04-29-2013, 06:48 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Burn lean and prosper\\//
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: scranton pa
Posts: 576
Thanks: 55
Thanked 65 Times in 54 Posts
|
i grew up with v8s too but nothing wrong with a little 4 cyl beater. but if you dont drive very far and dont mind spending the money on gas then hey, go nuts. could always plan an ls swap with an overdrive auto. then you could keep the v8 and add fuel mileage (and power) conversion mounts and headers are getting more readily available and cheaper!!
if not, start tweeking!! take the carb apart, rebuild it, play with jet sizes, throw an afr gauge on it to help fine tune it. get rid of points if still equipped and put a more reliable ignition in it.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 07:46 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HellCamino71
Let's not get too hasty now. I do admit, I grew up with these cars so NOT having a V8 is something of a blasphemy. My overall goal is to get what I think is decent mileage (for a V8) and still get raw V8 power (cuz horsepower & torque is fun). Enough to haul some landscaping tools, which is the trade I'm going into. Frank, I do thank you for the insight though.
|
If you need a v8 put in a 5.7 olds diesel with a 5mt, grade 8 headbolts and a fuel water separator, not only does it sound better, it also should get 20-30mpg highway without trying and about 50%-75% better in town if in proper gears.
Cheers
Ryan
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 07:51 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
If tradition means 8 MPG with gas there at close to $4 a gallon, if not more, then you can have that tradition. Worse gas hog I ever had was a 383 Formula S Barracuda, a 67 white Coupe that got 10 MPG. I was burning 100 gallons a week, but that was before the 1973 oil embargo.
You're tossing a buck out the window for every two miles (50 cents a mile or $4/8miles). In 1968 I was tossing a penny a mile out the window (32 MPG @ 32 cents a gallon), just 2% of what your are spending today.
regards
Mech
Last edited by user removed; 04-29-2013 at 11:33 PM..
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 07:57 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
I grew up with V8s too but then I outgrew most of them.
So you're accustomed to paying through the nose for your fuel because you've never known anything else. Once you get used to buying a lot less fuel, you will wonder how and why you ever put up with heavy fuel usage for as long as you did. Just about any and everything is funner to put your money into than a gas tank. At, say, 250 miles/week @ 8 mpg that is 31 g/week x 4.3 = 133 g/mo x $4 = $532 every month vs 30 mpg equalling $143/mo.....
And unless your V8s are built up and/or have low geared axles, they really aren't all that powerful- as in thrilling- anyway.
Taking this thought one step further, a useful metric is to think of your transportation costs in cents/mile; AAA says the average sedan costs 60.8 cents/mile to operate in '13! I haven't run all the numbers recently but I'm at or under 10 cents/mile; in other words- take any particular trip for an example- for every time the average motorist makes that trip, I can do it SIX TIMES for the same money. All I can do is shake my head when people don't think twice about spending a couple bucks to go the same distance I easily walk in a short time.
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-17052.html
http://newsroom.aaa.com/tag/your-driving-costs/
Last edited by Frank Lee; 04-29-2013 at 08:50 PM..
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 09:20 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
no sweat....it's all in good fun!
remember....it's not about driving eco-boxes.....it's about driving smarter!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mcrews For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-30-2013, 02:21 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews
no sweat....it's all in good fun!
remember....it's not about driving eco-boxes.....it's about driving smarter!
|
I think in his case he needs to wrench smart first to get the thing
1. Straight
2. Drag free (brakes)
3. Tuned
4. XMSN/fluids/etc in working order.
|
|
|
05-01-2013, 12:33 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
1] Mechanical/Electrical baseline first: No assumptions that systems are good until checked thoroughly.
2] Smart Use: Combine all trips. Go to farthest point first via freeway if possible, and work back to house
3] Smart driving: The reduced number of annual miles driven better.
My rather recently retired 1971 big block Chrysler could achieve 14-16 mpg in town. Nearly 19 on the highway. And it weighed, with driver, full fuel and permanent gear aboard 4,780-lbs.
Were I you I'd start there: what's it weigh?
.
|
|
|
05-01-2013, 02:21 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover
1] Mechanical/Electrical baseline first: No assumptions that systems are good until checked thoroughly.
2] Smart Use: Combine all trips. Go to farthest point first via freeway if possible, and work back to house
3] Smart driving: The reduced number of annual miles driven better.
|
This.
Make sure it's firing on all 8 cylinders. I've seen a 7 cylinder V8 that ran perfectly smooth.
Another poster recently found that his mileage was low because the ignition timing was retarded.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 09:29 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
SCHOOL BUSSES get 8 mpg. True!
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 09:58 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
Let's be nice to him. He DID say that he wants to get better mileage. And the advice to work on the basics first is spot on.
I have wondered what I could do with a 60's car. Let's see - mileage cam, rebuild engine for minimum friction, Megasquirt, wide ratio 6 speed and rear end for about 1400 RPM at 60 MPH, kill switch, electronic ignition, LRR tires, some aero tweaks to the front end to get attached flow over the hood, wheel covers, grille block, ....
Say 30 MPG? Or at least high 20's?
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
|