Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-24-2011, 05:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Anyone else mod other than for econmoy.

By far, the last thing on my mind when it comes to modding is how it will affect my fuel mileage. My Laser has 1050cc injectors high flow fuel pump I get lucky if my 2.0L breaks 20 mpg.

So does anyone else mod for power here?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-24-2011, 07:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,522 Times in 1,123 Posts
Eco = 1/hp
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
PaleMelanesian (04-26-2011)
Old 04-24-2011, 07:58 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Say what now?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 09:57 PM   #4 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 1,766

The Karen-Mobile - '05 Dodge Magnum SXT
Team Dodge
90 day: 26.72 mpg (US)

Fiat Dakota - '00 Dodge Dakota SLT RWD Quad Cab
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)

The Red Sled - '01 Dodge Durango SLT 4WD
90 day: 16.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 799
Thanked 682 Times in 437 Posts
I mod for both power and economy. Unlike some here, I think that properly done mods for power will also increase economy aka efficiency.
__________________
The Fiat Dakota


The Karen-mobile


The Red Sled
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 10:40 PM   #5 (permalink)
Intermediate EcoDriver
 
Mustang Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Arizona - It's a DRY cold..
Posts: 669

Trigger - '07 Ford Mustang V6 Premium Coupe
Team Mustang
Sports Cars
90 day: 33.47 mpg (US)

Big Red (retired) - '89 Ford F-250 4wd Custom
90 day: 18.13 mpg (US)

Big Red II - '13 Ford F-150 FX4
Pickups
90 day: 19.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 162
Thanked 129 Times in 102 Posts
I bought a Hypertech power programmer for my Mustang about the same time I found ecomodder.com. It made a noticeable difference in performance, but not in fuel economy. Tips from ecomodder.com made a noticeable difference in FE.
I've never been able to squeeze 20 MPG out of my 4.0L Mustang. I must not be trying hard enough....
__________________
Fuel economy is nice, but sometimes I just gotta put the spurs to my pony!



Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguitarguy View Post
Just 'cuz you can't do it, don't mean it can't be done...
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
The presence of traffic is the single most complicating factor of hypermiling. I know what I'm going to do, it's contending with whatever the hell all these other people are going to do that makes things hard.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 01:55 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 499
Thanks: 20
Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts
t vago:
Yep totally agree. The temptation is of course once having gone to the trouble to mod the ride to get the extra power is the opportunity to use it!

REV-X:
The shorthand reply from Old Tele Man says: Economy is the inverse of power.
If you chase one then the other is not usually achievable.

Here the focus is mainly about economy and power is not thought of as being as important even though there are a few who can build engines providing that is there is a need.

From a personal point I find there is as much of a challenge in going the economy route as there is in the power route.
Maybe the reason is I have been down the power build route already back in the day with carbs , distributors and all that.

There is another similar board which does have a dedicated power mods section:
GasSavers.org - Fuel Efficiency, Save Gas and Gas Mileage Forum
and some of the posters here also show up there.

Peter.

Last edited by Peter7307; 04-25-2011 at 02:25 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 02:22 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orange Country, CA
Posts: 102

Fiesta - '12 Ford Fiesta SE
90 day: 31.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
If you solely decrease the drag of the car, a few mods like adding rear wheel skirts or covering the underside of the car, I don't see how that would take away from power. Wouldn't that increase economy and power even if just a little? If the Cd is lowered than top speed is increased, right?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 02:32 AM   #8 (permalink)
X-Frenchy: very
 
groar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toulouse, France
Posts: 595

scenic - '01 renault scenic
90 day: 43.09 mpg (US)

megane - '97 renault megane classic
Diesel
90 day: 72.53 mpg (US)

dennisius - '06 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 69.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 23 Posts
I'm modding for ecology
Economy is the ice on the cake but it's welcome and this argument is the more understandable by other people.
Having a car that is reacting much faster and that is accelerating faster than some cars tuned for performance is a little pleasure that I put in the face of some young people that are laughing at my car

Among all my mods, the rear wheel skirts are those that make more feeling change at the accelerator side.

Have fun,

Denis.
__________________
Save money & CO2 at home : http://ecorenovator.org/
Created and managed by the creators of http://ecomodder.com/
---
Earth and health are priceless, so are kilotank and AT-PZEV
Best Mégane tank: 1268.9mi @ 77.847 MPG(US)
2008/06-2011/10 saving:
  • 5725.5 kg CO2 (5342.6+382.9)
  • Diesel / Money: 42.17% = 2446.25€ = 3357.26$


---
megane : thread - kill switch.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 07:54 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,020 Times in 1,303 Posts
Modding for power can improve economy, but in most cases it means getting more air and fuel through the engine for more horsepower.
Alfa Romeo got 390 horsepower out of 90 cubic inches in 1950, or close to 4.5 HP per cubic inch.
Got 2 MPG.
Why go there when they were at that point the year I was born.
Heck I wish my car had half the engine it does now.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 08:23 AM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
I wish my car had twice the engine it has now. Between Megasquirt and ripping 100lb out of the car, I try to find efficiency where ever I can be it for power or FE.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com