01-03-2011, 03:34 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 45
Thanks: 25
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Yeah when I heard about $5/gal on the news I couldn't help but smile and feel somewhat vindicated. Hopefully it will give an incentive to us in the US to get our energy act together. Worried about food prices increasing? Easy: Increase rail freight and more local food. Life goes on for those who are willing to adapt.
__________________
Slowly modding my 2000 sonata to what it should be... one project at a time.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-03-2011, 03:46 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim-Bob
The problem with the CPI food index is how it is weighted. It is not a pure reflection of cost. The indexed items change to reflect what the majority of consumers are purchasing within a given category. So, for example, if more people start buying hamburger and less buying steak, it indexes the price of hamburger. The price of hamburger may well have increased substantially. However, the prior calculation would have been based on steak, not hamburger. Thus the index remains little changed whereas the actual price the consumer sees has changed substantially. I do my own grocery shopping and have seen a substantial increase in cost. Even staples like ramen noodles have gone up by around 40% in the last year and milk and dairy products have also shot up substantially.
|
I don't follow that argument at all. I have not seen the prices of the food I buy go up at all over the last 5 years. My income has not gone up by much, and we are still within budget. Eggs and milk prices have been totally stable in my area. Don't buy much ramen though, I don't consider that a staple or food.
Broadband and television though, holy smoke! I disconnected the cable.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
|
|
|
01-03-2011, 04:50 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
|
One of the bright sides about higher gas prices is that they will likely lead to decreases in speeding as well as in overall driving, which will lead to decreases in deaths on the road. It will make things safer for drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians.
__________________
|
|
|
01-03-2011, 05:51 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
pavement pounder
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
the number one problem is over population, even our bountiful earth has it's carrying capacity, and when we hit it the price of a gallon of gas won't mean anything...
|
|
|
01-03-2011, 11:20 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 744
Thanks: 81
Thanked 75 Times in 67 Posts
|
In 2000 I used aprox 3000L/yr [796 gal] of gasoline at a price of $0.50/L or $1500/yr.
In 2010 I used aprox 1400L/yr [371 gal]of gasoline at a price of $0.90/L or $1260/yr.
The amount I drive per year has not changed by more than plus /minus 5% in any given year. I would guess that inflation has been around 3%/yr over the ten years. It would appear that I pay less for the fuel to drive now than when the price of fuel was almost one half of what it is now.
In 2000 I was driving a 1988 Medallion 2.2L 4cyl that got 7L/100km, a Ford Aerostar mini van 2.3L 4cyl that got 9.5L/100km on a good day, and a 1989 Honda CBR600 that got between 4 & 5L/100km. In 2000 I used to drive 15km/hr above the posted speed limit, and did very little hypermiling.
In 2010 I drive an Aeromodded 2007 Yaris 4cyl 1.5L that gets 4.8L/100km, a 1997 Ford Aerostare AWD V6 4.0L that gets 9.5L/100km when I drive it, an Aeromodded 2007 Suzuki GS500 2cyl that gets 3.6L/100km. In 2010 I drive at 90km/hr on the highway in the car and van and 110km/hr on the motorcyle, on secondary roads I drive at 80 - 90km/hr with all vehicles. I do a moderat amount of hypermileing.
Last edited by redyaris; 01-04-2011 at 02:52 PM..
|
|
|
01-04-2011, 03:51 AM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
aggie sig -
Quote:
Originally Posted by aggie sig
the number one problem is over population, even our bountiful earth has it's carrying capacity, and when we hit it the price of a gallon of gas won't mean anything...
|
Yeah, that's what my Dad was talking about in the 1970's, aka da'bomb. I think it ranks as one of many penultimate problems, but I don't know a humane answer beyond education to generation after generation of *all* people until we get it right. By that time the decision will probably be made for us.
CarloSW2
|
|
|
01-04-2011, 05:03 AM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Education- pop bomb seems to be taboo, especially to anyone in a leadership position. If anything gummints promote the explosion via tax policy that subsidizes reproduction because of the short term desire to keep their Ponzi schemes going and possibly to keep the supply of cannon fodder up. Religious leaders promote the explosion too in the belief that their religion will win world domination if their members can outbreed the other guys. Pretty much the entire female gender supports fertilizing at least three of their eggs to satisfy their reason for existing (the third + spawn is a biological attempt to one-up the other guys) and the male gender goes along with it because society gives out virility points for it, even though any monkey can do it. Without women, political, and religious leaders on board it'll be a tough slog.
Last edited by Frank Lee; 01-04-2011 at 05:23 AM..
|
|
|
01-04-2011, 07:44 AM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
Left Lane Ecodriver
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
|
In most third world countries, the only retirement plan for the poor is to have children to support you in old age. People breed early and often, especially when you can't count on having all of your children survive to adulthood.
As a society grows wealthier and better educated, parents have fewer children, have children later in their lives, and spend far more time on the upbringing of each child. In Japan, most of Eastern Europe, and some other wealthy countries, people have too few children to sustain the current population. Either the difference is made up by immigration, or the population declines.
Aside from sub-saharan Africa and maybe parts of Asia, I'm sure there will be no population crisis, as the pace of carrying capacity improvements will exceed population growth, right up until population growth stalls.
|
|
|
01-04-2011, 07:47 AM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 659
Thanks: 20
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
cost me $7.67/gal this morning
__________________
-----------------------------------------
good things come to those who wait, sh*t turns up pretty much instantly
twitter.com/bertchalmers
|
|
|
01-04-2011, 09:13 AM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Estonia
Posts: 199
Thanks: 19
Thanked 40 Times in 28 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by robchalmers
cost me $7.67/gal this morning
|
Auch! In estonia it is not much better, we have little cheaper (cheaper is not good word here...cost little less is better) but salaries are much smaller than in UK. So actually fuel costs more here. You must have above average salary to earn enough money for full tank (50-60L) of fuel in one workday.
currently it is about 1.2 EUR/L ($6.27/gal)
Meelis
|
|
|
|