Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Instrumentation
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-28-2021, 01:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
CVTCivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 71

CVTCivic - '17 Honda Civic 4D Touring Sedan
90 day: 39.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 22 Times in 15 Posts
Question Accuracy: Torque Pro Fuel Economy vs vehicle information display / odometer / trip computer

Hi guys,

is someone using the Fuel Economy plug in from Torque Pro? I had it running for a few trips and the fuel consumption (l/100km) seems realistic, but it's always a bit off to what the odometer of my car says.

Aren't both just read data from the ECU? How is there room to interprete things or give different data, if they just use ECU data?

Also the average speed is a bit off, as you can see here:




Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20210624_160730.jpg
Views:	530
Size:	54.3 KB
ID:	30941   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20210623_232548.jpg
Views:	532
Size:	50.4 KB
ID:	30942  
__________________

Last edited by CVTCivic; 06-28-2021 at 02:53 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-26-2021, 02:39 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,705

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 36.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,586
Thanked 2,288 Times in 1,417 Posts
Wow, am I late to this post!

The reason you're seeing an accuracy discrepancy is that Torque Pro's default way of calculating fuel economy assumes the engine is always running 14.7:1 AFR. Its calculation is based on, essentially, RPM x load x displacement, with an adjustable offset to account for different volumetric efficiencies.

Why this doesn't work, is that most engines vary their AFR with temperature, when at high load, and even when operating under cruising conditions - they swing back and forth between slightly rich and slightly lean because the catalyst works better this way.

There is a way to create a custom PID in Torque Pro that can calculate fuel economy via either injector pulse time, like an Mpguino does, or by adding an AFR reading from a wideband O2 sensor as part of the calculation. I recall finding this on Insight Central some years back but didn't bookmark it. I'll take a look later today to see if I can find it, and post it here.

In the mean time you can probably correct it to "close enough" by adjusting the offset value, hidden in the Torque settings menu.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
CVTCivic (03-21-2022), redpoint5 (04-17-2022)
Old 04-16-2022, 12:10 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
CVTCivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 71

CVTCivic - '17 Honda Civic 4D Touring Sedan
90 day: 39.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 22 Times in 15 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
...In the mean time you can probably correct it to "close enough" by adjusting the offset value, hidden in the Torque settings menu.
Thanks a lot for your detailed reply. I changed the fuel trim adjustment within the settings of TorquePro to 2.0.

Setting description: for people who believe their fuel mileage is off by a small amount - this allows you to adjust it. A value of 1 \=\= no adjustment, 0.9 mens lower, and 1.1 means increase.

Now it's still slightly off, but better. During my last trip, the numbers were almost identical:


(passenger took the photo):


And at the end of the trip, numbers were slightly inaccurate, but I think this is as close as it can get:

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220416_173306.jpg
Views:	257
Size:	58.8 KB
ID:	31934   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20220416_172322.jpg
Views:	255
Size:	47.3 KB
ID:	31935  
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CVTCivic For This Useful Post:
Ecky (04-16-2022)
Old 04-17-2022, 12:50 AM   #4 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,409

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 28.24 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 28.06 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,615
Thanked 3,881 Times in 2,920 Posts
Yeah, mine is way off in the truck, but I've been too lazy to adjust it yet. It's reading much more optimistic than reality, though the instantaneous seems believable.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com