Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-30-2011, 05:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,149

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 333 Times in 225 Posts
800 cc Honda Accord CVCC (disabled 2 cylinders of 1600cc engine)

I had a 1600 cc CVCC 1977 Honda Accord in 1986 and I disabled 2 cylinders so it was 800cc. The gas mileage increased from 40 to 48 mpg, but it only had half the power (30 hp). It idled at twice the speed and I had to rev it much higher.

The Honda CVCC engines had a single overhead camshaft with rocker arms. I simply turned the rockers upside down on cylinders 1 and 4, and they acted as air springs. I drove it this way for about 200 miles, 150 highway. The car could not get out of it's own way, It was a struggle to get up to 55 mph. Semi trucks could out accelerate it.

I loved this car, it was great, but rusted out. Later I bought another and put in a 1355 CC engine with 10:1 compression ratio and it was 50 lbs lighter. I changed the 5th gear from a 75 civic and put on 185/80R15 tires. I got 50 MPG most of the time. It had a 13.5 gallon tank so it got 650 miles between fill ups.



HowStuffWorks "1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981 Honda Accord"

__________________
- Tony


Last edited by arcosine; 01-30-2011 at 05:36 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to arcosine For This Useful Post:
YukonCornelius (11-12-2013)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-31-2011, 05:27 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not sure what you mean by air springs, but I wonder how much faster it would have been if you found a way to prop open the valves for those cylinders 24/7, so you're not losing power to all those unused compression strokes. I'd say shim them open, but then they might hit the pistons, depends on the motor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 08:57 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,149

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 333 Times in 225 Posts
Cant do that, think about it the piston would hit the valves and then it would be 24/365. It would be sucking in mixture or exhaust. Also think about reversibility, after the compression stroke there is an equal expansion stroke, thats an airspring. If I wanted faster, I would have used all four cylinders, which I did. Cadillac's 8-6-4 engine turned off cylinders in the same fashion.
__________________
- Tony


Last edited by arcosine; 01-31-2011 at 09:11 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 09:01 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,149

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 333 Times in 225 Posts
I also had a 1984 Accord that had 2 intake valves (beside the auxiliary valve) and one exhaust. In 1992 made this operate with only one intake valve opening and the other staying closed the result were:

Much smother idle
Significantly more heat and faster warm ups (due to increased turbulence and swirl)
increased fuel mileage, about 2 mpg.
Loss of power.

I drove it this way for several months.
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 09:55 AM   #5 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,959 Times in 3,603 Posts
Interesting experiments. It's one of those subjects that people talk about all the time, but few have attempted. Thanks for posting the details.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 10:32 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcosine View Post
I also had a 1984 Accord that had 2 intake valves (beside the auxiliary valve) and one exhaust. In 1992 made this operate with only one intake valve opening and the other staying closed the result were:

Much smother idle
Significantly more heat and faster warm ups (due to increased turbulence and swirl)
increased fuel mileage, about 2 mpg.
Loss of power.

I drove it this way for several months.
The gen7 Accord (2002-2007) K24 do that stock (the 2 intake valves only work from 2500 rpm up, at low speed only one really opens fully giving it turbulence an swirl conditions .
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 11:24 AM   #7 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I'm amazed it started! Mine wouldn't on two.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 08:39 PM   #8 (permalink)
Junkyard Engineer
 
Jim-Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 167

Super-Metro! - '92 Geo Metro Base

$250 Pizza Delivery Car - '91 Geo Metro Base
Team Metro
90 day: 43.75 mpg (US)

Fronty the wonder truck - '98 Nissan Frontier XE
Thanks: 7
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
The Honda CVCC was what is known as a stratified charge engine. It basically had 2 intake tracts: a lean one and a rich one. The rich one fed a pre-chamber which started combustion in the larger chamber that ran a lean mixture. You probably cut off the pre-chamber valve which is why it ran a little better on gas.
__________________
No green technology will ever make a substantive environmental impact until it is economically viable for most people to use it. This must be from a reduction in net cost of the new technology, not an increase in the cost of the old technology through taxation



(Note: the car sees 100% city driving and is EPA rated at 37 mpg city)
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2011, 01:13 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,149

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 333 Times in 225 Posts
Jim- Bob you have book smarts, but you are wrong. It will not run that way.

It had the 12 valve engine non-CVCC, but carbureted.

:

__________________
- Tony


Last edited by arcosine; 02-01-2011 at 02:13 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com