Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2012, 09:33 PM   #41 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lessendz View Post
t
unfortunately that same Larger % of ethanol will attack the fuel storage/delivery system even quicker than E10 does..

e)

fuel line made in the last 20 years is pretty much impervious to ethanol.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-11-2012, 10:21 PM   #42 (permalink)
Have, Give, Receive
 
Lessendz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 9
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
nope sorry bOss
Costs too much to do that across the board
they've made it better, Yes
impervious, No

SAE rates by low permeation THRU the material
most of todays SAE high pressure(fuel injection) line only has a THIN inner liner of fluorinated rubber..
Subersible high pressure fuel line (for inside your fuelcell/gastank)
is fully Florinated & Aramid fiber reinforced and generally costs 4x as much

do u really want to chance increased Ethanol% to breakdown & carry sludge into your fuel filter & clog it?
Turbo Evo's guys who have switched to E85 have complain about black sludge in the fuel filter.. wanna take a guess what that is??

cause That is the exact problem Boat owners & Dirtbike riders had here..
extended periods of E10 just sitting in the line,
as well as E10's terrible storage/evaporative/phase separation qualities led to..

a Huge lawsuit by Boat owners (LOTS fishermen here)
saying E10 was a problem for them..
we now have pumps which serve [89]octane (Neat gasoline) by boat harbors around the island of Oahu..
prices range from Same as [92] E10 to 10cents higher than [92] E10

btw: i pretty much Only run [89]octane NeatGasoline in my V8 tundra & Mom's Scion xA
Both make more power @ low RPM than on [92] E10
with slightly better part-throttle power production at Low RPM as well..
(Low RPM ~ as in under 3k)
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 12:22 AM   #43 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: na
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 277
Thanked 218 Times in 185 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allch Chcar View Post
What do you recalibrate?
The SGII, any time I change fuel blends, I have to run a tank or 3 to get the calibate it to how much fuel is used. The indicated MPG is useful but not accurate. I think SGII actually measures air flow and uses that to calculate how much fuel is used.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 05:01 PM   #44 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
The black sludge is normal after switching from Gasoline to E85. It goes away after a couple hundred miles and requires a fuel filter change.
__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 05:45 PM   #45 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I've never changed a filter after switching to E85 and it's been many years and several vehicles.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
shovel (07-11-2012)
Old 06-12-2012, 06:33 PM   #46 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
It's only for the first time a vehicle is run on Ethanol, the fuel filter can clog from the decade or more of Gasoline residue left in the system being suddenly flushed out. The same thing happens for biodiesel. I actually saw it happen on a tv show about alt fuels. A woman had a S-10 with a turbine engine from an old helicopter in it, so it ran on diesel. They put biodiesel in it and it died on the highway during a road trip. They changed the fuel filter, even said they expected this to happen within the first few hundred miles. Ran fine after that.
__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 07:01 PM   #47 (permalink)
Have, Give, Receive
 
Lessendz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 9
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
happened to brand New Dirtbikes and Boats which have Never seen E0 and ONLY E10
gasoline residue is black?
i don't see anything "black" in gasoline..
Neat gasoline has MANY excellent solvents in it..
E10 has an even higher % of solvents..

LMK when Consistent cycle by cycle combustion pressure from High flame speeds regardless of EGR or dilute/weak mixture strength is worth anything to ya

tell u right now quite a bit of gasoline based fuel Does burn.. but is Wasted..
because it doesn't combust Quickly enough for the Engine to capture/leverage it...

for combustion efficiency u burn small% Meth
not High% moonshine
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 07:22 PM   #48 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Carbon deposits are black. And you're right Ethanol has more solvent than 'Pure' Gasoline. E85 more so. I can't understand the rest of what you said, except to contradict you since Ethanol is almost identical to Methanol. Methanol has a slower burn speed and more oxygen so it has lower energy density than even Ethanol. But put into an engine and the difference is minor compared to the difference between Gasoline and Ethanol. They're both alcohols and even their octane is very similar.

I have a suspicion that it might be low grade gasoline that is the culprit for the deposits because I checked my fuel filter after E10 became more common and I didn't have any sludge in my fuel filter vs my Dad's buick which had a little bit of black sludge in the fuel filter.
__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 07:51 PM   #49 (permalink)
Have, Give, Receive
 
Lessendz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 9
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allch Chcar View Post
Carbon deposits are black. And you're right Ethanol has more solvent than 'Pure' Gasoline. E85 more so. I can't understand the rest ofwhat you said, except to contradict you since Ethanol is almost identical to Methanol. Methanol has a slower burn speed and more oxygen so it has lower energy density than even Ethanol. But put into an engine and the difference is minor compared to the difference between Gasoline and Ethanol. They're both alcohols and even their octane is very similar.
read more "Books" and google less internet..
to actually Learn how internal combustion engines operate.
and how various types of fuels/blends affect the equation/tune.
Especially before ya spread any more "misinformation"

yes..
ethanol & methanol are both Alcohols
unfortunately Meth is chemically MUCH more active
meth burns Clean (almost invisible flame)
ethanol will create soot (yellow flame)

Ethanol's latent heat of vaporization gives you *Double* the temp drop of most standard gasoline blends..
Methanol's latent heat of vaporization gives you *Triple* the temp drop of most standard gasoline blends..

Methanol has fast Laminar Burn Velocity
(i got a nice chart sitting right in front of me showing various equivalence ratio's, Do you?)

and the BIG key for internal combustion engines..
Methanol has the ability to Retain Quick flameSpeeds/combustionRate thru Less than ideal conditions
(I.E. weak/dilute mixture strengths and/or EGR)
Ethanol does NOT have this level of ability..
FYI: quick flame speeds = more complete Combustion
which generates combustion chamber pressure in the window of time your engine can ACTUALLY capture it Best!!
BTW: gasoline's "octane ratings" don't really apply once alcohol is added into the fuel/equation.. the problem lies in the parameters of the RON/MON tests


for light blends of Meth gasohol..
the Meth is used as a combustion accelerant to light off the SLOW burning gasoline components.. (even @ very low throttle / weak mixtures)
quick flame speeds are now a "Chemical characteristic"
opposed to fiddling with the ignition timing to adjust when/where a slow burning fuel is best utilized by your engine (what ECU tuning is about)

for Light/moderate blends of Ethanol gasohol..
you get lower BTU's combined with standard flame speeds..
(not a good combination for efficiency or MPG)

*Bonus info*
first 200seconds of Cold Engine startup/warmup
Methanolized gasoline emits LESS regulated emissions than neatGasoline or E10

your choice eco modders..
making power and getting MPG's do NOT necessarily have to be on opposing ends of the spectrum..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 10:50 PM   #50 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
We need a separate thread for this.

__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com