Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-09-2022, 04:26 PM   #1 (permalink)
Righteous Imaginarian
 
Talos Woten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Aliquippa PA
Posts: 107

Champrius v3.2 - '09 Toyota Prius
90 day: 58.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 103 Times in 53 Posts
Arrow Aeromods must transfer force to be effective

That means they should be rigid and firmly affixed. I originally thought that getting the shape right was the most important thing. It turns out we want both, but the force transfer is paramount. An aeromod that isn't transferring force isn't doing much, and might even be counterproductive.

More thoughts and pressure stats here:
https://www.instagram.com/p/Cel1DD-L1K1/

__________________
Currently building Champrius 4.0! Follow starting here:
https://www.instagram.com/p/CeeL6xyFp-k/

and ask in depth questions here:
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post669277

The goal is 70 mpg this time around.

Stats from Champrius v3.2:
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Talos Woten For This Useful Post:
mpgmike (06-23-2022)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-09-2022, 05:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,005

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 42.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,866
Thanked 2,501 Times in 1,547 Posts
I'm not certain. A tonneau cover can simply cover a void, isolating the air under it, and cut drag. I suppose there is force transfer going on there, but it doesn't seem proportional and mostly would be preventing the venturi effect by separating high and low pressure air. I haven't fully wrapped my head around the physics of it though.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-13-2022)
Old 06-09-2022, 05:56 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
rigid shape

The 'big-boys' call it aeroelasticity.
Forces acting on an under-engineered profile can actually deform it into a lifting panel, which subsequently rises to an angle of attack aggressive enough to get to burble point, then stall. The panel falls below the critical angle which initiated lift, and the 'system' begins the lift/stall cycle all over again, leading to the cyclic deformation known as 'flutter', which can bring an aircraft down.
Depending on the material, the degree of deformation, and the natural frequency, or harmonics of that frequency, the panel will just self-destruct.
There are YouTubes of model, Lockheed C-130 Hercules coming apart in a wind tunnel.
The easiest solution, yet the most difficult to fabricate, are 'compound' surfaces, where they curve in three axes. Like a hen's egg. The strongest and lightest structures have compound surfaces .
Most contemporary automobiles have some degree of compounding to their sheet metal. Strong and light!
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
COcyclist (07-08-2022), Ecky (06-09-2022), freebeard (06-09-2022), mpgmike (06-23-2022), pgfpro (06-10-2022), redpoint5 (06-09-2022)
Old 06-09-2022, 06:44 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
A worst case would be a hoop and tarpaulin cover on a military truck.

I was driving through Northern California in the 1970s when as I met a Lincoln convertible the top tore loose at the header and turned into a roll-back as we passed.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-13-2022)
Old 06-09-2022, 06:54 PM   #5 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,396

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,192
Thanked 4,380 Times in 3,354 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
The 'big-boys' call it aeroelasticity.
Forces acting on an under-engineered profile can actually deform it into a lifting panel, which subsequently rises to an angle of attack aggressive enough to get to burble point, then stall. The panel falls below the critical angle which initiated lift, and the 'system' begins the lift/stall cycle all over again, leading to the cyclic deformation known as 'flutter', which can bring an aircraft down.
Depending on the material, the degree of deformation, and the natural frequency, or harmonics of that frequency, the panel will just self-destruct.
There are YouTubes of model, Lockheed C-130 Hercules coming apart in a wind tunnel.
The easiest solution, yet the most difficult to fabricate, are 'compound' surfaces, where they curve in three axes. Like a hen's egg. The strongest and lightest structures have compound surfaces .
Most contemporary automobiles have some degree of compounding to their sheet metal. Strong and light!
That's the most readable post I've seen from you to date. No bullet points, and something resembling paragraph organization.

Last weekend I pulled a 16ft canoe on a trailer, mostly utilizing the canoe as extra storage, but also hoping to take it on the lake. I had all 4 interior sections filled with totes and tents, then covered the whole thing with 2 tarps. I tried to get them as taught as I could, but there was still some flutter at the end since it tapers so much creating that compound curve.

Seemed to be pretty aero though, as flat cruising didn't appear to suffer much in the way of fuel economy loss.

Next purchase I'm looking at a hitch mounted cargo platform for those instances where I just need more space, but not a boat. I'm torn between a sturdier looking lower profile, or the utility of higher walls.



__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-13-2022)
Old 06-09-2022, 07:36 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 57

The silver bullet - '01 Saturn S Sohc 5 speed
90 day: 40.84 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 24 Times in 15 Posts
In aeronautics there's really two kinds of drag

Induced drag and parasite drag

Everything related to induced drag would be load bearing this is the drag from the airfoil form

Parasitic drag could be load bearing. But it can also not be any more complicated than keeping air out of cowlings and spaces. Or not installing some thing onto the fuselage that protrudes into the slipstream. It is actually OK to use tape on commercial aircraft in some of these instances

A good example on our cars would be anything perpendicular to the airflow will need to be rigid enough to not flutter which would be worse than it not being there

Anything parallel to the airflow like a wheel skirt also doesn't need to flutter but at the same time sees much lower aerodynamic loads
__________________
Too much junk to list. From a 10mpg caddy limo to a 5 speed Saturn



  Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to R.W.Dale For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-13-2022), Blacktree (06-10-2022), Ecky (06-09-2022), steve05ram360 (06-10-2022)
Old 06-10-2022, 05:03 PM   #7 (permalink)
Righteous Imaginarian
 
