Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-31-2017, 12:36 AM   #21 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,625 Times in 1,450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titanium View Post
I have a Class A CDL and I drive the big rigs 5 to 6 days a week. I have been doing it over ten years. I had a line driver I work with tell me a scary story. He said he seen a car follow a truck for thirty miles on a hot day and one of the rear tires blew on the rear of the trailer the semi was pulling. The tire decapitated the driver of the car following the truck. This story shocked me because I am a driver and it is a true story from someone I personally know who has been driving over 25 years.
I never heard of something that extreme, but I wouldn't be willing to try it...


Quote:
Not all Class A CDL driver are good drivers. Some of these drivers weave out of their lane, tailgate cars like nobody business while hauling 80,000 LBS and pull triple trailers with the heaviest trailer on the rear of a set which causes it to weave like a snake while going down the road.
I'm well aware that some commercial drivers are not any good. Search for "quebra de asa" on YouTube and you'll see what some irresponsible truck drivers do in my country.


Quote:
Many trucking companies do not maintain their trucks very well and they are running OLD equipment with BAD TIRES on the truck or trailer. Everyone has seen truck tires that blew all over the roadway. It happens. My neighbor was passing a truck two summers ago while a truck tire blew and it dented their car. They got lucky that's all that happened.
I have already seen many pieces of tread that detached from tyres. Even when they're laying on the road for a while, it may still be dangerous.


Quote:
Following a big bus would be even safer because of the way the rear tires are mounted on the bus.
The fenders are also usually bigger on buses, so it may retain the tread of a damaged tyre more effectively.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-31-2017, 09:45 AM   #22 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
I'd imagine the likelihood of a bus shedding a tread is much lower as if that happens with passengers on board it wouldn't be good for the reputation of the bus company.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2017, 01:51 PM   #23 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
If you're NOT ending up with the trailer as a hood ornament at each stop sign, you're doing something right.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2017, 10:19 PM   #24 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 29.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
I once had one of the duellies blow on my bus. I did not have passengers and it was anticlimactic. I once clipped a curb in a parking lot with passengers and they demanded to know if I was trying to kill them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2018, 01:40 AM   #25 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 47
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
I'd imagine the likelihood of a bus shedding a tread is much lower as if that happens with passengers on board it wouldn't be good for the reputation of the bus company.

I have driven passenger busses also. The bus company I worked for ran older buses, but the tires on the busses had very nice tires in great condition on all of the busses. My experience is bus companies transporting people are far more concerned with tire quality that your typical business running semi trucks are.

Yes I would say the percentages of busses having tires completely blow up and rip apart are far less than the semi tucks mostly due to the busses not running worn out tires in the first place. A good percentage of tires on semi trucks are not in the condition I would want to be driving on.

I delivered a load of new tires this summer to a gas station that also services trucks broken down on the highway. The guy who received the tires said you would be suprised how bad the tires are on some trucks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2018, 04:34 PM   #26 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,625 Times in 1,450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titanium View Post
My experience is bus companies transporting people are far more concerned with tire quality that your typical business running semi trucks are.
Of course. Setting lawsuits after an accident with passengers is far more complicated than dealing with insurance for cargo.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
Xist (01-04-2018)
Old 01-04-2018, 07:59 PM   #27 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Drafting is for the stupid. Have a look in the mirror if you draft. Thats the face of supremely stupid.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2018, 08:39 AM   #28 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,061
Thanks: 467
Thanked 1,111 Times in 980 Posts
Most states in the US have strict requirements on bus tires that freight doesn't have.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2018, 01:57 PM   #29 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gumby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Butte, Montana
Posts: 725

little jona - '91 Dodge D 250 first gen cummins LE
Team Streamliner
90 day: 23.4 mpg (US)

Little Jona airo modded - '91 Dodge RAM 3/4 TON D 250 2×4 AUTO
Pickups
Team Cummins
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

The Salted Hound Jenny. - '87 Dodge Ram 50/D-50 5sp 4X4
90 day: 20.24 mpg (US)

Jona Allison aero - '91 Dodge Ram D-250 Le
90 day: 20.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 208
Thanked 427 Times in 278 Posts
Thats when you shake the leg of a sleeping passanger wille hitting the brakes and screaming..... LOL
I have found that drafting influences start about 1300' (1/4mi) to 2/3mi behind the large rig(RV , semi, bus) edpendent on how dirty the aero is on the lead rig. I showed Aerohead some videosof trucks,cars, and pickups w/ w/o trailers , that diminstrated how far back the draft works .
With my 1/3 -1/4 mile interval I find that I get sucked into the pack, when a truck travling at a slightly faster than the leader replaces me as rear gard.
__________________
1st gen cummins 91.5 dodge d250 ,HX35W/12/6 QSV
ehxsost manafulld wrap, Aero Tonto
best tank: distance 649gps mi 24.04 mpg 27.011usg
Best mpg : 31.32mpg 100mi 3.193 USG 5/2/20


Former
'83 GMC S-15 Jimmy 2door 2wd O/D auto 3.73R&P
'79 Chevy K20 4X4 350ci 400hp msd custom th400 /np205. 7.5-new 14mpg modded befor modding was a thing
87' Hyundai Excel
83 ranger w/87 2.9 L FI2wd auto 18mpg on the floor
04 Mitsubishi Gallant 2.4L auto 26mpg
06 Subaru Forrester XT(WRX PACKAGE) MT AWD Turbocharged 18 plying dirty best of 26mpg@70mph
95Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 14-18mpg
04 Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 16-22mpg


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gumby79 For This Useful Post:
Daschicken (05-28-2019)
Old 01-16-2018, 07:19 PM   #30 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gumby79 View Post
Thats when you shake the leg of a sleeping passanger wille hitting the brakes and screaming..... LOL
I have found that drafting influences start about 1300' (1/4mi) to 2/3mi behind the large rig(RV , semi, bus) edpendent on how dirty the aero is on the lead rig. I showed Aerohead some videosof trucks,cars, and pickups w/ w/o trailers , that diminstrated how far back the draft works .
With my 1/3 -1/4 mile interval I find that I get sucked into the pack, when a truck travling at a slightly faster than the leader replaces me as rear gard.
I haven’t tested for it, but it sounds interesting.

I’ve found that NOT passing (no lane changes; thus no related accel/decel events plus steering corrections) pays best.

On a known road (all conditions; familiarity) it is choice of a cruise control set speed just far enough below truck traffic that on a 700-mile day I may not pass more than one or two other vehicles. This is at about 62-mph. In the Kenworth.

When in the Dodge, whether or not I’m pulling the 35’ travel trailer, 59-mph is best “fast” speed for economy.

58-62/mph pretty well covers FE, and staying out of traffic. About all I need to do to get a 65-mph governed truck around me is to cancel cruise once he’s in the passing lane. Drop back off to about 52. That gets him well out ahead of me in short order.

Manage the problems first by avoidance, second by shortening those remaining.

It also allows no real penalty with the assertive almost aggressive programming of my cruise control. I’m still far below the maximum weight expected for that pickup.

IOW, a set speed 2-mph slower means I don’t have to cancel cruise as I would at a higher set speed to offset that assertiveness. That extra fuel. More work for no real gain.

As before, if one isn’t using average mph as a tool for trip analysis, you haven’t understood what I just wrote.

Use it

.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com