08-16-2017, 01:22 AM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,743
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky
Vermont doesn't do emissions testing, but a CEL is an automatic fail. I feel the state inspection is actually pretty useful here as it keeps cars off the road whose tie rods, brakes and other important-to-safety parts are near failing due to rust.
|
What percentage of accidents are caused by loose tie rods, worn brakes and rust? I'm sure it's responsible for some accident somewhere, but I'm lead to believe distracted and impaired driving accounts for the large majority.
Is it really worth the cost, both in time and in money, to tell people that their crappy car is crappy? It's yet another snare for poor people to stress over things they don't have money for.
Perhaps emission testing is worthwhile in certain dense and polluted cities such as Mexico City, but there is no reason for it in much of the US, especially in the rural areas.
Last edited by redpoint5; 08-17-2017 at 03:27 PM..
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-16-2017, 01:55 AM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JockoT
When it comes to running old cars most people in the UK do so because they cannot afford any more...
|
Unless it's something like a 2CV. Saw a lot of those when I used to visit my friends there. It also seems that the British are much more up-front about status things. My friend (upper management at a tech company) was happy at first that his position entitled him to a company car, as he was hoping for a nice British sports car. No, he was told that his status required him to drive a big BMW :-(
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
We don't need emissions testing here. Main air pollution here is dust and dirt.
|
But if you don't have emissions testing, you soon would need it :-)
And really, at least with the level of emissions testing done here (Nevada), failing the test almost always means that there is something seriously wrong with the car.
|
|
|
08-16-2017, 03:44 AM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
|
There are many old car, such as 2CV's, Morris Minors and even older, run by enthusiasts, but these are not used as day to day working transport. We have a government site that shows the MOT results of any vehicle. If I see an old vehicle like we've mentioned, I check its MOT history (also gives date when first registered). This includes the mileage between tests, and often you find they have only covered a couple of hundred miles in the year since its previous test.
Companies see their status measured by the company cars their management are supplied with. Therefore a BMW, Jaguar or Mercedes makes a statement. A Ford Focus would be seem as a company that does things on the cheap. Their green credentials may be measured by their sales staff driving hybrids and upper managers in Teslas. It is all about how other companies see them. This was actually brought in, firstly, by US companies. The old British establishments expected their managers to travel by train (albeit 1st Class!).
|
|
|
08-16-2017, 12:52 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
So even classic vehicles are required to pass the annual MOT?
|
|
|
08-16-2017, 01:30 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
So even classic vehicles are required to pass the annual MOT?
|
Vehicles prior to 1st January 1960 do not require an MOT or tax.
1 January 1960 to 7 January 1977 requires MOT but no tax and from 8th January 19977 require an MOT and tax.
You can get a voluntary MOT for pre-1960 vehicles (some insurers may require it) but even if not, you must still keep it in a roadworthy condition. You can be fined up to £2,500 and get 3 penalty points for using a vehicle in a dangerous condition.
Vehicles since 1960, though requiring an MOT, do not need to meet the stringent requirements of current vehicles. For instance seat belts. If a vehicle did not require seat belts when manufactured then they are not needed for an MOT, however if they are fitted, whether needed or not, they must pass the test. Emission testing is also a sliding scale. A 1990's vehicle has relaxed emission standards compared to a 2010 vehicle.
Below is the MOT information for an old car that was obviously voluntarily MOT'd on a random basis.
AUSTIN SEVEN
MOT valid until
15 September 2012
Registration
VY6392
Fuel type
Petrol
Colour
Blue
Date registered
14 March 1935
MOT history
Date tested
16 September 2011
Mileage 74,823 miles
MOT test number
3195 8995 1424
PASS
Expiry date
15 September 2012
Date tested
23 April 2010
Mileage 74,291 miles
MOT test number
1637 6341 0151
PASS
Expiry date
22 April 2011
Date tested
7 July 2005
Mileage 74,250 miles
MOT test number
5401 9898 5166
PASS
Expiry date
6 July 2006
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JockoT For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-16-2017, 01:51 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JockoT
Vehicles prior to 1st January 1960 do not require an MOT or tax.
|
Well, if I ever move to Britain, maybe I can finally get the MG T-series that I wanted as a kid. Or maybe even a Widgeon 7 :-)
|
|
|
08-16-2017, 02:22 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
|
MG TC is one of my favourites. An instructor I had drove one and we went for the odd spin in it. Loved it. British Racing Green and wire wheels. Glorious.
Found this TA for sale at the moment.
Used Cars for Sale - Auto Trader UK
|
|
|
08-16-2017, 07:16 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Why would you want to subject everyone to another layer of bureaucracy, hassle, and additional fees to accomplish almost nothing? Half the of those who technically fail the test are passed anyhow.
It's a waste of time and resources that could be better spent doing something else.
Maybe we need a department that tests the testing centers, and then another department that tests that department, and so on and so forth. I think I've just solved the employment problem; everyone can work for the government!
|
Im not suggesting a red tape nightmare, just an annual or bi annual sniff test to ensure people are not purposely modifying their vehicles to pollute more.
__________________
|
|
|
08-17-2017, 03:22 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
|
There is no way to fudge the emissions test here unless the garage has a "good" vehicle that they can use to stick the probe up. The test equipment is part of the DVSA computer system and the data goes straight to them. It is the DVSA that provides the pass certificate, not the garage.
And garages are secretly checked by DVSA testers, just like "secret shoppers".
This is the type of thing you get.
|
|
|
08-17-2017, 05:47 AM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,528
Thanks: 8,077
Thanked 8,871 Times in 7,323 Posts
|
My first car was only eleven years old, and cost $100. The car in my avatar
was put together from pieces of others.
In [current year] my Superbeetle is 46 years old and the Dasher is 39.
|
|
|
|