Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Off-Topic Tech
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-02-2024, 02:11 PM   #1 (permalink)
Y2kbug
 
y2kbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 36

1999 corolla - '99 Toyota Corolla CE
Team Toyota
90 day: 47.1 mpg (US)

03 dakota v6 2wd auto - '03 Dodge Dakota
Team Dodge
90 day: 18.69 mpg (US)

98 s10 - '99 Gmc S10
Thanks: 16
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Build 85 corolla to save gas or make fast?

Is it worth it to build my 85 rwd corolla coupe to be a gas saver? Or should i stick to my original plan of making it go fast?

I'm not interested in doing roof chops or major body modifications to this car. I do need to put a new engine and manual trans in the car. I figure nows the time to look into different engine and transmissions for this car.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-02-2024, 10:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
Too many cars
 
Gasoline Fumes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York State
Posts: 1,610

CRXFi - '88 Honda CRX XFi

Insight 256 - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights

Insight 5342 (no IMA) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 66.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,359
Thanked 810 Times in 481 Posts
Only you can really answer that question. What would you like to do with it? If you just plan to commute with it, an MPG build might make more sense. If it's just for cruising around, restore it with the proper 4A or 4AGE engine. If you're after power, swap in whatever you can fit in it. Or sell it if you're undecided. It's probably worth some money if it's in good condition.
__________________
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2006 Honda Insight (parts car)
1988 Honda CRXFi
1994 Geo Metro

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2024, 12:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: US, AZ
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
It depends on your priorities. If you want to enjoy a fun, spirited drive and potentially participate in track days or car meets, building the Corolla for speed could be more rewarding. However, if you prioritize daily driving efficiency and saving money on fuel, opting for a fuel-efficient build might be the better choice. Since you need a new engine and transmission, you can explore options like a smaller, modern engine for better fuel economy or a performance engine if speed is your goal.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to a7p6zy For This Useful Post:
Isaac Zachary (08-13-2024)
Old 08-14-2024, 07:45 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,096

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,570 Times in 1,594 Posts
An efficient drivetrain isn't necessarily mutually exclusive to a fun ride. Some go-fast stuff hurts economy, but others help. It doesn't need to be all one or all the other.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
Gasoline Fumes (08-17-2024)
Old 08-14-2024, 08:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,687
Thanks: 8,143
Thanked 8,922 Times in 7,365 Posts
www.subcompactculture.com: The Small Cars of the Gambler 500
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2024, 01:56 AM   #6 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,913
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,694 Times in 1,512 Posts
With a RWD layout it's quite easier to drop an oversized engine if you're really into power, yet it also allows some other experiences more focused on fuel savings with Diesel engines for instance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2024, 10:32 AM   #7 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,415
Thanks: 538
Thanked 1,205 Times in 1,063 Posts
Are diesels actually that much more efficient anymore? Yes they have higher compression, more energy in the fuel........
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2024, 12:42 AM   #8 (permalink)
Y2kbug
 
y2kbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 36

1999 corolla - '99 Toyota Corolla CE
Team Toyota
90 day: 47.1 mpg (US)

03 dakota v6 2wd auto - '03 Dodge Dakota
Team Dodge
90 day: 18.69 mpg (US)

98 s10 - '99 Gmc S10
Thanks: 16
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Thanks for the replies! i have a toyota v8 and nissan manual trans i can put in it. Diesel engines interest me because i have not owned one before. I see people swapping the vw diesel engines in all sorts of vehicles but thats front wheel drive. I can't think of common rwd small diesel engines. My dad is good with 4age engines but they are quite expensive now and he recommends going with a cheaper engine. I guess i should probably stick to the v8 since already have most of the pieces and know people thats done it before.

Ive considered putting off road tires on my 1999 corolla but never the 85. I've driven the 99 25,000 miles so far this year. It would hurt me to tear up the car taking it offroading so i decided i probably shouldn't do that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2024, 01:56 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,687
Thanks: 8,143
Thanked 8,922 Times in 7,365 Posts
"I can't think of common rwd small diesel engines."
Quote:
Diesel Engines in Vanagons: Diaries of the Wounded - GoWesty
A proper AAZ 1.9 turbo diesel engine installation alone into an already diesel-powered Vanagon is about $7500. Then, on top of that, the gearing in the transaxle needs to be MUCH taller than for the waterboxer or stock 1.6 diesel in order to fully take advantage of the 1.9 liter torque and fuel economy.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2024, 02:12 AM   #10 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,913
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,694 Times in 1,512 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko View Post
Are diesels actually that much more efficient anymore? Yes they have higher compression, more energy in the fuel........
In such an ancient model, it might be easier to register it with some engine still free from most of those troublesome emissions-control devices.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com