Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-02-2021, 10:48 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
basjoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,073

Aerocivic - '92 Honda Civic CX
Last 3: 70.54 mpg (US)

AerocivicLB - '92 Honda Civic CX
Team Honda
90 day: 55.14 mpg (US)

Camryglide - '20 Toyota Camry hybrid LE
90 day: 63.11 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 642 Times in 289 Posts
AirCar - a practical aerial sport car?

I see this has made the news. Iím sure some compromises had to be made, but if it functions reasonably well both as an aircraft and as a road vehicle, it looks promising. It has a lot of the low aerodynamic drag features incorporated that you see on high mpg cars.

https://www.motor1.com/news/517628/a...-first-flight/

__________________
aerocivic.com
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to basjoos For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-02-2021), Ecky (07-03-2021)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-02-2021, 10:53 AM   #2 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 9,126

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 28.24 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,182
Thanked 3,497 Times in 2,605 Posts
It was the topic of this thread;

https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...ity-39534.html
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2021, 11:25 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 203

Aerospyder - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Team Toyota
90 day: 39.67 mpg (US)

Simme - '83 IFA Simson Suhl S51
Motorcycle
Thanks: 21
Thanked 113 Times in 90 Posts
It would be more reasonable to start out with a plane design and adapt it to work as a car.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2021, 12:58 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 19,692
Thanks: 5,524
Thanked 6,473 Times in 5,204 Posts
It would be more logical to start with adversarial generative AI and let it find the middle ground. Favoring the airplane side of the equation obtained the Taylor Aerocar.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerocar

With that ground clearance* it would corner like an Aptera.

Best effort so far, IMHO, would be Fuller's Dymaxion. Which never flew. Personally, I'd settle for a car/boat hybrid amphibian.

*Stanced Aerocar anyone?
__________________
.
Conclussion: a realization that smacks you upside the head
_________________

"Anything is a smoke machine if you use it wrong enough" --AvE
_________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
Piotrsko (07-03-2021)
Old 07-03-2021, 09:05 AM   #5 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 2,039
Thanks: 207
Thanked 572 Times in 488 Posts
Would be interesting to do the adverse AI design because the two requirements are at opposite ends of the design spectrum.

I believe you are aware of the limitations Molt had at the time with the parts involved? Todays manufacturing materials would allow much better structure. Maybe even formed polymetal.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2021, 02:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 19,692
Thanks: 5,524
Thanked 6,473 Times in 5,204 Posts
Metal fatigue in the tail from being too close to the propeller? There was something about the bearings for the prop-shaft but I can't find a reference.

He also designed the Coot amphibian and Mini-Imp homebuilts.
__________________
.
Conclussion: a realization that smacks you upside the head
_________________

"Anything is a smoke machine if you use it wrong enough" --AvE
_________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2021, 03:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,453
Thanks: 185
Thanked 250 Times in 188 Posts
I think one thing everyone is ignoring is the human element.

Think about the sheer number of truly terrible drivers you see on the road every day. Then think of them all with an extra dimension to keep track of, and all of the energy (speed and altitude) that they will have when they collide with anything.

I just barely trust pilots who don't have instrument ratings. There's no way I would trust the majority of drivers in that situation.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2021, 05:16 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 19,692
Thanks: 5,524
Thanked 6,473 Times in 5,204 Posts
Quote:
I think one thing everyone is ignoring is the human element..... There's no way I would trust the majority of drivers in that situation.
'Flocking' software running on a distributed network of autonomous drones. It's the only way to be sure. Avoid single points of failure.

Personally, I thing a water amphibian should come before an aerial vehicle.
__________________
.
Conclussion: a realization that smacks you upside the head
_________________

"Anything is a smoke machine if you use it wrong enough" --AvE
_________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2021, 10:14 AM   #9 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 2,039
Thanks: 207
Thanked 572 Times in 488 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by some_other_dave View Post
I think one thing everyone is ignoring is the human element.

Think about the sheer number of truly terrible drivers you see on the road every day. Then think of them all with an extra dimension to keep track of, and all of the energy (speed and altitude) that they will have when they collide with anything.

I just barely trust pilots who don't have instrument ratings. There's no way I would trust the majority of drivers in that situation.

-soD
The only scary stuff should be when you are near the edges of the sky where your options become limited. I don't know how many rated pilots you fly with, but low time barely current IFR pilots are the ones that make the news for "attempting to continue flight into the ground".

There are transponders that alert you to EVERYTHING nearby from toy drones to jumbos @36000 asl above you.

I think that you will be a fairly limited operator in the sky.

__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com