick Fiesta are over 3,000 rpm by 60 mph. My auto Fit is only turning 2,000 at 60 and will stay in top gear lock up down to a light throttle 1,800 up inclines.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-05-2013, 07:09 PM   #132 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
I drove an Aveo ... the transmission got very confused very easily. And don't get me started on the asinine "hold" feature that I accidentally bumped with my elbow ... making the car start out in OD and making me worry that the rental let me down!

The same with the AW-4 trans in my Jeep. It does some odd things, probably isn't the most efficient out there, but they last forever with little to no routine maintenance.

I think the little cars are geared low for a few reasons:
1) More "sporty"
2) People would roast the clutch trying to start out on hills if they were geared higher
3) People would complain that they are too slow off the line
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2013, 03:07 AM   #133 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,882
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler View Post
The Cash for clunkers program in 2009 took thousands of used cars off the market.
I must confess I was not favorable to the Cash for Clunkers. Many of those "clunkerized" vehicles actually would be a good base for an ecomodding project. Large trucks are a good test mule for alternative fuels


Quote:
There has also been a quantum leap forward in engine technology on all fronts.
Nothing prevents the retrofit of a more modern and fuel-efficient engine and transmission setup into some older guzzler, such as the straight-5 out of a Chevy Colorado into a full-size from the 70's or 80's originally fitted with a carburettor-fed V8 or an early TBI...
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2013, 02:36 PM   #134 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
I must confess I was not favorable to the Cash for Clunkers. Many of those "clunkerized" vehicles actually would be a good base for an ecomodding project. Large trucks are a good test mule for alternative fuels




Nothing prevents the retrofit of a more modern and fuel-efficient engine and transmission setup into some older guzzler, such as the straight-5 out of a Chevy Colorado into a full-size from the 70's or 80's originally fitted with a carburettor-fed V8 or an early TBI...
In this state, the older trucks are exempt from emissions. Which means biodiesel swap!

Actually, what it means is they're rusted into oblivion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2013, 12:34 AM   #135 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 6

Car - '08 Hyundai Accent
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Currently breaking in a chevy spark, and I can say I get a reliable 37 MPG or 6.4L/100km. this is at temperatures ranging from -10 to -25C depending on the time of day up here in Winnipeg.

The sound of the rubber band trying to break inside the engine is music to my ears.

Overall a very enjoyable car to drive. If my chevette, metro, and accent are any indication, I expect a 15-20% increase in fuel economy once it warms up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2013, 11:09 AM   #136 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
Did you buy the 5-speed or automatic?
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2013, 11:06 PM   #137 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 6

Car - '08 Hyundai Accent
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I bought the standard 5-speed. at 100-105km/h the engine seems to be running at about 3000. This is about what I would expect from an engine this size though.

frankly if they made the top gear much taller it would be very difficult for your average joe to make use of it. It's short if you plan ahead. just right if you're like everyone else.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2013, 05:28 AM   #138 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Small cars are about screaming engines My Aygo (1.0 3cyl) does 22/1000 in top which seems long enough to be a cruising gear. Hills need a change down sometimes.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 03:27 PM   #139 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
Chevy is replacing the Spark's automatic transmission: dropping the 4-speed auto for a CVT this year.

They also report a taller (numerically smaller) final drive ratio, but doesn't say whether that's for the manual transmission.

Meet Your 2014 Chevrolet Car Lineup
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 09:35 PM   #140 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Chevy is replacing the Spark's automatic transmission: dropping the 4-speed auto for a CVT this year.

They also report a taller (numerically smaller) final drive ratio, but doesn't say whether that's for the manual transmission.

Meet Your 2014 Chevrolet Car Lineup
That's disappointing I bet that will lead to the ultimate demise of the Spark.

CVTs don't work. End of story. EXCELLENT idea, but no one can make them reliable. Most of these will be sold with automatic, and when the CVT comes apart at 70K miles and the owners are not going to be happy with dropping $7,000 on a transmission ...

The higher final drive ratio is probably for the CVT ... There's only so much you can do with 4 (auto) or 5 (manual) gears.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com