05-18-2019, 03:10 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
eco....something or other
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
|
Balance shaft delete (better MPG observed)
I just removed the balance shafts from our 2006 rav4 2.5L and I wish I had done it sooner. The difference is amazing. More power, better response, less throttle needed, and quieter.
It used to down shift on the hills around here and the rpm's would go way up. Now it just rolls right up the hills like they're not even there. Night and day difference.
I hope we don't get a speeding ticket, because it takes barely any throttle to maintain speed. It's going to take some getting used to for sure.
The engine is much quieter now. There was some "clattering" that we attributed to engine wear, but it's gone now. It had to be the shafts making noise. We can now whisper with the engine running, both inside and outside the car. All you hear is the injectors clicking and the exhaust.
The mileage should go up some too.
__________________
1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
Last edited by MetroMPG; 06-11-2019 at 05:02 PM..
Reason: (added info to title)
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to IsaacCarlson For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-18-2019, 10:25 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,016
Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix 90 day: 26.7 mpg (US) SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S 90 day: 30.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 195
Thanked 247 Times in 190 Posts
|
Do you know the design intent of the balance shaft? Was it for idle vibration?
|
|
|
05-18-2019, 11:01 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
eco....something or other
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
|
Yes, it was just for comfort, but you'd have a hard time even knowing it was there.
__________________
1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
|
|
|
05-18-2019, 11:51 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: KY
Posts: 1,352
Thanks: 63
Thanked 366 Times in 269 Posts
|
Such is the case for a lot of modern four cylinder engines... they’re fairly smooth even with the shafts deleted...
Did you physically remove yours or were they powered by their own chain which you could cut/remove?
__________________
My current Ecotec project...
My last Ecotec project...
|
|
|
05-18-2019, 11:54 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
eco....something or other
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
|
I took them out. They were gear driven by the crank. They have plastic gears.
__________________
1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
|
|
|
05-18-2019, 12:17 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: KY
Posts: 1,352
Thanks: 63
Thanked 366 Times in 269 Posts
|
Plastic gears? WtF, Toyota?
I’ll have to buy a kit for my car, my balance shafts are ran on a chain that also runs the water pump...
__________________
My current Ecotec project...
My last Ecotec project...
|
|
|
05-18-2019, 12:19 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
eco....something or other
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
|
I know, I was shocked as well.
The engine was making clattering noise and I figured it was just showing age.
It was the shafts! It's sooo quiet now.
__________________
1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
|
|
|
05-18-2019, 01:10 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: KY
Posts: 1,352
Thanks: 63
Thanked 366 Times in 269 Posts
|
Hmm... (looks over ZZP performance catalog)
__________________
My current Ecotec project...
My last Ecotec project...
|
|
|
05-20-2019, 03:27 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,096
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,571 Times in 1,594 Posts
|
I'm almost done putting a Honda 2.4L in my Insight. One of my first mods to the engine was to delete the balance shafts. These weight around 11lbs, are part of the oil pump assembly, and spin at twice engine RPM because their purpose is to minimize second order harmonics which would be transferred through the engine mounts. They don't do anything for engine longevity and add both friction and a lot of inertia to the engine.
I'll post a video of it when I'm done, looking like Thursday.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-20-2019, 11:53 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
|
Counter argument:
https://www.jackstransmissions.com/b...balance-shafts
Since balance shafts spin at higher than crank speeds, it makes sense that they can wear out their bearings before the crank bearings, leading to noise etc. So removing worn balance shafts can 'improve' an engine.
|
|
|
|