11-03-2020, 09:49 PM
|
#181 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,312
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,584 Times in 2,845 Posts
|
Wasn't talking about population density.
We absolutely don't need emissions inspections in every state. If those 26% of people want emissions testing in their mega city, then they can have it.
The 50% of people who crammed them selves into about 2% of the land area don't need dictate what the rest of the country does based problems they created.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-03-2020, 10:47 PM
|
#182 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 13,046
Thanks: 4,379
Thanked 4,558 Times in 3,504 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Wasn't talking about population density.
We absolutely don't need emissions inspections in every state. If those 26% of people want emissions testing in their mega city, then they can have it.
The 50% of people who crammed them selves into about 2% of the land area don't need dictate what the rest of the country does based problems they created.
|
OR has some DEQ counties and most don't. The DEQ counties hold the majority of the population. Fine by me. Funnily enough, my "mom's" car has always been registered in an non-DEQ county.
|
|
|
11-04-2020, 12:34 AM
|
#183 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,623
Thanks: 330
Thanked 2,170 Times in 1,467 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Wasn't talking about population density.
We absolutely don't need emissions inspections in every state. If those 26% of people want emissions testing in their mega city, then they can have it.
The 50% of people who crammed them selves into about 2% of the land area don't need dictate what the rest of the country does based problems they created.
|
What matters is where people live not acres of land. Land doesn't get asthma from air pollution - kids do.
It isn't just the 10 largest metros that have air quality issues. I used to live in Birmingham, AL. 49th largest metro area in the USA with 1.1 million people. Horrible air quality.
|
|
|
11-04-2020, 03:48 AM
|
#184 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,312
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,584 Times in 2,845 Posts
|
The government needs to make sure it's vehicles causing the air pollution then if the people decide they want emissions testing, then let them have it.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
11-05-2020, 05:30 AM
|
#185 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,647
Thanks: 77
Thanked 713 Times in 452 Posts
|
I'm thinking emissions zones is the solution here.
You could get a vehicle that is cheaper, more fuel efficient and less of a hassle to maintain - but you can't take it in to the bigger cities.
EV-ERs could have very cheap range extenders and still go into cities in EV-mode, but they would have to be constructed such that the use of the range extender is easily noticeable from outside, so it can be policed. (Could be just that the exhaust need to have some minimum loudness.)
__________________

2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
11-05-2020, 09:45 AM
|
#186 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,574
Thanks: 597
Thanked 1,254 Times in 1,106 Posts
|
So you're proposing the London method of control. Wonder how that would go in a place where the decision to wear face masks is a major freaking social issue.
|
|
|
11-05-2020, 11:39 AM
|
#187 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 13,046
Thanks: 4,379
Thanked 4,558 Times in 3,504 Posts
|
We already have zones in essence. In Oregon there is something like 3 counties that require yearly DEQ inspection, and the rest do not.
Give authority to the most specific (smallest) governing body capable of handling the issues that are particular to them.
|
|
|
11-05-2020, 11:30 PM
|
#188 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,623
Thanks: 330
Thanked 2,170 Times in 1,467 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
We already have zones in essence. In Oregon there is something like 3 counties that require yearly DEQ inspection, and the rest do not.
Give authority to the most specific (smallest) governing body capable of handling the issues that are particular to them.
|
The Oregon Portland Metro area requires auto emission testing because we failed national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for decades. As of 2017 we are no longer in violation but Oregon has decided to keep DEQ inspections in order to stay in compliance. Better to stay in compliance than be under a federal mandate and review.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-06-2020, 12:03 AM
|
#189 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 13,042
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,720 Times in 1,534 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev
I'm thinking emissions zones is the solution here.
|
I take it with a grain of salt.
Quote:
You could get a vehicle that is cheaper, more fuel efficient and less of a hassle to maintain - but you can't take it in to the bigger cities.
|
Considering how some vehicles are singled out as unsuitable for traffic inside the emission zones based on age and stock emission ratings, it becomes quite objectionable when some newer models compliant to current Euro standards have an engine which is basically the same as the one fitted to the "obsolete" older one. Even though some emissions control devices are in fact a PITA, had the European Union and its member states not being so strict when it comes to vehicle certification, presumably some folks would rather get a replacement engine rated at a more advanced standard once their stock engine is due to an overhaul. Or to try some other way to overcome the emissions issue, such as experiences with water injection (or alcohol).
|
|
|
11-06-2020, 01:52 PM
|
#190 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 13,046
Thanks: 4,379
Thanked 4,558 Times in 3,504 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH
The Oregon Portland Metro area requires auto emission testing because we failed national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for decades. As of 2017 we are no longer in violation but Oregon has decided to keep DEQ inspections in order to stay in compliance. Better to stay in compliance than be under a federal mandate and review.
|
How long do you think DEQ will be around after significant EV market penetration? Any prediction for what year we would drop DEQ?
|
|
|
|