04-12-2015, 05:19 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: France - Paris
Posts: 762
Thanks: 188
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
|
In my opinion it is all down to what the manufacturer meant for the bike.
Very high HP per liter engines usually waste fuel.
Recipe is simple : long duration camshaft with a lot of overlap, very short stroke for a lot of RPM, short inlet track for high RPM max power.
But the recipe for high FE is pretty much the other way around ...
Except for the general freer breathing
Then it's a matter of vehicle efficiency :
sports bike offer longer gearbox ratios and refined aero, top notch accoustic tuning of exhausts and inlets, state of the art injection and other fancy equipements.
My conclusion is, for a given capacity, less cylinders is usually better if you want to stick to sensible speeds.
__________________
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-13-2015, 12:23 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
I vote single cylinder "thumper". I wanted a Royal Enfield but there were none in my area and even going a day's drive only had $4000 examples. So my $800 CB550 Four ended up being a bargain. Put another $700 in it and could probably get over $3k for it now. If I were going to buy a new bike I would look closely at the Suzuki TU250x or the Cleveland Cycle works Misfit.
|
|
|
04-13-2015, 04:54 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,882
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
|
I'm also favorable to single-cylinder engines.
|
|
|
04-13-2015, 01:14 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: France - Paris
Posts: 762
Thanks: 188
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
|
Long stroke engines of reasonable capacity are the best candidates but there are only a few :
Kawasaki W650,
Royal Enfield Bullet 500
Buell Blast
Older beemers like a R60 ...
__________________
|
|
|
04-13-2015, 07:46 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Watsonville, CA
Posts: 67
Thanks: 62
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
Someone in here was riding a BMW 650cc bike named Teresa, he was getting impressive numbers. As far as I understand a single big cylinder is the most efficient. A automotive article from Car & Driver emphasized that 500cc cylinders, with long stroke, where becoming standard size for engines of the big car manufacturers. Weather it be a 4 cylinder or eight, 500cc per cylinder was determined to be the most efficient.
Why 0.5-Liter Cylinders Will Soon Dominate Automotive-Engine Design
gil
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gil For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-14-2015, 06:09 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,882
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
|
Another good one is the Yamaha XT 660. IIRC its engine is also used in one of the MT-series road motorcycles.
|
|
|
04-14-2015, 01:37 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
There is a real clean 82 Honda 450 twin on Craig's list here for $1400 asking. Windscreen and small saddle bags as well. That would be good.
82 Honda CM450E, great bike
|
|
|
04-14-2015, 04:53 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: France - Paris
Posts: 762
Thanks: 188
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
|
I like singles best but the issue is they usually come in trail-riding trim wich is not really aero friendly and that thumpers don't like too much being over-geared a lot.
But there we can see that sports oriented bikes with high hp per liter engines don't do too good, irrespective of the number of cylinders.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to renault_megane_dci For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-17-2015, 07:55 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
|
The more pistons, the more surface area in the combustion chamber for any given displacement, the more wasted heat. The longer the stroke/ bore ratio, the more leverage and the less wasted heat. A fuel injected single is the most efficient.
|
|
|
04-17-2015, 08:27 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoWalker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
I had a Suzuki XF 650 Freewind single and loved it.
Best tanks on that were around 65 mpg - not hypermiling at the time, just steady pace cruising through Spain on a camping trip.
Having said that, FE was bad at highway speed (because of the short gearing) and city (because it was a bucking mule below 3000 RPM, so you always had to shift down even if you did not need the power).
Twins will allow a better ride at lower RPM (than singles) and may be more economical because of it.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
Last edited by RedDevil; 04-17-2015 at 09:26 AM..
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RedDevil For This Useful Post:
|
|
|