Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-19-2012, 03:30 AM   #1 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,808

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 831
Thanked 709 Times in 457 Posts
Aerocap version 3

This is the idea I have for version 3 of my aerocap.









As far as I can determine within the limitations of Micro$oft Excel, there are no rearward flow angles that exceed 15 degrees, and most flow angles were designed to be around 12 degrees. That creasing you see in the second picture is an artifact of the 3D graph, and will not actually be a feature of the aerocap.

The idea behind this cap is to simultaneously transition the shape from the cab outline at the front of the cap to a semicircular outline at the rear, while dropping down from front to rear. Transitioning the shape appears to account for the vast majority of rearward angle changes.

I hope to see about a 13% or so improvement in FE over the baseline of no aerocap.

For comparison, here are versions 1 and 2.


Version 1 - destroyed - about 5% improvement in FE


Version 2 - currently in use - about 10% improvement in FE


Last edited by t vago; 03-19-2012 at 03:43 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to t vago For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (03-19-2012), KamperBob (03-20-2012), Saskwatchian (04-29-2012), skyking (03-22-2012), slowmover (03-21-2012), Sven7 (03-19-2012), turbothrush (03-20-2012)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-19-2012, 03:56 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Do you see any weird vortexes off the corner of the bed from the current version?

The new one looks very nice- a great compromise between aero and volume, while reducing vortexes and side wind resistance with that semicircle.

I've never thought about "modeling" in Excel. Is it difficult?
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sven7 For This Useful Post:
t vago (03-19-2012)
Old 03-19-2012, 01:16 PM   #3 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,808

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 831
Thanked 709 Times in 457 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
Do you see any weird vortexes off the corner of the bed from the current version?
With the version 2 aerocap, I've seen numerous times a nice strong vortex out my driver's side mirror in the rain and snow. Obviously, the vortex is more easily seen in snow, but the rain also makes it plainly visible. I'm not as able to examine the passenger side mirror as well as I can with the driver's side mirror, but I can see the effects of a vortex there, too.

They appear to form because the straight rearward moving air on the bed sides of the truck are interacting with the angled air being made to move at an angle because of the sides of the bedcap.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
The new one looks very nice- a great compromise between aero and volume, while reducing vortexes and side wind resistance with that semicircle.
Thanks. I'm still not sure what to think about the fact that it's quite a bit larger than any other aerocap I've seen. Might take some getting used to.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
I've never thought about "modeling" in Excel. Is it difficult?
It can be. Certainly, measuring the cab rear shape was a challenge. A lot of computation is tedious, too, which is ideal for Excel.

I modeled the rear cab shape as a series of points with lines connecting them. The shape was then processed over and over and over again using an arc transform function that I coded into Excel that was combined with a trig function, and the result was again shrunk by another trig function.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to t vago For This Useful Post:
Sven7 (03-19-2012)
Old 03-20-2012, 09:50 AM   #4 (permalink)
Recreation Engineer
 
KamperBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Somewhere USA
Posts: 525

Black Stallion - '02 Toyota Tundra 4WD xCab

Half Pint - '06 Yamaha XT225
Thanks: 333
Thanked 138 Times in 103 Posts
I like it. Version 3 eliminates almost all concavities. Very close to a concept in geometry called convex hull. Rock on!
__________________
Recreation Engineer
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KamperBob For This Useful Post:
t vago (03-21-2012)
Old 03-20-2012, 12:45 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
what is the "frontal" area at the back of the cap which is flat for versions 2 and versions 3?

I actually like version 2 better. My opinion - the minor vortexes created around the square edges are insignificant compared to the turbulence at the back of the car once the body ends.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 04:22 AM   #6 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,808

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 831
Thanked 709 Times in 457 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KamperBob View Post
I like it. Version 3 eliminates almost all concavities. Very close to a concept in geometry called convex hull. Rock on!
Heh. It seems like it'd be simple to fabricate, too. At least, compared to version 2. The ribs are going to be fun to cut out, but laying the skin ought to be a lot easier.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
what is the "frontal" area at the back of the cap which is flat for versions 2 and versions 3?
It's calculated out to be about 4.8 square feet for the version 3 model, and about 2.1 square feet for version 2.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
I actually like version 2 better. My opinion - the minor vortexes created around the square edges are insignificant compared to the turbulence at the back of the car once the body ends.
The streamlines for version 2 don't work so well. Currently, some of the air from the top is actually going over the sides of the cap, which is causing some of the vortex interference I'm seeing. The vortex effects cause my wake to be approximately twice as wide as my truck, which is not insignificant.

I've played around a bit with the design, and come up with the suggestion that it's not necessary to have the cap be a perfect arch at the rear. It can approach, say, 80% of an arch, still be round enough, still allow a maximum flow angle of no more than 15 degrees, and narrow the rear face area to around 3.5 square feet (correction from last night).

Last edited by t vago; 03-21-2012 at 02:37 PM.. Reason: corrected estimated rear face area - again! Don't drink and compute, folks.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to t vago For This Useful Post:
turbothrush (03-21-2012)
Old 03-21-2012, 11:39 AM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
I've played around a bit with the design, and come up with the suggestion that it's not necessary to have the cap be a perfect arch at the rear. It can approach, say, 80% of an arch, still be round enough, still allow a maximum flow angle of no more than 15%, and narrow the rear face area to around 2 square feet.


Thank you
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 10:07 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,951 Times in 1,845 Posts
I took a queue from your revision and made similar changes to my design that I did a while back. The rear fascia is larger than on the old one; the darker area on the back is the face from the previous design.




(click on image for link to more images)
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 03-27-2012 at 01:08 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
t vago (03-22-2012)
Old 03-22-2012, 10:16 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
skyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399

Woody - '96 Dodge Ram 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 23.82 mpg (US)

Avion and Woody - '96 Dodge/Avion Ram 2500/5th wheel combo
90 day: 15.1 mpg (US)

TD eye eye eye - '03 Volkswagen Beetle GLS
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)

Mule - '07 Dodge Ram 3500 ST
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
That looks very nice.
__________________




2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle

currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to skyking For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (03-22-2012), t vago (08-25-2014)
Old 03-22-2012, 03:27 PM   #10 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,808

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 831
Thanked 709 Times in 457 Posts


I am going to fit the aerocap to the above template tonight. The aero template is aligned to the point on the truck's roof where it's horizontal.

As you can see, the rear of the truck bed has a lot of space between it and the aero template. Both V1 and V2 fall short of the aero template.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to t vago For This Useful Post:
KamperBob (03-23-2012)
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
aerocap, aeroshell, dakota, truck

Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com