Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-05-2022, 05:37 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
alexshock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Toyoland
Posts: 149

Auris - '16 Toyota Auris
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.22 mpg (US)

Hyundai - '20 Hyundai i30
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 64
Thanked 51 Times in 44 Posts
Tank

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan jones View Post
Also aluminum fuel tank, maybe to 4 gallon?
What is your current tank? Is it steel?

It is some kind of polymere in my Toyota. So, changing it too Alu will likely increase weight.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-06-2022, 03:05 AM   #12 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
I remember reading something about drilling brake drums for better cooling and at least in theory improved braking under certain conditions, but I'd take it with a grain of salt.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2022, 11:39 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,541
Thanks: 8,084
Thanked 8,877 Times in 7,326 Posts
Drum brakes are less effective when submerged in water. Drilling them helps with that.

My 1950 Studebaker lost it's brakes after fording some high water.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2022, 09:57 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 54.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
Best way to save weight with brakes is to get two piece rotors with aluminum hats, and to see if there are any calipers made of aluminum (if they aren't already) available for your vehicle.

Every fuel tank I've ever had has been plastic.

Wheels and especially tires are lower hanging fruit, however, since they're considerably farther away from the center of rotation.

Fuel economy gains from weight loss is virtually zero, but it does improve how the vehicle handles, accelerates, and stops.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (06-07-2022)
Old 06-07-2022, 10:40 PM   #15 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,749

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 57.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
I didn't know what a brake hat was... had to google it. Figured rotors and hats were all a single piece of metal, as I've never noticed them being separate pieces before.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2022, 10:47 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 54.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
I didn't know what a brake hat was... had to google it. Figured rotors and hats were all a single piece of metal, as I've never noticed them being separate pieces before.
Almost all OEM rotors are one piece, but you can get two piece ones. For example:

https://supermiata.com/SPM-2-piece-R...Miata-MX5.aspx

These save 3.9lbs per rotor over OEM single piece rotors (13.25lbs vs ~9.35lbs) . One advantage is that you can replace the frictional area and reuse the hat. I could see this being an advantage for something really expensive like, say, carbon ceramic.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (06-07-2022)
Old 06-07-2022, 10:52 PM   #17 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,749

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 57.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
Learned something today. Wish brakes were more interchangeable so the chance of needing the same hat on the next car was higher. Would make it a no-brainer then to purchase expensive hats that reduce weight, but last forever. I'm all about that.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Ecky (06-07-2022)
Old 06-07-2022, 11:15 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 54.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
Learned something today. Wish brakes were more interchangeable so the chance of needing the same hat on the next car was higher. Would make it a no-brainer then to purchase expensive hats that reduce weight, but last forever. I'm all about that.
Yeah unfortunately not even the hat offset and thickness are standard. And, on top of that, many of them are simply not published. You just buy for the car. We'd never know even if one IS interchangeable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2022, 11:27 PM   #19 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Drum brakes are less effective when submerged in water. Drilling them helps with that.

My 1950 Studebaker lost it's brakes after fording some high water.
Odd enough, some operators still prefer all-around drum brakes for heavy off-road operation in countries such as Brazil, no wonder some entry-level dual-purpose motorcycles retained it until around 2018, including the Yamaha XTZ 150 Crosser which replaced the XTZ 125 (this one always fitted with a front disc even in the kick-start versions), and so many heavy-duty trucks still feature it. I still remember when the all-around drum brakes of the Honda XLR 125 were praised by an experienced reporter in a review for a magazine in 2001, and it was mentioned they had such a good sealing they didn't fail even while fording some creeks...
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
freebeard (06-09-2022)
Old 06-19-2022, 03:32 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Hull
Posts: 4

Aygo Newton - '12 Toyota Aygo Fire
90 day: 62.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
I'm a bit of a sceptic when it comes to weight reductions. Maybe reducing rotating mass would have a slight difference but in my opinion weight reduction only helps if you use your brakes allot. I remember driving home with 200kgs of compost in my boot, I decided to test a hypothesis that the extra weight could be used as an inertial battery in order to coast further and the car definitely did do this.... I usually get about 75mpg on my drive home.... That day with 200kgs of extra weight I got 80mpg. Granted it could've just been coincidental but I suspect driving style has allot more to do with the fuel savings by reducing weight. Sure it will increase rolling resistance slightly but the biggest difference is the amount of inertia your car will have at any given speed.

__________________
Sorry, new users are not permitted to post links in their signatures.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mikes1992 For This Useful Post:
Ecky (06-19-2022), Gasoline Fumes (06-21-2022)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com