Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Off-Topic Tech
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Closed Thread  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-14-2011, 09:34 AM   #181 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Prishtina, Kosovo, Europe
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick View Post
I guess you missed this part (emphasis added):

In our Maximum Endurance Test an engine is run at full speed and left to run indefinitely until the oil is compromised and the engine fails using 13,650 litres of fuel, 4 sets of tyres, but only 1 oil**.

And the part where the engine failed after only 148 hours of run time.

The reason it used so much fuel is because they were running at very high power levels, so you can't extrapolate that to how far you could drive your engine.
Read the text again and analyze it carefully. You think 148 hours is something ONLY, at top speed men, this is extreme.

I mean this test is done by the oil company for promotion but think about the things they wont tell you. Read between the lines. Anything else apart from oil could have gone wrong to destroy the engine. There are hidden things that you have to think about.

 
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-14-2011, 09:46 AM   #182 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Florida, USA
Posts: 510

Hot Tamale - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 27
Thanked 96 Times in 70 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artan View Post
Anything else apart from oil could have gone wrong to destroy the engine. There are hidden things that you have to think about.
Then don't use this "oil test" to defend your refusal to change your oil.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Artan View Post
I mean this test is done by the oil company for promotion but think about the things they wont tell you.
Yeah, like maybe they ran the test 4 or 5 times before and the engine blew up at 50 hours, but then they got lucky and got one to run for 148 hours, so that's the one they tell you about.
 
The Following User Says Thank You to Patrick For This Useful Post:
TXwaterdog (11-15-2011)
Old 11-14-2011, 10:08 AM   #183 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: WI
Posts: 473
Thanks: 157
Thanked 77 Times in 55 Posts
That's more of an engine test than an oil test IMO.

If the coolant, oil, and combustion chamber temps are safe and stable, and engine should be able to run at WOT for a long, long, time - no matter what oil is in it. Excess heat build-up is a big problem, that's an engine design issue, but most engines aren't designed with extended WOT running in-mind. That engine was started cold once, and ran directly up to (maybe beyond) operating temp and sat there.

"Extreme Conditions" to me means having a car sitting outside in winter temps, running to the store or work 2mi away, turning it off, starting it up, and driving back. That's what contaminates oil and shortens your change interval.

Most of the time our engines operate closer to that scenario than the "Maximum Endurance Test" one.
 
Old 11-14-2011, 11:04 AM   #184 (permalink)
CFECO
 
CFECO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vail, AZ.
Posts: 552

X-Car - '11 Homemade 2+2

Velbly1 - '17 Toyota Camery XSE
90 day: 29 mpg (US)

Velbly2 - '13 Toyota Tundra
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 60 Times in 56 Posts
Where did they run the Beemer at full throttle without lifting for a week? Some BMW's come with soft compound tires which last less than 15k miles under normal driving conditions.
 
Old 11-14-2011, 01:17 PM   #185 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CFECO View Post
Where did they run the Beemer at full throttle without lifting for a week?
Test tracks like Continental's Contidrome with banked corners allow you to keep running at speed until you run out of fuel, refuel quickly, swap drivers, and get back on track.
Essentially the same way endurance records are done.

Ford has a test track like that merely 50 miles from here.
Lommel - Google Maps
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

 
Old 11-14-2011, 05:43 PM   #186 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...at one time, GM had a banked circular test track at Mesa, AZ, but they sold it (land was too valuable) and now share test facilities with USArmy at the Yuma Proving Ground at Yuma, AZ.
 
Old 11-15-2011, 02:45 AM   #187 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Prishtina, Kosovo, Europe
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Well, personally I dont need more facts to convince me that I should change the oil. If I change the oil filter every 30 or 50 thousand km that would be enough. If they have done the test spending 13500 liters of fuel at top speed think about normal driving conditions where we normally dont cause stress. Driving at top speed is destructive for your car. I think 148 hours driving non stop (except refueling and changing tyres) is very long time. If i compare my way of driving to this test i can safely drive with the same oil for at least a decade.

Driving at top speed is like a human running at top speed. It wont last much.
 
Old 11-15-2011, 08:23 AM   #188 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Prishtina, Kosovo, Europe
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkv357 View Post
That's more of an engine test than an oil test IMO.
If the coolant, oil, and combustion chamber temps are safe and stable, and engine should be able to run at WOT for a long, long, time - no matter what oil is in it. Excess heat build-up is a big problem, that's an engine design issue, but most engines aren't designed with extended WOT running in-mind. That engine was started cold once, and ran directly up to (maybe beyond) operating temp and sat there.

Most of the time our engines operate closer to that scenario than the "Maximum Endurance Test" one.

If they tested the engine why do they say; "until the oil is compromised". (perhaps they changed 3 or 4 engines before the oil was compromised in the test at 148 hours (completely 148 hours with 3 or 4 engines with same oil!)) who knows!?-thats why you have to test it yourself.


"Extreme Conditions" to me means having a car sitting outside in winter temps, running to the store or work 2mi away, turning it off, starting it up, and driving back. That's what contaminates oil and shortens your change interval.

This theory i dont really believe it. They say so but as soon as you turn the car on the oil will be heated up, small amount of water perticles will be removed (evaporate). Although water does not mix with oil but even if it stays in the oil that is a very small amount of it. That is almost zero. If huge amount of water or coolant will mix with oil then you have a serious problems and need to replace teh oil with new one. Oil does not allow metal to condense water. The walls of engine are sealed by oil so even if water particles mix with oil that will not present a danger for the oil.

Last edited by Artan; 11-15-2011 at 08:43 AM..
 
Old 11-15-2011, 09:42 AM   #189 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: WI
Posts: 473
Thanks: 157
Thanked 77 Times in 55 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artan View Post
(SNIP)This theory i dont really believe it. They say so but as soon as you turn the car on the oil will be heated up, small amount of water perticles will be removed (evaporate). Although water does not mix with oil but even if it stays in the oil that is a very small amount of it. That is almost zero. If huge amount of water or coolant will mix with oil then you have a serious problems and need to replace teh oil with new one. Oil does not allow metal to condense water. The walls of engine are sealed by oil so even if water particles mix with oil that will not present a danger for the oil.
That's another oversimplification and not true.

You will get condensation on the internal parts of the engine that will get mixed into the oil (ever seen milky tan-colored oil?). That moister will sit there until the oil (not the coolant) reaches a temp high enough to evaporate it - it takes a while. Just because the car's (water) temp gauge shows operating temp doesn't mean the oil is up to that temp. Reaching an oil temp high enough to evaporate the moisture takes much longer than bringing the water up to the same temp.

On cold start-up you will also have a rich mixture that can't burn completely. Unburned fuel and acids from incomplete combustion find their way into the oil.


Jay
 
Old 11-15-2011, 11:22 AM   #190 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artan View Post
Well, personally I dont need more facts to convince me that I should change the oil.
Pesky little things.

__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
 
Closed Thread  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Effect of gear oil viscosity on transmission efficiency (Metro owners take note) MetroMPG EcoModding Central 44 12-08-2014 11:22 PM
Pick Your Poison - Whose gas to buy? SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 84 11-22-2010 10:19 PM
Oil change recommendations? rjacob EcoModding Central 48 08-02-2010 05:04 PM
Alberta Oil Sands Gone4 The Lounge 8 02-19-2008 07:58 PM
Book report: The Last Oil Shock by David Strahan AndrewJ The Lounge 0 01-16-2008 11:55 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com