View Poll Results: What PSI are your tires at?
|
<35 PSI
|
|
0 |
0% |
35-40 PSI
|
|
22 |
32.84% |
41-45 PSI
|
|
19 |
28.36% |
46-50 PSI
|
|
11 |
16.42% |
>51 PSI
|
|
15 |
22.39% |
12-02-2019, 09:54 PM
|
#61 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: ABQ
Posts: 9
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KDulcimer
I'll be honest, I don't see any point in raising tire pressure. Any pressure above what the car manufacturer tells you, and you're simply eating up your tires. You'll save a penny on gas and spend 10 cents on tires.
Run it at stock pressure.
If you want to save a buck on gas, buy it in bulk whenever it's cheap. That has a LOT more to do with your cost per mile for gas than your tire pressure.
|
Reminds me of an episode from "it's always sunny in Philadelphia" the gang solves the gas crisis, one the more memorable shows in the series.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
12-03-2019, 12:13 AM
|
#62 (permalink)
|
eco....something or other
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
|
What's a guy doing on here telling people to run low tire pressure? Lol.
In all seriousness, anything under 35 is low/flat.
__________________
1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
|
|
|
12-03-2019, 07:49 AM
|
#63 (permalink)
|
Master EcoWalker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 4,000
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
"Do not modify your car for economy"
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RedDevil For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-03-2019, 03:05 PM
|
#64 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Cargo capacity aside, the biggest difference between passenger vehicles and big rigs is focus. Work trucks are meant to haul as much stuff as possible as cheaply and reliably as possible, while passenger vehicles are about "image" and a cushy ride.
If I had a long-haul freight truck, I wouldn't second guess the engineers on efficiency. But your average, run of the mill car is a sloppy POS designed to be cute or manly or whatever. Mod the hell out of it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-03-2019, 09:56 PM
|
#65 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 455
Thanks: 180
Thanked 101 Times in 77 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie
Cargo capacity aside, the biggest difference between passenger vehicles and big rigs is focus. Work trucks are meant to haul as much stuff as possible as cheaply and reliably as possible, while passenger vehicles are about "image" and a cushy ride.
If I had a long-haul freight truck, I wouldn't second guess the engineers on efficiency. But your average, run of the mill car is a sloppy POS designed to be cute or manly or whatever. Mod the hell out of it.
|
It is impossible to know just how much engineers sacrifice on cars to limit NVH...
It is interesting to note that out of 60 votes, nobody here inflates their tires under 35 PSI. I'll admit that I used to keep mine at 32 PSI. I have them at 38 now, and it seems better. I would like to experiment with higher pressures when I get new tires since mine are so worn down.
|
|
|
12-04-2019, 10:31 AM
|
#66 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,434
Thanks: 541
Thanked 1,208 Times in 1,065 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor95
It is impossible to know just how much engineers sacrifice on cars to limit NVH...
It is interesting to note that out of 60 votes, nobody here inflates their tires under 35 PSI. I'll admit that I used to keep mine at 32 PSI. I have them at 38 now, and it seems better. I would like to experiment with higher pressures when I get new tires since mine are so worn down.
|
That's because I don't own a jeep or pinto anymore with grossly oversize tires which both ran at 10-15 psi
I cant drive the f250 @ 32, it's flat for all intents and purposes.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
12-08-2019, 07:44 PM
|
#67 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko
70 front 55 rear unloaded in F250, 40 front 36 rear Golf, 45 all 4 in Ranger.
All based on actual 100% tread contact with road.
|
An unreliable method. The single one accurate is to pressurize to heaviest tire load per axle. See CapriRacer posts and website.
|
|
|
12-09-2019, 10:57 AM
|
#68 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,434
Thanks: 541
Thanked 1,208 Times in 1,065 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover
An unreliable method. The single one accurate is to pressurize to heaviest tire load per axle. See CapriRacer posts and website.
|
Why is it unreliable other than the limits of the thermal scan accuracy? I axle weighed the F250, this was the result unloaded. When it's loaded the pressures increase on the rear, but not much on the front, the result of weighing the axles loaded.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
12-09-2019, 11:45 PM
|
#69 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Quinte West, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
Weirdly enough.. My trucks door panel says 35 psi. But I noticed on my last ones that the outer edges on all four tires are worn.. I religiously kept them at 35, but now Im at 40 to see if it makes a difference in tire wear. Regardless of the fuel economy.
|
|
|
12-10-2019, 09:47 AM
|
#70 (permalink)
|
Tire Geek
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko
Why is it unreliable other than the limits of the thermal scan accuracy? I axle weighed the F250, this was the result unloaded. When it's loaded the pressures increase on the rear, but not much on the front, the result of weighing the axles loaded.
|
It's unreliable because it assumes that even loading/even pressure distribution/even wear is what the tire was designed to do. As a tire engineer, I've designed tires to purposely wear unevenly when loaded per the load charts in order to improve rolling resistance.
Second, it is also possible to design a tire that has good contact for a large range of loadings/inflation pressures. In that case, it would be hard to determine what the optimum inflation pressure would be. I certainly would expect a layman to be satisfied long before he actually gets the optimum value.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
|
|
|