05-18-2017, 04:54 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 119
Thanks: 2
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
|
Actually one of the best ever designed noses, is from the 1970 Plymouth Superbird. With that nose and rear window modification Plymouth was able to drop the Belvedere/ Roadrunner that probably originally had a Cd in the mid .40's, down to a .28 Cd.
The A pillars and windshield slope were the only things keeping the Cd above .25
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ALS For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-19-2017, 03:32 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 64
Thanks: 9
Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts
|
Mr. aerohead please comment
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to slipknotsv For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-19-2017, 04:14 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 64
Thanks: 9
Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
|
|
05-19-2017, 10:16 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slipknotsv
|
Those look like Fiero wheels. It wouldn't be a stretch to build that thing on a fiero chassis. There's nothing except trunk space and the muffler past the rear wheels...there's no real need for anything past 'em.
|
|
|
05-19-2017, 10:40 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,245
Thanks: 65
Thanked 225 Times in 186 Posts
|
I have never seen that car or a photo of it from any other direction.
It looks like an X-wing frim starwars or the equivalent from the old battlestar galactica.
|
|
|
05-19-2017, 01:33 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,868
Thanks: 8,189
Thanked 8,965 Times in 7,405 Posts
|
It looks hard to get in and out of.
Quote:
The Daytona's rear wheels tended to lose their traction, until that massive spoiler was put on, because it carried a standard 440 cubic inch, 375-hp engine, and air would flow under the car and lift it.
|
The quote and the chin spoiler show it isn't quite ideal. Lowering the stagnation point seems called for. Good for it's day, though.
|
|
|
05-19-2017, 11:09 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
|
Cd 0.18
Blunt nose is lower drag. Pointy noses apply only above 250MPH.
|
|
|
05-19-2017, 11:58 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Aero Deshi
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
|
The idea behind reducing aerodynamic drag is to disturb the air as little as possible as you drive through it, the more you disturb it, the more it swirls around after you pass, the more energy it takes to keep moving. The longer sloping tail helps the air to gradually get back into the place it was before you drove through it, thus making it swirl about less, and this is what reduces drag.
A pointy nose may help a bit, but the air is going to move up, and sideways to go around your vehicle regardless of the shape in the front, it will in fact form a fairly good shape itself because the air knows you're coming several feet before you reach it.
From what I've learned here, 25-30% of aero gains can be had in the front, another 70-75% is shaping it right in the back.
|
|
|
05-20-2017, 01:50 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,868
Thanks: 8,189
Thanked 8,965 Times in 7,405 Posts
|
Leave a few % for the vehicle/ground plenum.
|
|
|
05-20-2017, 05:47 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Permanent Lurker
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Czechoslovakia (sort of), Europe
Posts: 348
Dáčenka - '10 Dacia / Renault Logan MCV 1.5 dCi (X90 k9k) 90 day: 47.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 198 Times in 92 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by teoman
I have never seen that car or a photo of it from any other direction. ....
|
Because it is ( imho ) completely PhotoShopped. Look at the shadows and perspective inside the canopy. But I might be completely wrong, of course.
|
|
|
|