Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-08-2010, 03:13 PM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Independence, KY
Posts: 603

Blue Meanie - '02 Volkswagon Golf TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 48.52 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '05 WV Passat TDI

Rudy - '94 Chevy C2500
Thanks: 89
Thanked 47 Times in 44 Posts
Charge more in a purchase tax on the car when it is new if it pollutes more per gallon and increase the tax per gallon that will effectively do the same thing with out

__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.


"It's not rocket surgery!" -MetroMPG
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-08-2010, 03:14 PM   #22 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,701

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,275
Thanked 731 Times in 464 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varn View Post
This plan sounds like an elitist way of keeping poorer people out of the central city.
Not the poor, just the cars, or the most polluting ones. Notice, this is done only in cities that have a good public transport system and Park&Ride lots at the city limits. Less cars in the center, by taxing all of them (London) or just the most polluting ones (Germany), not only improves air quality (reduction of health expenses - finansed from taxes), but also improves public transport transit times, making it an even better option. In some cases, the money from the taxes is invested in making the transport system even better.

Even without taxes, a 90-day public trans ticket here costs less than one full tank of fuel. Most people I know fill up once a week.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom View Post
Charge more in a purchase tax on the car when it is new if it pollutes more per gallon and increase the tax per gallon that will effectively do the same thing with out
It's not just about taxing the polluting vehicles, it's also about keeping them out of the most congested areas. The more a car pollutes, the worse it is for the environment and for people.

I believe that cars should be taxed and/or not permitted into certain areas based on how dirty their emissions are, this should help people make cleaner decisions when buying/repairing their vehicles. But I also believe in taxing fuel, as this should be an incentive to use less, thereby further reducing pollution.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread

Last edited by Piwoslaw; 09-08-2010 at 03:25 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 04:18 PM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varn View Post
This plan sounds like an elitist way of keeping poorer people out of the central city.
The results in London were / are that the rich people happily drive their big SUV or other fancy gasguzzler into the city - or even bought an exempted Prius .
Meanwhile Mr & Mrs Doe were shoehorned into the busses and on the underground ...

The scheme was generating far too little money - as a lot went into running the ploy - so the area got expanded.


Similar things happen when cities alternatingly limit access to even or odd plates. Those rich enough buy new cars with custom licence plates so they have an even and an odd numbered car ...
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 04:26 PM   #24 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,701

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,275
Thanked 731 Times in 464 Posts
But if the money flows where it should, then the rich SUV drivers are funding cheaper tickets for everyone else.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 05:59 PM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
But if the money flows where it should, then the rich SUV drivers are funding cheaper tickets for everyone else.
If our cat was a cow, we could milk her

In this kind of schemes, the money is never going where it should ...
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2010, 09:09 PM   #26 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ivins UT
Posts: 213

the green machine :P - '97 Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ
90 day: 20.92 mpg (US)

Thee s10 - '00 Chevy S10
90 day: 24.27 mpg (US)

Freedom - '05 Kawasaki Ninja 250EX
90 day: 75.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 22 Times in 20 Posts
has anyone seen the article in the popular science magazine saying they could make gas by removing the co2 in the atmosphere and putting it through this process and it would cost like 4$ a gallon other then the price whats stopping them i mean u could have about 25% of our fuel being pulled from the atmosphere and have it that they can better the technology to reduce costs and all it would cost the people is an additional .27 cents
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2010, 09:49 PM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
The EPA tried something like this in Northwest Indiana in the mid-90s.

Cars over seven years old couldn't pass the tests without thousands in repairs - often more than the car was worth. Poorer people couldn't afford to get licenses.

People were bribing/intimidating test personnel. People were bribing BMV clerks for licenses despite their car couldn't pass the tests.

Finally people simply drove without proper registration. Cops in Gary wouldn't stop a car for no license.

The government finally gave up on that bad idea. As a result, we'll never see another "Inspection and Maintenance" program in Indiana.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2010, 10:15 PM   #28 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varn View Post
This plan sounds like an elitist way of keeping poorer people out of the central city.
or keeping them to more pedestrian forms of travel.
__________________

Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2010, 10:38 PM   #29 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Of Chicago
Posts: 127

Aveo - '08 Chevolet Aveo LS
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Personally I'd like to see american EPA regulations to limit emissions by the mile, not emissions by the gallon, aswell as having the maximum aerodynamic drag coefficient of all vehicles be .25...

SUVs still could survive, but they would be forced to be more efficient, aswell as their aero being less an issue.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 04:53 PM   #30 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Just what we need ... more regulations.

__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Article: Want cars to eat less? Put 'em on a diet MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 34 07-14-2013 01:38 AM
Project: Rebuilding an '01 Honda Insight as a nonhybrid Fabio Hybrids 158 01-12-2013 11:59 AM
Electric Cars Push Japan Engine Parts Makers to Crisis Mode tjts1 The Lounge 14 12-23-2012 12:47 PM
Fiat’s Small Cars to Take Over America, Too? SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 0 01-28-2009 06:01 AM
wheeldams - ideal average on production cars lunarhighway Aerodynamics 2 11-03-2008 12:22 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com