Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-24-2011, 11:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
50 most Fuel Efficient cars in Europe

...50 most economical diesel and petrol european cars:

The most fuel efficient vehicles - Spritmonitor.de

...and, here's their "search" function to look for other vehicles:

http://www.spritmonitor.de/en/search.html


Last edited by gone-ot; 12-24-2011 at 11:47 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-25-2011, 01:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 830
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
How many are available here?

The fact that they aren't is criminal.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 01:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
Coroplast Engineer
 
slowbro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: suburban Chicago
Posts: 80

AV - '04 Chevy Aveo sedan - not LS
90 day: 34.28 mpg (US)

Jolteon - '00 Honda Insight MT
Team Honda
90 day: 77.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 25 Times in 11 Posts
Thanks a lot. Now I'm sad that I can't get most of them here. I want that Toyota Auris hybrid soooo bad. It gets better fuel economy on the European test cycle than the Prius, and I think it looks way better.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tango Charlie
You know how when you buy a car, and then you start noticing how many others there are on the road? Yeah, that doesn't happen with a 1st gen Insight.


AV Build Thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 03:09 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoBus Driver
 
tinduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 54

EcoBus - '09 VW Multivan SL TDI 103 KW
90 day: 42.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Do not feel too sorry for yourselves :-) I had a real eye opener some weeks ago. Had a lesson for some statistics software we use on the job, and the guy had some car data (weight, country of manufacture, engine size, fuel consumption etc.) to fiddle around with.

To make a long story short: american cars looked gruesome concerning fuel efficiency. BUT when we started to do different correlations, you could clearly see that FE correlated best with weight; groupings could be seen due to engine size and fuel type, but that was minor compared with the weight correlation.

Europeans (and japanese) car makers were always building low-weight cars (at least compared to US street cruisers). That is the whole difference.

Nuances will be added by heavy-duty AC, sluggish 3-speed auto trannys etc., but this is all chicken feed compared to the weight which must be accelerated.

So just go and look for the lowest weight american-made car, and you will have a winner... well, at least a reasonable competetive car concerning FE.

so long,

tinduck
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 03:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
tinduck -- do you still have that data available? Would love to see those MPG vs. WT plots and correlations.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 03:38 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 830
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinduck View Post
Do not feel too sorry for yourselves :-) I had a real eye opener some weeks ago. Had a lesson for some statistics software we use on the job, and the guy had some car data (weight, country of manufacture, engine size, fuel consumption etc.) to fiddle around with.

To make a long story short: american cars looked gruesome concerning fuel efficiency. BUT when we started to do different correlations, you could clearly see that FE correlated best with weight; groupings could be seen due to engine size and fuel type, but that was minor compared with the weight correlation.

Europeans (and japanese) car makers were always building low-weight cars (at least compared to US street cruisers). That is the whole difference.

Nuances will be added by heavy-duty AC, sluggish 3-speed auto trannys etc., but this is all chicken feed compared to the weight which must be accelerated.

So just go and look for the lowest weight american-made car, and you will have a winner... well, at least a reasonable competetive car concerning FE.

so long,

tinduck
so, we should be happy that our smallest cars have power everything and AC whether we want it or not? and, of course it costs a lot more and gets 40% lower FE?

yeah, i'm thrilled to death.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 03:44 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pete c View Post
How many are available here?

The fact that they aren't is criminal.
Actually, to highlight the stupidity of the regulations, it actually would be criminal TO make many of them available here (at least the diesels).

But, to be fair, a large part of it is that the consumer demand isn't here like it is in Europe. That's probably a bigger obstacle than the regs.
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html



Last edited by Diesel_Dave; 12-25-2011 at 04:12 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2011, 12:22 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
What pisses me off is that even if you, as an individual, were to import one of these vehicles for your own personal use, you can't get it licensed. I can legally drive a VW trike or a Jeep with 12" of lift or some ridiculous donk running on 32's, but a bone stock keijidosha? No way, that's obviously out of the question.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2011, 08:21 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Spritmonitor's HP to fuel efficiency graphs show it all.
More horses use more hay.

Power vs. mileage - Spritmonitor.de

This is in Liter/100 km, so higher is worse here !
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2011, 09:07 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
Spritmonitor's HP to fuel efficiency graphs show it all.
More horses use more hay.

Power vs. mileage - Spritmonitor.de

This is in Liter/100 km, so higher is worse here !
How much of a correlation is there though? I notice that according to your graph, a vehicle with a 60 kW engine uses approximately half the fuel of a vehicle with a 300 kW engine. Presumably however, these are radically different vehicles. I would imagine that most cars with 300 kW motors are luxury cars, sports cars or trucks while most of the ones sporting 60 kW motors are economy cars. Put the same motor in the same car and I'll bet the difference would be much less significant.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to duffremle For This Useful Post:
taco (01-18-2012)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com