08-06-2016, 05:58 PM
|
#151 (permalink)
|
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 506
Thanked 868 Times in 654 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikeprof
As for me..., I'd like to see these two options:
1. Hybrid
2. Turbo Diesel hybrid
Then "we're" talking...!
|
Pacifica was rereleased to house a plug in hybrid, wonder when that will finally be sold
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
01-19-2017, 12:52 PM
|
#152 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6
Maxwell 2.0 - '17 Ford C-Max Energi Titanium 90 day: 95 mpg (US) Camry - '21 Toyota Camry LE 90 day: 42.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack-Lee
@kyledamron : big wheels and a "fat ass" destroys everythink  |
Have to agree there! The parachuting ass that the Focus has always had is terrible for fuel economy! I just really don't want to be crawling around under my car to get some boards under there to cover it up!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-18-2017, 01:06 PM
|
#153 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
Sure was a lot of that description that made no sense.   "shudders" LOL
Like, "aero-shaped mirrors were designed with the extra load of the closed shutters in mind"- What?
I liked that first pic- the front view. Looks low enough to be a.... STATION WAGON. But the rest, aft of the "A"-pillar... yeeecchhh. Oh well, as long as it works. |
I hadn't looked back here in awhile. I believe what they are saying is with the grill closed they found more air rolling off the front and down the side right into the mirrors. Air that normally would go unto the engine compartment and under the van. So they designed the mirrors (probably with placement more than anything else) to minimize that.
I still want that plug in hybrid version. We probably would only have to buy gas maybe twice a year on a couple of our longer trips. |
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hersbird For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-20-2018, 12:08 PM
|
#154 (permalink)
|
|
Making Ecomods a G thing
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655
Thanks: 35
Thanked 75 Times in 58 Posts
|
Old thread, not sure if the wiki page is still getting updated, but here it is anyway.
2008 Infiniti G35, G35S, G35 Journey: 0.29 Cd, 23.03 sq. ft. frontal area, 6.6787 CdA
2008 Infiniti G35x, G35xS: 0.29 Cd, 23.25 sq. ft. frontal area, 6.7425 CdA
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Joenavy85 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-10-2019, 01:04 PM
|
#155 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Land of Five Rivers.
Posts: 2
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
2015-present Suzuki baleno hatchback Cd: 0.299 frontal area: 21.47 sq. ft. CdA: 6.41953
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ChairmanSaab For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-16-2019, 04:11 PM
|
#156 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
|
Geely/VOLVO/Polestar 2
The 2019 Polestar 2 is credited with Cd 0.2375.
Perhaps the Chinese can teach the US automakers about aerodynamics and battery range.
They didn't listen to Tesla.
I had no idea there was so much Zika virus in the USA.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
03-16-2019, 04:18 PM
|
#157 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
|
TESLA Model Y
Just watched the Thursday unveiling of the 2020 Tesla Y.
Elon Musk credited the new car with Cd 0.23,as with the Model 3.And I understand that the 2019 Model S is now Cd 0.23 as well.
Model X remains Cd 0.24.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
05-16-2019, 11:12 AM
|
#158 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SUNNY Sequim, Wa
Posts: 239
Thanks: 79
Thanked 40 Times in 34 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox
|
thanks for the list,
but it doesnt have my car's Cd/CdA
Make Model Year Cd Height (In) Width (In) Frontal Area (ft^2) CdA
Geo Metro 2dr hatch 1989 - 1994 52.4 62.0 19.0 0.00
__________________
2005 GTO 6.0 V8 (600hp)
1991 Geo Metro 1.0 3/5 base
2010 Prius II (replaced 2001 Tahoe 5.3 V8 April 2014)
1994 F-350 7.3 TurboDiesel (Rollin' Coal)
|
|
|
|
|
05-16-2019, 12:03 PM
|
#159 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SUNNY Sequim, Wa
Posts: 239
Thanks: 79
Thanked 40 Times in 34 Posts
|
I found this
https://www.automobile-catalog.com/auta_details1.php
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by automobile-catalog
Drag coefficient Cd claimed:
0.33
Frontal area A estimated by a-c:
1.77 m2
Drag area CdA estimated by a-c:
0.585 m2
|
__________________
2005 GTO 6.0 V8 (600hp)
1991 Geo Metro 1.0 3/5 base
2010 Prius II (replaced 2001 Tahoe 5.3 V8 April 2014)
1994 F-350 7.3 TurboDiesel (Rollin' Coal)
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to KrautBurner For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-16-2019, 12:08 PM
|
#160 (permalink)
|
|
Redneck Ecomodder
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 437
Thanks: 11
Thanked 91 Times in 71 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrautBurner
|
I have a 92 4-door hatch, any idea if the numbers are the same? They must at least be close, maybe a slightly higher CD due to more length.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