Talos Woten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Aliquippa PA
Posts: 107

Champrius v3.2 - '09 Toyota Prius
90 day: 58.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 103 Times in 53 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
I'm not certain. A tonneau cover can simply cover a void, isolating the air under it, and cut drag. I suppose there is force transfer going on there, but it doesn't seem proportional and mostly would be preventing the venturi effect by separating high and low pressure air. I haven't fully wrapped my head around the physics of it though.
Okay. Let me say it differently. The effectiveness of an aeromod is directly related to how well it can transfer force. I've made the bold claim that we want rigid aeromods, but the more accurate statement is: if we had two aeromods of the same basic shape, one rigid and one floppy, the rigid one will perform better. And there is a cap to the rigidity we need, i.e. the maximum amount of force that aeromod transfers onto the car frame under operating conditions.

Now, it's definitely the case that non-rigid surfaces can effectively harness aerodynamics. There are many examples: parachutes, kites, etc. And you are correct that a tonneau cover does, in fact, reduce drag. My statement is: if you put a rigid frame under the tonneau cover so that it more effectively transferred force onto the truck in addition to the fasteners, it would perform better. If you replaced the ribbed tonneau cover with an aerodynamically shaped bed cover that was made of rigid fiberglass or somesuch, it would perform even better. And if you calculated the total force on that cover due to aero and engineered it to withstand it, that would be the best it can do (rigidity-wise).

The reason I mention this is I originally had some "loose" elements in my design, expecting the wind to shape them into the optimal curve. Which it did. But because those elements were loose, I wasn't getting the full benefit of the aeromod, because the wind was spending it's energy into deforming my surface instead of into smoothing and diverting it's own flow.

Most importantly, I've now realized that the optimal forces that I want on the vehicle were the opposite of what I was expecting. An aerofoil has a big push back right along the tip of the nose... and then is pulled outward by lower pressures at all other points. That means that surfaces (like my belly pan) which I though I needed to design to be pushed up I actually needed to make sure could be pulled down. That requires a significantly different bracing strategy that I was using before.

Anyhoo, I hope that's clearer. I'm not saying loose elements do nothing; Champrius 3.0 was a loose design and it got me past 60 mpg. I'm saying tighter more rigid elements do better. I'm hoping that it gets me past 70 mpg this time around.
__________________
Currently building Champrius 4.0! Follow starting here:
https://www.instagram.com/p/CeeL6xyFp-k/

and ask in depth questions here:
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post669277

The goal is 70 mpg this time around.

Stats from Champrius v3.2:
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Talos Woten For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-20-2022), Ecky (06-10-2022)
Old 06-11-2022, 06:26 AM   #8 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,244

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 259
Thanked 803 Times in 391 Posts
3mm abs engine undertray will fail at about 180km/h speed unless its not reinforced.

Install few metal L-bars to make it stronger and you are good to go faster.
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vekke For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-20-2022), freebeard (06-11-2022)
Old 06-13-2022, 05:22 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
tonneau cover

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
I'm not certain. A tonneau cover can simply cover a void, isolating the air under it, and cut drag. I suppose there is force transfer going on there, but it doesn't seem proportional and mostly would be preventing the venturi effect by separating high and low pressure air. I haven't fully wrapped my head around the physics of it though.
As far as automakers are concerned, pickup trucks are just large sedans, without a trunklid.
Flow separates off the rear of the roof, and there's nothing to reattach to.
There's no pressure recovery.
High drag and high lift.
A tonneau cover is essentially a 'trunklid.'
If it's sufficiently close enough, vertically, and sufficiently 'far' longitudinally, it provides a surface for reattachment.
A vortex is captured on top of it, and the outer free stream will skim over the 'locked-vortex' as if it were a solid structure, plus 'touch' the back of the cover before separating.
If 'smoked', you'd see streamline filaments diverging as they decelerated down the 'contour' of the vortex, picking up pressure as they lost velocity.
This is the drag reduction.The higher pressure is communicated to the base, behind the tailgate, raising the base pressure, which lowers the pressure drag, the largest component of aerodynamic drag; and why we streamline.
And since slower, higher pressure air impacts the rear of the tonneau, it also kills most of the rear lift.
A 'half-tonneau' works better due to reattachment, plus the low pressure of the vortex core telegraphing under the cover, to the forward face of the tailgate, increasing the pressure differential between the front and rear face.
GM has the US Patent on it.
If you watch a vinyl cover, you'll notice a dip at the rear where air is attacking it.
At the front, behind the cab, it will look like Yoda's under there trying to get out, creating an upwards bulge in the fabric. Highs and lows.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Ecky (06-13-2022)
Old 06-13-2022, 06:24 PM   #10 (permalink)
Righteous Imaginarian
 
Talos Woten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Aliquippa PA
Posts: 107

Champrius v3.2 - '09 Toyota Prius
90 day: 58.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 103 Times in 53 Posts
This video gives a good feel for the relative pressures around a typical modern car, which directly translate into the forces one should account for.

Enjoy!

__________________
Currently building Champrius 4.0! Follow starting here:
https://www.instagram.com/p/CeeL6xyFp-k/

and ask in depth questions here:
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post669277

The goal is 70 mpg this time around.

Stats from Champrius v3.2:
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Talos Woten For This Useful Post:
Ecky (06-13-2022)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com