10-13-2011, 10:36 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tallmadge, OH
Posts: 313
Thanks: 6
Thanked 26 Times in 21 Posts
|
Aero bicycle wheels
Bike rims have gotten deeper (and heavier) all based on the aerodynamic profile of the front of the tire into a tapering rim. I understand that can be much more aero, especially at speed.
Here's my question: After the air comes off the front of the rim, gets whipped up by the spokes, it hits the same aero profile BACKWARDS before moving to the rest of the bike. How does the backward teardrop shape fair in this moving air? ![Confused](/forum/images/smilies/confused.gif)
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-13-2011, 07:58 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Wiki Mod
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
|
put smooth covers on the rims and that will help.
__________________
|
|
|
10-14-2011, 01:21 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Florida, USA
Posts: 510
Thanks: 27
Thanked 96 Times in 70 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikin' Ed
How does the backward teardrop shape fair in this moving air? ![Confused](/forum/images/smilies/confused.gif)
|
Better than the square section of ordinary rims.
|
|
|
10-14-2011, 04:01 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Dunno about that. I'm assuming that even under 0 yaw, and ignoring the effects of the spokes and being in the wake of the leading quadrant of the rim and forks, it only needs a small radius for "attached" flow as it were (or weren't). Figure a wheel, wind coming from 3 o'clock... 1:30-4:30 o'clock is where the rim is a trailing edge, 4:30-7:30 is the bottom and hardly moving in relation to still air; 7:30-10:30 is the following quadrant where the rim would be the "leading edge", and 10:30-1:30 is where the rim is speeding along at 2x vehicle speed in relation to the air. I would think that especially on bikes, due to the low speeds, they're almost always in yaw, perhaps severe... so then would rim profile matter?
Last edited by Frank Lee; 10-14-2011 at 04:38 PM..
|
|
|
10-14-2011, 06:41 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: WI
Posts: 473
Thanks: 157
Thanked 77 Times in 55 Posts
|
I would think the profile and type of tire would have a bigger effect on aerodynamics than the rim, as it defines the shape of the leading and trailing edge.
The rim and spokes are all in dirty air anyway.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
|
|
|
10-14-2011, 09:12 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Polymorphic Modder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 307
Thanks: 188
Thanked 40 Times in 25 Posts
|
Tri bikes use carbon fiber wheels that are lighter and have less wind resistance. Here's a website that sell a few different types.
Wheels | Zipp - Speed Weaponry
I have heard stories that the full carbon disks do not do well in side winds, causing the bikes to move all over the road. Could be a safety hazard.
I use Cane Creek wheels, nice aero shape, not too extreme.
The type of wheels makes a huge difference on top speed.
I would like to see a bike made without spokes, that would just have a rim, open in the center.
That would clean up the airflow considerably.
|
|
|
10-14-2011, 09:59 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
|
|
|
10-14-2011, 10:47 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Florida, USA
Posts: 510
Thanks: 27
Thanked 96 Times in 70 Posts
|
Look at this chart from Cervelo.com and compare the square crossection at the top to the half-oval (fourth item down). 40 times the drag of a 3:1 airfoil as opposed to 6 times for the half-oval. That's a 40/6 = 6.67 times improvement.
Last edited by Patrick; 10-14-2011 at 10:55 PM..
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 12:28 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Gen II Prianista
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ballamer, Merlin
Posts: 453
Thanks: 201
Thanked 146 Times in 89 Posts
|
"Sometimes apparently simple things have an underlying complexity that is astounding.
Take a bicycle wheel for example. It's round, has a rim, a tire and some spokes and
turns in a circle. Simple, right?
"Wrong.
"The aerodynamics of a bicycle wheel are so complex that powerful CFD (computational
fluid dynamics) software running on high performance computer (HPC) systems are
required to generate the simulations needed to evaluate different design
approaches...
The aerodynamic flow around a rotating bicycle wheel, including its interaction
with the front fork and frame components, is incredibly complex. For example, in
one recent study, Godo investigated multiple wheels and fork/frame combinations
at 10 different yaw angles. About 3.6 gigabytes of data were generated during the
steady simulation; the unsteady simulation threw off nearly 1.2 terabytes of data.
The most recent work includes high resolution full bike simulations that are generating
exponential data growth."
Read more:
Designing Bicycle Wheels In the Cloud
|
|
|
10-15-2011, 06:51 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Spotter
put smooth covers on the rims and that will help.
|
It's being done on many velomobiles where it doesn't hurt wind-stability as the velomobile is already fully enclosed.
Lots of drag is generated by the many fast spinning spokes.
This has led to less spokes (down to 3 on CF wheels)
A high rim improves the length/width ratio of the rim/tube assembly, which is good.
It also reduces the length and thus the drag of the spokes, right where they are spinning the fastest / causing most drag.
A fully covered wheel is the culmination of both : the length/width ratio of the entire wheel is far better and constant, while spoke drag is gone.
The downside is wheel weight and instability in crosswind.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
|