11-18-2024, 12:52 PM
|
#291 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,335
Thanks: 24,453
Thanked 7,394 Times in 4,789 Posts
|
' price per installed Watt '
Presently:
Solar PV = $0.80
Onshore Wind = $1.00
Small Modular(nuclear)Reactor = $16.00
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-18-2024, 01:21 PM
|
#292 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,850
Thanks: 4,334
Thanked 4,490 Times in 3,453 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
Presently:
Solar PV = $0.80
Onshore Wind = $1.00
Small Modular(nuclear)Reactor = $16.00
|
Now, let's include output factor. A nuke will output 95% of rated power over its life (which can be a hundred years).
My particular solar installation is 6.4 kW, and I achieve 12.5% of the nameplate generation capacity. Hopeful it lasts 25 years.
|
|
|
11-18-2024, 02:29 PM
|
#293 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,443
Thanks: 544
Thanked 1,210 Times in 1,067 Posts
|
Afaik, nukes can go to + 100% rated, but I don't offhand know the length of time at that output, might be generator heat dissipation limited. Do know TMI ran periodically 105 to 107 per Scientific American on their investigation. Ditto for Chernobyl. ( hmmm trend?) However every so often you need to refuel. Also know Stanford lab at Lawrence Livermore in Sacto has some that are 40+ years operation, same for the one here in reno that just got refueled.
Point is: they don't run 100 years and you DON'T do that hot.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
11-18-2024, 03:09 PM
|
#294 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,850
Thanks: 4,334
Thanked 4,490 Times in 3,453 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko
Afaik, nukes can go to + 100% rated, but I don't offhand know the length of time at that output, might be generator heat dissipation limited. Do know TMI ran periodically 105 to 107 per Scientific American on their investigation. Ditto for Chernobyl. ( hmmm trend?) However every so often you need to refuel. Also know Stanford lab at Lawrence Livermore in Sacto has some that are 40+ years operation, same for the one here in reno that just got refueled.
Point is: they don't run 100 years and you DON'T do that hot.
|
There are nukes that have been in operation for 55 years now, and it seems they usually get extended service authorization in 20 year increments whenever they reach the end of permission to operate.
The reason nukes have an actual output of 95% is due to maintenance and refueling that brings them offline briefly, whereas all solar goes offline at least half of the time, and spends 99.99% of the rest of it at varying degrees of less than maximum output capability.
|
|
|
Yesterday, 09:33 AM
|
#295 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,275
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,572 Times in 2,836 Posts
|
Hey aus how's the netzero changeover going?
JC
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
Yesterday, 09:37 AM
|
#296 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,275
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,572 Times in 2,836 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko
Afaik, nukes can go to + 100% rated, but I don't offhand know the length of time at that output, might be generator heat dissipation limited. Do know TMI ran periodically 105 to 107 per Scientific American on their investigation. Ditto for Chernobyl. ( hmmm trend?) However every so often you need to refuel. Also know Stanford lab at Lawrence Livermore in Sacto has some that are 40+ years operation, same for the one here in reno that just got refueled.
Point is: they don't run 100 years and you DON'T do that hot.
|
The tmi melt down had nothing to do with running over 100%.. it was faulty pressure relief valves and locked out emergency cooling pumps.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
Yesterday, 09:51 AM
|
#297 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,443
Thanks: 544
Thanked 1,210 Times in 1,067 Posts
|
No where did I mention running above 100% design power was responsible for those meltdowns. It wasn't. Much like saying unilaterally: exceeding redline very slightly on your gasser will cause instant spontaneous disassembly with newly created view ports.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
|