03-11-2013, 08:59 PM
|
#181 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: idaho
Posts: 282
Thanks: 0
Thanked 96 Times in 74 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACEV
A lot of people forget that a little torque can be multiplied by lower gearing. Also, a tractor/trailer used for city delivery over an eight hour work day will spend over six hours only needing 100 hp and 200 hp for approximately one hour total.
|
Doesn't work for long haul trucks. They need to go at least 55 MPH, and maintain that speed even going up hills, unless they're hauling very heavy/oversize loads.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-11-2013, 09:12 PM
|
#182 (permalink)
|
Grand Imperial Poobah
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Newington, CT USA
Posts: 247
Thanks: 31
Thanked 488 Times in 144 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACEV
A lot of people forget that a little torque can be multiplied by lower gearing. Also, a tractor/trailer used for city delivery over an eight hour work day will spend over six hours only needing 100 hp and 200 hp for approximately one hour total.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galane
Doesn't work for long haul trucks. They need to go at least 55 MPH, and maintain that speed even going up hills, unless they're hauling very heavy/oversize loads.
|
What ACEV is advocating will absolutely work for long haul trucks.
I believe you are thinking about a conventionally powered rig. One with a large ICE, a transmission, and a differential, or two.
That has no relation to a series hybrid configuration in this discussion. It is an apples to oranges thing.
We are venturing way off aerodynamics in this post. I am thinking about starting a new big-rig discussion in the Hybrid Forum.
__________________
Bob Sliwa
"Like a Midget at a Urinal, I knew I was gonna have to stay on my toes......."
http://www.airflowtruck.com
Last edited by Shepherd777; 03-11-2013 at 10:08 PM..
|
|
|
03-11-2013, 11:36 PM
|
#183 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 190
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shepherd777
We are venturing way off aerodynamics in this post. I am thinking about starting a new big-rig discussion in the Hybrid Forum.
|
I'll be watching!
__________________
2016 BMW 535d
4100lb XDrive Eco-Yacht
|
|
|
03-12-2013, 04:49 PM
|
#184 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Eau Claire, WI
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
|
That's awesome! We've started getting trucks with single differentials here instead of the double differentials that have been common for the last 50 years or so (They're 6x2, most trucks are 6x4 drive). There are also collapsible trailer tails on the trailers and side skirts.
For what it's worth, the highest I ever managed to get a semi on MPG was 9.02 MPG with an empty flatbed headed from Chicago to Duluth.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to p38fln For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-12-2013, 11:18 PM
|
#185 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 190
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
|
Funny wind tunnel video, actually demonstrating airflow over a horizontal hood and vertical windshield (similar to many heavy trucks). And the human face...
Not too scientific (the camera man is actually standing upstream at the start of the video...) but funny anyway.
__________________
2016 BMW 535d
4100lb XDrive Eco-Yacht
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Blue Angel For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-13-2013, 12:32 AM
|
#186 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 190
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
|
And this video shows what is likely a key reason for the lack of truck aerodynamic study; no wind tunnels large enough for full scale tests! Here, a rig is tested in a NASA wind tunnel... I don't imagine this facility is cheap to rent:
__________________
2016 BMW 535d
4100lb XDrive Eco-Yacht
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Blue Angel For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-16-2013, 06:40 AM
|
#187 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alaska
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shepherd777
What ACEV is advocating will absolutely work for long haul trucks.
I believe you are thinking about a conventionally powered rig. One with a large ICE, a transmission, and a differential, or two.
That has no relation to a series hybrid configuration in this discussion. It is an apples to oranges thing.
We are venturing way off aerodynamics in this post. I am thinking about starting a new big-rig discussion in the Hybrid Forum.
|
Shepherd777 R u familiar or involved with epower engine systems? It seems like the design you are advocating is exactly what this company is developing. You can see their prototype unit running on youtube. Can u elaborate? If you are not part of their team you should look up to join them somehow? They might need your efficient aero designs and experience to improve their mileage.
By the way I admire your hard work and amazing designs you have created very much so far. You are a great trailblazer that sets the example for the whole industry. I wish I had the resources to underwrite your projects and 49 page business plan. May be some day when your company goes public you can tip us to buy some shares.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Efe For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-17-2013, 02:30 AM
|
#188 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shepherd777
20+ mpg, actually. Remember big rigs do like 95% highway driving. And around town, the batteries and super-capacitors will be doing the work.
|
What am I supposed to do when you can move 80,000 pounds with less fuel than I need for 3,000?
|
|
|
03-22-2013, 07:33 PM
|
#189 (permalink)
|
Permanent Lurker
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Czechoslovakia (sort of), Europe
Posts: 348
Dáčenka - '10 Dacia / Renault Logan MCV 1.5 dCi (X90 k9k) 90 day: 47.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 198 Times in 92 Posts
|
I know this should go into hybrid forum, but I cant resist. I am little sceptical about all the hybrid power extasy. From this page: EPower Engine Systems; Exploring The Limits Of Hybrid Truck Efficiency - John Petersen - Seeking Alpha it seems that the biggest advantage in hybrid over traditional power is that engine runs under constant load at ideal RPMs. Something Shepherd777 can achieve with his 13 speed manual too.
Allright, there is regenerative braking. And fuel cut off in deceleration.
So here is my question. Is hybrid really so much better over decent "traditionally" designed drivetrain and driving with brain, so it is worth the increased overall complexity, need to change whole battery pack every 5 years, need for specialized service, risk of being underpowered when in emergency and so on? I am just curious.
I assume that due nature of hybrid running in constant RPMs even a trigger happy heavy footed driver gets good mileage. How about robotised stick-shift that keeps motor in ideal RPMs but takes a load off the driver, still enabling him to choose the gear manually? (something like this: http://www.tatratrucks.com/underwood...norgren_en.pdf)
|
|
|
03-22-2013, 08:27 PM
|
#190 (permalink)
|
Always Too Busy
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 566
Thanks: 405
Thanked 190 Times in 134 Posts
|
You bring up some fantastic points (that I would also like to hear the answer to), but this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by seifrob
How about robotised stick-shift that keeps motor in ideal RPMs but takes a load off the driver [...]
|
just makes me think: "Isn't that called a CVT?"
__________________
Nissan Leaf driver? Join me in Team Leaf and feel smugly superior about our MPGe
Current Car: White Lightning
----------------------------------------------
Retired Car: Betty White
|
|
|
|