Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hybrids
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-12-2017, 06:28 AM   #461 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,013

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,868
Thanked 2,511 Times in 1,551 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowmeat View Post
Nice!

Those are way cooler than the tiny mirrors I had on Ron Burgundy. How have you not installed them already?
Cold.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
brucepick (02-19-2017)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-12-2017, 10:03 AM   #462 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,013

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,868
Thanked 2,511 Times in 1,551 Posts




  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2017, 11:58 AM   #463 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,013

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,868
Thanked 2,511 Times in 1,551 Posts


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
Daox (02-12-2017), Natalya (02-12-2017)
Old 02-12-2017, 12:50 PM   #464 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,013

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,868
Thanked 2,511 Times in 1,551 Posts
Also, used my hitch and some chains to pull a much larger vehicle out of a ditch last night.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2017, 08:06 AM   #465 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,013

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,868
Thanked 2,511 Times in 1,551 Posts
I did a slightly early oil change interval when I switched to Green Oil, and sent it in to Blackstone to get a baseline. Here's their report on Mobile 1 0w20 after 6,000 miles, with my engine at 219,500 miles:




I'm guessing magnesium is higher than average because that's what the oil pan is made of.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2017, 08:18 AM   #466 (permalink)
Growin a stash
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 803
Thanks: 412
Thanked 304 Times in 228 Posts
That's a gorgeous car. You get amazing mpg considering it's not even garaged.

And iron is a bit higher than ideal. I suppose you're trading better mpg for a bit more wear with the thin oil. That's as far as my knowledge extends.
__________________


2024 Chevy Bolt

Previous:
2015 Nissan Leaf S, 164 mpge
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ME_Andy For This Useful Post:
Ecky (02-14-2017)
Old 02-14-2017, 12:24 PM   #467 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
cowmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,659

Princess Carriage - '20 Ford Explorer Limited

Silver - '22 Ford Maverick Hybrid XLT w/tow pkg
Maverick Hybrids
90 day: 41.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 128
Thanked 764 Times in 461 Posts
Nice set up with the side view monitors!
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 04:09 PM   #468 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,879
Thanks: 23,955
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
open question to all 1st-gen owners

At 6-weeks the low-fuel indicator began to glow.I was across the street from a station so I just pulled in to top-off the tank,for a computer vs tank mpg comparison.
With a reserve amount of fuel,the car took an indicated 11.663-gallons,for a 10.6-gallon tank.
Have any of you ever dispensed anywhere near this amount of fuel into your Insight?
I had 518-miles on the odometer for this tank and the trip computer indicated 51.2-mpg for the tank.At 11.663-gallons I'd be looking at 44-mpg.
It's hard to believe that the tank/computer deviation would be over 13%.
Thanks in advance for any comments.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 04:34 PM   #469 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,013

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,868
Thanked 2,511 Times in 1,551 Posts
My deviation is near zero. 10.09 gallons is the most I've ever put in, and that was with a reading of zero bars on the fuel gauge. I'm guessing pump error, and would be more likely to trust the FCD in this case.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-22-2017)
Old 02-19-2017, 06:15 AM   #470 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
IamIan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 692
Thanks: 371
Thanked 227 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
At 6-weeks the low-fuel indicator began to glow.I was across the street from a station so I just pulled in to top-off the tank,for a computer vs tank mpg comparison.
With a reserve amount of fuel,the car took an indicated 11.663-gallons,for a 10.6-gallon tank.
Have any of you ever dispensed anywhere near this amount of fuel into your Insight?
I had 518-miles on the odometer for this tank and the trip computer indicated 51.2-mpg for the tank.At 11.663-gallons I'd be looking at 44-mpg.
It's hard to believe that the tank/computer deviation would be over 13%.
Thanks in advance for any comments.
The Gen1 Insight sometimes allows you to overfill into the evap canister .. Wayne exploited this on his record tank run to put in 13.7 Gallons .. ie how much you put in at next fuel up , might not a good indicator of how much was used on last trip .. There could be as much as a ~4 gallon uncertainty with that method, on any one individual fill up.

Also .. Although in general most pumps are within +/-2% .. they are not nearly as accurate nor policed as many people think them to be .. Owner of the pump .. might get a warning .. or maybe a small fine .. at most the pump gets shut down until the owner proves it was re-calibrated/corrected.

The highest/worst I've heard of was May2007 the department of weights and measures in Arizona (which tests once every 3 years) found 1 station had 6 pumps that were off from between 51% to 86% .. a staggering amount of screwing the customer .. They were fined $300 per pump (maximum the state allowed at that time) and ordered to close the pumps until they were re-calibrated .. no refunds to all the customers cheated , etc .. At that time in Arizona pumps were allowed to be off by up to 2.5% and get no warning/ fine / or anything else .. And at that time a single owner was caped at a maximum fine of $50,000 .. Even if that owner had 500 pumps across the state, and every one of them was off by 50% for 3 years .. Max fine would be $50,000.

__________________
Life Long Energy Efficiency Enthusiast
2000 Honda Insight - LiFePO4 PHEV - Solar
2020 Inmotion V11 PEV ~30miles/kwh

Last edited by IamIan; 02-19-2017 at 06:21 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to IamIan For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-22-2017)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com