02-21-2011, 02:10 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Chevrolet Cruze ECO: 58 mpg (US) @ 55 mph
They don't provide enough details to make a judgement on how accurate these figures are, but...
Quote:
Driving the Eco: 58 MPG
We were very surprised to see that Chevy's claims are very conservative and that this car can reach a range that is, for a non-hybrid and non-diesel, absolutely ridiculous, in a positive way.
- Our stop-and-go driving gave us 32.3 MPG,
- our suburban driving with a mix of streets ended up at 39.8 MPG.
- Extremely careful cruising on the interstate at exactly 55 MPH resulted in a stunning 57.9 MPG.
- If you take advantage of the slipstream of a semi-truck (which we, of course, do not recommend), you can easily approach 65 MPG.
|
Source: Chevy Cruze Eco: 58 MPG, No Hybrid Magic (GM)
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
02-21-2011, 03:10 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Also, we're missing important info like ambient conditions (temp, wind).
Traffic conditions: 58 mpg on a busy interstate is easier than on an empty interstate, all else being equal ("Corridor effect").
|
|
|
|
|
02-21-2011, 04:56 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
|
Nice. Looks like some folks were hypermiling, although they didn't use the term. 58 is 38% over 42, which is impressive.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
02-21-2011, 05:41 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 16
Thanked 677 Times in 302 Posts
|
That 65mpg achieved while drafting gives a good indication of its aeromodding potential which its tall gearing enables you to take full advantage of.
|
|
|
|
|
02-21-2011, 09:49 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 75
Versa - '12 Nissan Versa Hatchback S 90 day: 39.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
If only my finances could afford the payment. Maybe after deployment. I don't go over 55mph to and from work. It happens to be a 50 mile one way trip to and from work. It would be fantastic to use less than 2 gallons of gas a day!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 12:02 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
You'd be pretty close to that if you just got a used Civic/Corolla/Fit/Yaris/Echo.
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 10:26 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Driving the TurboWeasel
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Steuben County, NY
Posts: 459
Thanks: 14
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
|
The Cruze Eco 6MT is tops on the short list for replacing my Buick in a couple of years. Getting high-40's MPG sounds great to me!
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco 6MT
|
|
|
|
|
02-23-2011, 02:56 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490
Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6 90 day: 31.12 mpg (US) Red - '00 Honda Insight Prius - '05 Toyota Prius 3 - '18 Tesla Model 3 90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
|
The big economic problem is that it'll take a long time to pay off the difference between a used corolla/etc and a new Cruz Eco at ~$200 in savings per year (~12k all highway miles). When they've depreciated a fair bit in 5-10 years, then the higher mileage becomes more prominent, but until then anything that's well broken in and gets above 40mpg tends to be good enough.
|
|
|
|
|
