Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-29-2018, 02:13 PM   #51 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,520
Thanks: 8,073
Thanked 8,870 Times in 7,322 Posts
You can stand the shoeboxes on end for the test. What kind of thermometers? I still need to replace my infrared remote thermometer; one would work fine for this.

__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-29-2018, 04:20 PM   #52 (permalink)
Permanent Lurker
 
seifrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Czechoslovakia (sort of), Europe
Posts: 348

Dáčenka - '10 Dacia / Renault Logan MCV 1.5 dCi (X90 k9k)
90 day: 47.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 198 Times in 92 Posts
Standard oven thermometer should do, just make sure the tip/needle is inside and scale/display is outside the box so you do not need to open it. I have two thermometers with thermistor on 1 m long cord and I plan to use them, when I have spare timine.

The reason behind white roofs is safety regulation, I guess. I asked local police about chrome roof and the answer was i would get pulled over for blinding other drivers.

To CrippleRooster: actually, as far as I know, better than Land Rover white roof was their tropical roof. Essentially white metal roof about one inch above normal roof. It reflects sun radiation and the one-inch air gap prevents heat to be conducted to the car. Images can be found on Google, one example from ipocars.com:




If you have spare white coroplast sheet, attach it to the roof rails and call it good enough.

Last edited by seifrob; 07-30-2018 at 03:53 AM.. Reason: grammar
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2018, 12:37 PM   #53 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 29
Thanks: 11
Thanked 16 Times in 9 Posts
This is great.

On the flip side, get a matt black wrap for winter, to get the heat in and stop wasting warm up times and engine heat into the cabin.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2018, 03:21 AM   #54 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gumby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Butte, Montana
Posts: 726

little jona - '91 Dodge D 250 first gen cummins LE
Team Streamliner
90 day: 23.4 mpg (US)

Little Jona airo modded - '91 Dodge RAM 3/4 TON D 250 2×4 AUTO
Pickups
Team Cummins
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

The Salted Hound Jenny. - '87 Dodge Ram 50/D-50 5sp 4X4
90 day: 20.24 mpg (US)

Jona Allison aero - '91 Dodge Ram D-250 Le
90 day: 20.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 208
Thanked 428 Times in 279 Posts
It took 2 things to make the A/C up to task in Las Vegas summers on my grandparents '61 GMC short wide1/2t 1 White roof 2 small back window.

Chrome vinyl should be much better then chromed metal. The base material in the vinyl is insulative. Where is Chrome metal and mylar both lose out when they're in physical contact with the cold side.

Yeti used copper lining on the outside of the inner wall on there cups. BLOTER REDUX: YETI HOW IT WORKSAvE did it tear down on one and explain the copper lining insted of typical chrome.
__________________
1st gen cummins 91.5 dodge d250 ,HX35W/12/6 QSV
ehxsost manafulld wrap, Aero Tonto
best tank: distance 649gps mi 24.04 mpg 27.011usg
Best mpg : 31.32mpg 100mi 3.193 USG 5/2/20


Former
'83 GMC S-15 Jimmy 2door 2wd O/D auto 3.73R&P
'79 Chevy K20 4X4 350ci 400hp msd custom th400 /np205. 7.5-new 14mpg modded befor modding was a thing
87' Hyundai Excel
83 ranger w/87 2.9 L FI2wd auto 18mpg on the floor
04 Mitsubishi Gallant 2.4L auto 26mpg
06 Subaru Forrester XT(WRX PACKAGE) MT AWD Turbocharged 18 plying dirty best of 26mpg@70mph
95Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 14-18mpg
04 Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 16-22mpg


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2018, 11:46 PM   #55 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
When you do your experiments just remember that infrared thermometers are not accurate on reflective surfaces. From Omega:

"In general, the higher the emissivity of an object, the easier it is to obtain an accurate temperature measurement using infrared. Objects with very low emissivities (below 0.2) can be difficult applications. Some polished, shiny metallic surfaces, such as aluminum, are so reflective in the infrared that accurate temperature measurements are not always possible."
Remember, we are not launching space craft or building medical equipment.

A polished metal pot with boiling water in it shows 99.9*C. I call that close enough.

The only time it's a problem is if you aim at a mirror and there's a heat source in the reflection. IR from the heat source is reflected into your lens, so the temp reading will only be hotter.

