Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Forum News & Feedback
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-31-2008, 02:06 PM   #11 (permalink)
Mr. Blue Tape
 
azraelswrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 345

AzxA - '06 Scion xA
90 day: 42.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
It wouldn't affect the calcs but visually could give you off values if the rounding is too significant (ie hundreth vs thousandth place).

For example the Scangauge does the same thing: it said I had traveled 207 miles but based on the fuel usage and MPG value (both from SG) it was actually using the car odometer reading of 207.7 and not just 207. It was truncating the decimal values visually but was still calculating the correct MPG.

(assuming of course that the fuel usage is accurate... I won't know until my next tank refill)

__________________


My 5 pillars of fuel efficiency:
  • driving style
  • aerodynamics
  • tires
  • weight reduction
  • engine maintenance
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-31-2008, 09:55 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I think your right.



Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
Noel -



When you say 2 decimal, can you be more specific? It sounds (to me) like you are talking about the display format. If you mean the display format, I thought that rounding did not apply to the actual calculation.

CarloSW2

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com