Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-04-2014, 12:38 PM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: na
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 277
Thanked 218 Times in 185 Posts
Saturn sky redline engine and tranny for a sleeper. A S-10 2.2 with 5 spd would be economical.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-04-2014, 05:59 PM   #22 (permalink)
EcoRookie
 
23baseball3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 21

Joan ('95 Buick Skylark) - '95 Buick Skylark Custom Sport
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gealii View Post
Keep in mind ive driven 100hp - 230hp cars in NEO for 5 years and 100hp is enough . I can agree 61mph is not a high enough top speed, but there is not a need to go faster.
I agree that 100 HP is enough, but the Chevette has about half of that at best. Most Dyno test to well under 50 at the wheels, and about 40-50 at the crank.

A Skyline engine/transmission would be awesome. The s10 drivetrain is a good choice too. I'll look into that one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
Chevettes are like the four-square LEGO block: it ain't big, but lots of stuff can be snapped onto it to make something more.
That's a great way to put it.
__________________
Dominic

Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. -Einstein

Team Buick
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2014, 04:30 AM   #23 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: winterpeg, manisnowba
Posts: 211

clank - '99 jeep tj sport
90 day: 17.32 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck View Post
Why not ?

1984 Chevette - 1.6L 65hp inline 4, 2000lbs, manual trans. Consumer Guide testers managed "an honest 29 mpg in the city and 39 mpg on the highway." with a cd=0.42

1989 Buick Park Ave -3.8L 165hp V6, 3339lbs, slush box. 19 mpg city - 30mpg highway, with a cd=.40

Lets see.

With a manual trans. fuel injection and a 100 additional horsepower in a car that weighs 1300 lb. less than what the v6 came out of, with nearly a identical coefficient of drag ,it could easily be expected to deliver high mpgs.

A big plus is that nearly all GM products (engines and transmissions ) are interchangeable.

A GM 60 degree V6 is a direct drop in.

The 3.8 however is a 90 degree. It would require a little more work. (exhaust)


This is the way I see it.


1980's Chevette = dirt cheap

1990's GM V6 = cheap

Having a inexpensive classic 1980's eco box that hauls a$$ and gets great mpg

= Priceless




>
considering there is atleast 5 very different bellhousing patterns that gm has used over the years in north america; just swaping the 3.8l would be a problem(bop or scb) and that the chevette uses really wierd engines to begin with.

best bet for a 3.8l swap would be to get a wrecked f-body.(only modern fuel injected rwd 3.8l)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2014, 07:01 AM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldlobo View Post
considering there is atleast 5 very different bellhousing patterns that gm has used over the years in north america; just swaping the 3.8l would be a problem(bop or scb) and that the chevette uses really wierd engines to begin with.

best bet for a 3.8l swap would be to get a wrecked f-body.(only modern fuel injected rwd 3.8l)
Yes, yes.

I was just generalizing for comparison.

>
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2014, 11:37 AM   #25 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 54
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Just incase you questioned the anything will fit in there

Video: What Is That Thing? Chevette? Why Does It Sound Like That? - StreetLegalTV.com
427 Big block. Go big or go home
Ok not sure you could get any descent MPG out of it but it would not be to slow.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ron22 For This Useful Post:
digital rules (04-05-2014)
Old 04-05-2014, 02:33 PM   #26 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,154

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
I think you are in the wrong forum, you'll be lucky to have half a tank left after driving home from the gas station! That's would be a scary car to drive, probably have to replace the rear tires every month, probably brakes them loose in top gear at highway speed. I still think a turbo v8 Fiero would be funner to drive, at least it would get some traction and handle and not all smoking tires. The Vega was designed for a Wankel engine, which GM never got working. I can hear the owner. I said 427 Corvette, not Chevette!
__________________
- Tony


Last edited by arcosine; 04-05-2014 at 02:44 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2014, 03:36 PM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,256
Thanks: 24,382
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
faster

Quote:
Originally Posted by 23baseball3 View Post
I'm looking at some dirt cheap Chevettes and I was wondering what should be done to them. The pitiful horsepower ratings don't help but they are efficient. What engine/transmission swap ideas do you have? Or rear end swaps? Obviously a boat tail or a kammback would work out well too, a grille block, a lower front valence, pizza pans. But what could be done to the drivetrain? I love saving gas but I need to move faster. If I found one with a T-5 that would be nice of course but they're not too common.
If your faster means cruise velocity rather than acceleration,consider reducing your road horsepower requirement first, with aero and rolling resistance.Then if unsatisfied,go after the power train.
My standard-power, streamlined pickup has better HWY mpg than early,lighter,smaller diesels.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
mikeyjd (04-05-2014)
Old 04-05-2014, 03:51 PM   #28 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,864
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,683 Times in 1,501 Posts
The 1.4L turbocharged engine from the Cruze might be nice too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2014, 09:47 AM   #29 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,154

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
A 100 hp engine is quite enough to cruse at 80 mph in my saturn, in fact I have 180 degree air going in so its probably only 80 hp.



__________________
- Tony


Last edited by arcosine; 04-06-2014 at 09:56 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2014, 10:10 AM   #30 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Musta been a diesel Tempo- sheesh.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com