06-17-2009, 01:33 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 397
Thanks: 44
Thanked 68 Times in 45 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ
I mean come on... they grip so well that instead of sliding, they FLIP RIGHT OVER!
|
Disclaimer: Please do not take this post seriously.[/QUOTE]
I keep reading with agitation and wanting to respond with physics lessons - only to find its a joke.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw
A few months ago I returned home just as my neighbor pulled into his driveway. It was cold (around freezing) with some rain and sleet, and he yells to me: You rode your bike? In this weather?!?
So the other day we both returned home at the same time again, only now the weather is warm, sunny, with no wind. And I yell to him: You took the car? In this weather?!?
|
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-17-2009, 01:34 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
LOL - Sorry, friend. I should have made it more obvious that I was just responding to the previous sarcasm.. I'll fix it!
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
06-17-2009, 10:51 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by shovel
Driving a motorcycle in accordance with america's traffic laws endangers no-one but the person who chooses to ride the motorcycle, who as an adult can decide to travel on such a form of vehicle.
Huh?
|
Sure looks like a Peugot to me!
(Does that nullify the image as a response to driving according to American laws? )
|
|
|
06-18-2009, 11:44 AM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
I'm sure there has to be something in those laws about not running into other vehicles :-)
|
|
|
06-21-2009, 03:46 AM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
EtOH
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
|
To put it plainly the newer Honda sucks more, it just does it faster.
And kudos for the overall safety and not just safety in a collision. Politicians may use SUVs but those ones are modified armored vehicles compared to the civilian models. An APC is safer but it's less practical and luxurious to ride in. The same theory goes for armor as for vehicle size, there's always a bigger munition load out.
I prefer the barebones models. Manual everything, rubber interior, stock HP, spaceframe chassis. Road carver all the way. Manual adjustable suspension for passengers.
__________________
-Allch Chcar
Last edited by Allch Chcar; 06-23-2009 at 12:26 PM..
|
|
|
06-22-2009, 08:47 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99LeCouch
Same thing on the roads. Give people a "safer", more tank-like automobile. They'll still figure out some way of killing themselves in it. It's just going to take dumber driving.
|
I wish I could remember where I read this, but evidently if you check over the statistics our "safer cars" don't actually seem to have changed the fatality rates (per mile traveled). Not once you factor speeds and a few other things out of it. The theory espoused in the (article? book?) I was reading was that this was due to people driving to a "level of perceived risk".
So today's cars, with crumple zones and power disk ABS brakes and airbags and so on simply make people "push harder", leave less room to react, and so on. Which fits with my own (very unscientific!) observations pretty well.
-soD
|
|
|
06-22-2009, 08:59 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 593
Thanks: 106
Thanked 114 Times in 72 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by some_other_dave
I wish I could remember where I read this, but evidently if you check over the statistics our "safer cars" don't actually seem to have changed the fatality rates (per mile traveled). Not once you factor speeds and a few other things out of it. The theory espoused in the (article? book?) I was reading was that this was due to people driving to a "level of perceived risk".
So today's cars, with crumple zones and power disk ABS brakes and airbags and so on simply make people "push harder", leave less room to react, and so on. Which fits with my own (very unscientific!) observations pretty well.
-soD
|
werd, I know my girlie drives her quiet, isolating, no road feedback TL a hell of a lot faster than I feel comfortable with - when she was driving my old Trooper she drove it slow and carefully even though it was nowhere near stock and absolutely not the handling disaster that stock Troopers are.
People drive as fast as they feel safe driving, regardless of the speed limit or the road conditions. If you completely isolate them from the sensation of speed, they will continue accelerating until they feel like they're going somewhere. I think electric, or non-internal combustion cars will only increase this behavior.
|
|
|
06-23-2009, 11:01 AM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allch Chcar
About the picture. The car's driver probably felt they had the right-of-way and failed to yield it to the motorcycle. A motorcycle doesn't just run into a car at high speed for no reason. Unless the driver of the motorcycle was street racing. Darn kids.
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victim_blaming
Quote:
Originally Posted by shovel
werd, I know my girlie drives her quiet, isolating, no road feedback TL a hell of a lot faster than I feel comfortable with - when she was driving my old Trooper she drove it slow and carefully even though it was nowhere near stock and absolutely not the handling disaster that stock Troopers are.
|
Maybe we should install big metal spikes in the middle of every steering wheel. You know, to get people to slow down. LOL
Last edited by tjts1; 06-23-2009 at 11:09 AM..
|
|
|
06-23-2009, 12:18 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 397
Thanks: 44
Thanked 68 Times in 45 Posts
|
Victim blaming?
There's no way to know who was at fault. The driver of either vehicle could be the victim.
Metal spikes in the steering wheels sounds like a very very good idea.
I bet it won't catch on though...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw
A few months ago I returned home just as my neighbor pulled into his driveway. It was cold (around freezing) with some rain and sleet, and he yells to me: You rode your bike? In this weather?!?
So the other day we both returned home at the same time again, only now the weather is warm, sunny, with no wind. And I yell to him: You took the car? In this weather?!?
|
|
|
|
|