Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
It's reasoning by analogy. It would work as well with Robert's Rules of Order.
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. You're absolutely wrong.
It's about ' intelligence' in the context of 'The Art of War.' It's one of the most important books ever written in the history of man, and still required reading for all officer cadets at the U.S. ARMY's West Point Academy.
It's why the USA had an O.S.S. ( now C.I.A. ), atmospheric monitoring stations, F.BI., Global Positioning Satellites, Hurricane Hunters, Institute for Advanced Research, JASON, Mitre Corporation, ocean buoys , Office of Naval Intelligence, Office of Air Force Intelligence, National Reconnaissance Office, NORAD, nuclear submarine listening posts, Pentagon, sea-floor acoustic monitoring systems, RAND Corporation, radiosondes, seismic monitoring systems, space-weather monitoring satellites, spies, spy-satellites, spy-planes, terrestrial solar observatories, tornado sirens, tsunami warning sirens, volcano monitoring laboratories, weather satellites, etc..
Data is information.
Information processing leads to knowledge.
Knowledge ( 'intel ' ) is what the 'Intelligence community' uses to keep us safe at night, and ahead of our adversaries.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This speculating causes nothing but trouble.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facts cannot be argued.
Facts about tribology cannot be argued.
Whomever has more 'intel' about tribology ultimately ends any tribological 'debate.'
Those acquainted with a good copy of 'The Art of War', tribology, automotive testing, and have followed Logic's posting over the years, probably figured out long ago that, he'd never be able to scientifically defend his hypothesis about 'boron' additives.
I'll continue to provide the prima facie evidence such that, at the 'end of the day' everyone following the 'debate', will be in a position to 'know' the 'facts.'