10-23-2018, 01:27 PM
|
#61 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler
Even harder to understand is why Arizona has very little solar given the National incentives that are currently available.
|
Q: Why?
A: Because of the idjiots on our Corporation Commission (politics, which we can't discuss).
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2018, 01:41 PM
|
#62 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,742
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man
A: Because of the idjiots on our Corporation Commission (politics, which we can't discuss).
|
Please elaborate. Idiot policy isn't politics anyhow, it's just a bad idea. Does the utility forbid grid-tie or something? I do know AZ is right-leaning. |
|
|
|
|
10-23-2018, 02:05 PM
|
#63 (permalink)
|
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
As far as I can tell, aside from California state politics don't seem to play into solar grid tie much.
It's more to do with the private energy providers.
Like out here, Excell energy which spans several states likes to make it difficult to do solar.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2018, 04:57 PM
|
#64 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
Why is this thread in the Fossil Fuel Free topic?
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2018, 05:27 PM
|
#65 (permalink)
|
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
Why is this thread in the Fossil Fuel Free topic?
|
It's literally in the first sentence of the original post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
a little discouragement or encouragement.
|
To encourage renewable and fissile fuel use and discourage large scale fossil fuel use, mainly coal if possible.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2018, 06:53 PM
|
#66 (permalink)
|
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,599
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,453 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
There should essentially be no solar in the PNW valley, except that the states lean very "eco" (eco in the sense that people mean well, but still don't act rationally) and probably has tax incentives to subsidize it, on top of whatever federal subsidy there is.....
|
I have a slightly different take. There is no rational reason that every new house in the USA doesn’t have rooftop solar. EVEN in the rainy PNW solar pays back in only 10 years without any incentives or tax credits. The rational time to install solar is when the house is constructed. |
|
|
|
|
10-23-2018, 07:07 PM
|
#67 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,742
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
|
If solar could provide 60+ years of weatherproof service, I'd rather spend extra to install it than crappy asphalt, which itself costs a fortune. I'm open to the idea, but I don't want a roof on top of a roof. That just doesn't make sense.
100 years later, why haven't we found an alternative to asphalt for roofing?
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2018, 07:13 PM
|
#68 (permalink)
|
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,599
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,453 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
If solar could provide 60+ years of weatherproof service, I'd rather spend extra to install it than crappy asphalt, which itself costs a fortune. I'm open to the idea, but I don't want a roof on top of a roof. That just doesn't make sense.
100 years later, why haven't we found an alternative to asphalt for roofing?
|
We have found an alternative- steel roofs. Last time I replaced my roof it added 10% to the cost but was expected to last twice as long as asphalt.
I do want a roof on a roof. Solar panels with an air gap shade the roof and reduce A/C use in the summer. |
|
|
|
|
10-23-2018, 07:16 PM
|
#69 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,742
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
|
I suppose a roof on top of a roof is fine, but I'd want the sub-roof to be cheaper and less durable, with the top layer still expected to be waterproof.
I'm a fan of metal roofs from a practical standpoint, but it stands out in neighborhoods. I'll probably go metal when I have a country home.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2018, 07:20 PM
|
#70 (permalink)
|
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,599
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,453 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
As far as I can tell, aside from California state politics don't seem to play into solar grid tie much.
It's more to do with the private energy providers.
Like out here, Excell energy which spans several states likes to make it difficult to do solar.
|
Solar is hugely political in every state. The battlefront is net metering. Do utilities have to pay customers for the electricity they product and feed back into the grid. Utilities want that electricity (produced at peak time) for free. Solar companies was utilities to pay peak rates. The most popular compromise seems to be kWh credits. The homeowner gets a credit for electricity produced and can use those credits when their production is lower than their needs and they pull from the grid. That should be an easy sell- the utility gets to trade inexpensive off peak electricity for expensive peak electricity. However it isn’t. Utilities are used to getting what they want since most have a monopoly.
|
|
|
|
|
