02-29-2016, 10:41 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: colorado
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
29.5 mpg @ 84mph
Got to do a nice road trip this weekend to whyoming wish i wouldnt have ben in a hurry hence the 84mph but pretty happy with almost hitting 30 mpg with a full highway tank.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 11:44 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
I love that about my second gen. When I'm in a blazing rush I don't get good numbers... until I look at the numbers and reflect that I got them while going really fast!
30 in a fit is ridiculous, but so is 30 when you're doing over 80.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 02:41 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
it's hard to feel guilty about speeding at 30 mpg!!!!
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 03:14 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
I know, but I'm trying to get back up into the 50s. Saying "well, I'll still get in the high 30s for the trip" is a tank killer.
When you're spending the winter struggling to get above 40, it takes a lot of discipline to not say "screw it" and get there a bit sooner at the cost of just a few mpg.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
03-15-2016, 01:17 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SUNNY Sequim, Wa
Posts: 239
Thanks: 79
Thanked 40 Times in 34 Posts
|
I've had a tank avg 32mpg in my 2010 Prius
we were running 75-80mph the whole time, very windy out
and we had a Thule cargo box on top the whole time
as well as very loaded for the road trip
__________________
2005 GTO 6.0 V8 (600hp)
1991 Geo Metro 1.0 3/5 base
2010 Prius II (replaced 2001 Tahoe 5.3 V8 April 2014)
1994 F-350 7.3 TurboDiesel (Rollin' Coal)
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 10:19 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 128
Thanks: 7
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
|
Nice! Throw on some aero mods and at that speed your MPG will go up pretty quick. I get about 33-35 highway in my B5 Passat at that speed, ~45 MPG at 55. Gotta love good aero and mods.
|
|
|
05-25-2016, 05:26 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2016
Location: NJ/PA
Posts: 7
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
Don't want to hijack the thread, but I have been really curious about this exact thing lately.
The EPA highway mileage estimates are taken at what, 55? Is that right?
And here on Ecomodder we see really high MPG figures, but typically these are accomplished at speeds lower than I see on my daily commute.
I'm wondering how I can compare these mileage numbers I see to the fact that I can currently average 30.5 mpg on my commute through mountainous terrain at an average speed of 75-76 mph to keep up with interstate traffic and not drag my commute out any longer than necessary.
If I were inclined to buy a car like a Prius or a Metro, which advertise and are capable of much higher MPG figures, is there any way of knowing how they would perform driving how I do currently?
It's hard for me to calculate the potential fuel savings if I don't know how the contemplated car would perform under those circumstances, and is therefore difficult for me to determine how much, if anything, I would end up saving over my current setup.
My car has some aero mods (grill block, extended air dam, side skirts, some underbody smoothing) and some engine mods (no AC, aggressively leaned mixture, and advanced timing, etc.) I know it has a lot of room for improvement as well, it's getting an electric water pump, deleting power steering, I need LRR tires, it has lots of weight to shed, etc. I'm hoping that if I get really aggressive with the ecomodding that it may hit 35 or more MPG on my same commute. If so, how efficient must any replacement car be in order to exceed this?
|
|
|
05-25-2016, 07:36 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077
Thanks: 2,903
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
|
The best way to find out is to ask. You're right to think that you can't compare EPA figures to your own driving style, but they're good for getting a rough relative comparison of one vehicle to another.
My Insight is rated for 70mpg highway / 61 city by the EPA. Cruising at 55 down a flat road on a warm day, I get around 100mpg. When it's 25 below zero and the roads are covered in deep snow, I might get 45-50mpg until it's warmed up, after which it's more in the range of 55-65mpg at the same speeds. At 75mph, economy is in the 60mpg range on flat roads, and probably a little lower in the mountains, but I never drive at those speeds.
|
|
|
|