Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-15-2008, 03:56 AM   #1 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,559
Thanks: 2,849
Thanked 1,111 Times in 673 Posts
Chevy Volt .Cd drops 30 %

Apparently Cherolet has realized that a low drag count is important after all.
http://news.windingroad.com/concept-...cient-of-drag/

A quote from the article : "Aerodynamics can give a much larger boost to the range of an EV than decreasing the weight of the vehicle. These results were fascinating and hold true in both city and highway driving conditions. This is why the current shape of the Volt is 30 percent more aerodynamic than that of the concept. The Voltís design is still far from approval for production, and there are 45 people dedicated to the design "

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-15-2008, 04:02 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina SK Canada
Posts: 407

Red Jeep Patriot - '07 Jeep Patriot
90 day: 25.14 mpg (US)

Beige Ford Ranger - '95 Ford Ranger XLE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Oh wow! It actually LOOKS much better too!



It reminds me of the current Honda Civics! :

Has GM seen the light??

Last edited by Peakster; 03-15-2008 at 04:19 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 02:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
Red
Master EcoModder
 
Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 713
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Much nicer, less like a squished Camero
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 02:45 PM   #4 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,184

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,486
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,540 Posts
Quote:
In fact, GM offers more fuel efficient vehicles than any other manufacturer, in part due to vehicle design and GM’s aerodynamic development capabilities.
Woah... someones been hitting the crack pipe a little too much before writing their articles.

I know a lot of the guys on cmpg were complaining about the volts horrid aerodynamics before. This should cheer them up.

Other than that I like the new look. I also agree with Peakster that it looks quite Hondaish.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 03:26 PM   #5 (permalink)
I"m not lurking!
 
s2man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 128

Porthos - '96 Chevrolet Cavalier
90 day: 31.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Woah... someones been hitting the crack pipe a little too much before writing their articles.
The same payola which got them all those green vehicle awards, I assume.
__________________
Roll on,
Stew

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 05:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
Liberti
 
LostCause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California
Posts: 504

Thunderbird - '96 Ford Thunderbird
90 day: 27.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Wasn't the original Volt the concept car? I think it was smart to create a driving brick that gained public attention. Once people want the car, then you can water it down for production.

I bet if GM could, though, they would have left it a driving brick. Nice to see technology limitations forcing efficiency. GM must have already known the importance of drag. Didn't the EV1 have a cD of ~0.17?

I bet we are witnessing the battle of designers vs. engineers.

- LostCause
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 06:40 PM   #7 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,463

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 55.97 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 61.17 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,000
Thanked 6,899 Times in 3,579 Posts
EV1 = 0.19

I remember leaving a comment at ABG when the Volt was originally unveiled: "Who Killed the Aerodynamicist?"

GM has shown they're capable of some truly impressive design work when the aerodynamicists are allowed to tell the stylists to go stuff it.

I'm still bothered by the fact that the chief designer/stylist has spouted off in the press that he wants to make the car look like something "you don't have to apologize for". If aero efficiency demands apologies, they need to put their marketing department to work.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 10:23 PM   #8 (permalink)
Who
UnderModded
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 319

Pablo - '07 Hyundai Santa Fe AWD
90 day: 23.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I always wonder how many manufacturers even strive for aerodynamics. Lexus sure does. Hyundai sure doesn't - they're simply styled based on the competition looks in that market segment.

Weight and Cda are pretty good performance metrics for potential efficiency yet how many manufacturers put the Cda in with their specs for all models?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 11:08 PM   #9 (permalink)
Awesomeness personified
 
AndrewJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 642

Harold - '94 Honda Civic CX
90 day: 54.51 mpg (US)

Margot - '08 Surly Big Dummy
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 18 Posts
Send a message via AIM to AndrewJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who View Post
I always wonder how many manufacturers even strive for aerodynamics. Lexus sure does. Hyundai sure doesn't
Well, while I get your jist, you have to look at the motivations of your two examples. Lexus wants a very low interior noise level, which is helped massively by a lower Cd. Hyundai, on the other hand, just wants to capitalize on the latest styling trends to help move some cars.

But, back to the point, there are some rather strange choices in aerodynamics among different auto companies.

For example, the 1st gen Ford Taurus, it had a Cd of only .29 (.28 for the Mercury Sable) even though keeping the low Cd provided no tangible benefit in the marketplace. If you remember, the sleek-styling was a selling point, and we all know that "sleek-styling" doesn't have to mean a low Cd.
Even with the Taurus's lower aerodynamic drag it's mileage was only 2mpg or 10% better than the Ford LTD it replaced (21mpg vs 19mpg), even with smaller engines and an extra gear in the transmission. So, we can gather that it's increased FE wasn't an enormous selling point.

__________________
"I got 350 heads on a 305 engine. I get 10 miles to the gallon. I ain't got no good intentions." - The Drive By Truckers.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video: Weird chevy volt ad SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 10 09-18-2008 03:08 PM
Chevy Volt battery production starting in late 2009? SVOboy Fossil Fuel Free 9 03-04-2008 09:35 PM
Chevy Volt Commerical Lazarus The Lounge 21 01-14-2008 08:48 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com