Quote:
Originally Posted by slipknotsv
It is best CURVED LINE
|
I'm not sure that it's the best,but it would be low risk to anyone considering aft-body streamlining.
Here are a few which Rolf Buchheim and his associates tested at 1/5-scale at Volkswagen,including their plan-view,along with their coefficients of aerodynamic drag.
The 1922 Wolfgang Klemperer body
![](http://i1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/Untitled1_6.jpg)
The 1981 'Drop' body
![](http://i1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/Untitled2_6.jpg)
The 1981 'Blunt' body
![](http://i1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/Untitled3_6.jpg)
The 1981 'Flow' body (truncated tail)
![](http://i1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/Untitled4_6.jpg)
The 1981 'Flow' body (full body)
![](http://i1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/Untitled5_6.jpg)
They also tested the 1937 AVA G'o'ttengen Schl'o'r pilbug car
@ 1/5-scale it was Cd 0.15 with a smooth belly
@ 1:1 scale it was Cd 0.158 with a smooth belly
@ 1:1 scale it was Cd 0.186 with a 'standard' underbody
![](http://i1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/Untitled4-2.jpg)
I don't have its plan-view scanned yet.Sorry.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
With 'features' drag,all the models would have a little higher drag (0.008 in the case of the Pilbug car).
*Adding mirrors might add in the range of 0.015 (as with the Ford FUSION LSR car).