Here's a photo of two mirrors, left inside at the same temperature:



One has a matte vinyl backing to the camera. Extreme opposites of the emissivity range. There's at most a 1*C variation between the two. Any heat source reflecting off the mirror would be immediately obvious.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	flir_20180730T121611.jpg
Views:	210
Size:	313.3 KB
ID:	24627  
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2018, 11:53 PM   #56 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
As do school bus manufacturers
That's like saying manufactures prefer not to use full boat tails, as though a pure single function is the only goal.

The bus is white because chrome would add thousands to the cost of each bus for virtually no benefit.


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
NASA and SpaceX seem to prefer white.
Nope. I've never seen a satelite painted white. They often spend a lot of money on real gold for the lowest possible emissivity (0.05).



Rockets are white for cost, simplicity and/or simple practicality reasons. A cheap chrome wrap probably won't stand up to mach 30.

The whole emissivity argument is probably a non starter anyway since there's no real chrome in chrome wrap. The top layer at least is plastic which has the same emmisivity as car clear coat.
__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 08-02-2018 at 12:31 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2018, 12:18 AM   #57 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by seifrob View Post
The only valid test should be performed so: take two identic cars, one with chrome roof, one with white. Put them on the parking lot, put a milkjug full of water in each car, immerse thermometers in milkjugs, measure temperatures every 10 minutes or so. Compare curves.
Ecomodder plausible test: take two identic shoeboxes or banana boxes, chrome top and white top. Take half litre bottle instead of a jug, use the same procedure.
When you park a black car in the sun, vs a white car, you only see a few *C difference.

https://www.racq.com.au/~/media/pdf/...rvey_2009.ashx

They recorded only a 3*C delta between near black and white. Since white and chrome a much closer in performance, the delta would be within your margin or error.

The paint surface temperature between white and black can be around 40*C, where as white vs chrome is under 10*C.

Here's chrome on a white panel that I cut out of my old van:



Frankly, you don't need any test, you can easily feel the difference by hand. How much it affects interior temperature is another thing. I did my install on a van without any headliner (which would then get very hot solar panels on top), a black Jeep without headliner and an almost black car with headliner. Basically all worst case scenarios.

If you've got a silver car and a decent headliner, you'll probably see no measurable benefit. For example I insulated my doors, and the IR shows no difference.

You might notice a conspicuous absence of window tint testing (two cars side by side) on line. I can only conclude that such results are underwhelming - even if surface testing is impressive:

https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...ted-35441.html

But this is ecomodder, where every bit adds up.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Copy of flir_20180202T155213.jpg
Views:	161
Size:	22.3 KB
ID:	24628  
__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 08-02-2018 at 01:21 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (08-02-2018)
Old 08-02-2018, 12:51 AM   #58 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by seifrob View Post
The reason behind white roofs is safety regulation, I guess. I asked local police about chrome roof and the answer was i would get pulled over for blinding other drivers.
It's about fashion & technology. In the 50s-60s (when white roofs were common pre A/C days) chrome wrap hadn't been invented. Actual chromium plated roofs would have been expensive.

Today wrap only lasts a few years, that's OK if you can DIY it, not so much for an OEM. Today's fashion happens to be for black painted roofs.

Ask your local police to show you the law that forbids chrome roofs. As them if it's the same one that bans large chrome moldings or polished tanker trucks.

Shadow chrome is also an option. It performs about half way between chrome and white - looks almost exactly like metallic grey paint.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2018, 03:39 AM   #59 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
... Shadow chrome is also an option. It performs about half way between chrome and white - looks almost exactly like metallic grey paint.
I read the test article in the post above that you linked. Thanks. Seems tint and paint can each reduce internal peak temps by a few percent. I guess that is something, but I think those tests miss the fact that when a car is in motion the wind is cooling the car surface. White, black, pink, purple... at 60 mph does it really matter anymore? Tint on the other hand prevents heat from entering the car at any speed.

But I need a clarification: are you saying Shadow Chrome is heat rejecting/reflective? If so, what brands?
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2018, 05:22 PM   #60 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,864
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,683 Times in 1,501 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by seifrob View Post
actually, as far as I know, better than Land Rover white roof was their tropical roof. Essentially white metal roof about one inch above normal roof. It reflects sun radiation and the one-inch air gap prevents heat to be conducted to the car.
I've already seen a handful of those, but they're not so common here.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com