Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-27-2012, 02:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hamburg, New York
Posts: 104

Jenny - '02 Chevrolet Prizm Lsi
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)

Crowley - '23 Ford Maverick XLT
90 day: 27.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Bad mpg... Cleaning out carbon?

I've recently been thinking about running some seafoam through my rangers engine to clean out some carbon in the intake manifold and inside the engine. Would this improve fe or hurt it? I thought that with more carbon on the pistons, the compression ratio is higher and that's better for fe? I'm pretty much grasping at straws here I loaned the truck to my buddy for about a year, and when I got it back I fixes the egr tube (it was broken), the dpfe sensor, and put manual steering box in (pump was shot), and got an alignment. Everything that he broke is now fixed and its still not getting the mpg it did a year ago.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-27-2012, 06:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 42.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
Have you checked the spark plugs? The compression? Thermostat? Bad cam lobe? Any of these, along with other things, can cause the mileage to drop.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 10:13 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hamburg, New York
Posts: 104

Jenny - '02 Chevrolet Prizm Lsi
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)

Crowley - '23 Ford Maverick XLT
90 day: 27.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
I've checked the plugs, it has terrible compression but it always has, don't know what you mean by check the cam but I just remembered that my timing belt is loose. It has about 1 1/2 inch of play when I press on it, but the timing's steady ( I checked it with a timing light) maybe ill replace that next week and see how she runs. It's the original timing belt from 1993 182,000 miles ago so it's probably time for a new one anyways
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 10:46 PM   #4 (permalink)
Wanting more for less
 
D.O.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 313

Metric - '94 Honda Magna 250
Motorcycle
90 day: 69.83 mpg (US)

RedCelica - '94 Toyota Celica ZR
90 day: 35.97 mpg (US)

i30 - '12 Hyundai i30 Elite
90 day: 39.84 mpg (US)

i30-22 - '12 Hyundai i30 Elite
90 day: 39.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 73 Times in 45 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackroadBomber View Post
I've recently been thinking about running some seafoam through my rangers engine to clean out some carbon in the intake manifold and inside the engine. Would this improve fe or hurt it? I thought that with more carbon on the pistons, the compression ratio is higher and that's better for fe? I'm pretty much grasping at straws here I loaned the truck to my buddy for about a year, and when I got it back I fixes the egr tube (it was broken), the dpfe sensor, and put manual steering box in (pump was shot), and got an alignment. Everything that he broke is now fixed and its still not getting the mpg it did a year ago.
Cleaning carbon out of your combustion chamber is a good thing to do.
That carbon can make your piston rings stick, adversely effecting compression, increasing blow-by and decreasing available power.

I haven't used Seafoam, but ran a home made water injection system for a few weeks on a previous car to clean out the carbon.
I did see better fuel consumption after it.
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 07:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ATL (stuck in traffic)
Posts: 104

Bertha - '16 Mercedes Benz Metris
Thanks: 23
Thanked 11 Times in 6 Posts
I found good results from AutoRX.
__________________
RETIRED
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2012, 01:46 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackroadBomber View Post
I've checked the plugs, it has terrible compression but it always has, don't know what you mean by check the cam but I just remembered that my timing belt is loose. It has about 1 1/2 inch of play when I press on it, but the timing's steady ( I checked it with a timing light) maybe ill replace that next week and see how she runs. It's the original timing belt from 1993 182,000 miles ago so it's probably time for a new one anyways

timing light will not show anything related to the timing belt. you're mixing ignition timing(light) with valve timing(belt/cam).

timing belts generally don't last to 100K miles, let alone 182K.... 60K is a good interval for most engines.

a stretched belt will essentially act like a retarded cam, lower RPM power/economy tends to suffer while higher RPM benefits.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RobertISaar For This Useful Post:
Ryland (11-03-2012)
Old 10-31-2012, 02:55 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,795

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
All the above, plus check for any vacuum leaks. You may also want to replace the 02 sensor(s) if its never been done.

Unfortunately, there are many engine factors that can affect fuel economy.

As far as removing carbon, you can use a plastic water misting bottle. Bring engine up to full operating temp. Remove intake piping from intake manifold. Set to high idle and squirt (mist) water into engine intake opening. A pint or so should do the trick.

>
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2012, 11:24 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Jakins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 252

hX-TREME!!! - '97 Honda Civic HX
90 day: 54.75 mpg (US)

450sX-TREME!!! - '95 Nissan V8 240sx

chodercycle - '06 kawasaki ninja zx6r 636
Thanks: 18
Thanked 43 Times in 23 Posts
I seafoam'd my civics couple weaks ago. Felt a little more throttle response. The smoke how is funny as hell!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2012, 04:11 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Scottsboro, AL
Posts: 19

Twuck - '06 Ford F-150
90 day: 17.82 mpg (US)

Rudolph - '95 BMW R1100 GS
90 day: 35.37 mpg (US)

Terrifying - '02 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe
90 day: 28.4 mpg (US)

Big Red - '13 Ford F-150 XLT
90 day: 18.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck View Post
As far as removing carbon, you can use a plastic water misting bottle. Bring engine up to full operating temp. Remove intake piping from intake manifold. Set to high idle and squirt (mist) water into engine intake opening. A pint or so should do the trick.
>
I tried this last weekend with my F-150, with poor results. If I removed the pipe from the throttle body, the engine died, presumably because the intake air sensor was no longer seeing the airflow. (?) If I disconnected the intake from the filter box, the engine died when I sprayed the water in, presumably because it was getting on the airflow sensor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2012, 04:20 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
with MAF vehicles, it's a bit more tricky, but i've always been able to pull the vacuum line for the brake booster and "pour" in that way....

notice: "pour", do NOT feed any liquid into an engine at a high rate, you can cause a hydrolock condition and engine replacements are not cheap.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com