Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-20-2019, 02:46 PM   #1 (permalink)
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: NJ
Posts: 11

Jetter - '17 VW Jetta S Automatic
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cruise control using higher RPMs with CVT

I have a 2019 kia forte with 2.0 and CVT. I recently tried using cruise control on the highway at about 60mph. While in cruise control the engine speed was adjusted to about 400rpm higher than where it was when I was manually controlling the engine speed. I figured this could be because the computer knows this engine speed will yield greater fuel economy. Unfortunately, after testing the theory several times, this is not the case. I have a 10 mile commute home from work on a stretch of highway that has barely any traffic. On board computer, scanguage, and torque pro app all report same. Im going to be taking a 1000 mile trip soon and would like to use cruise control but not at the expense of fuel economy.
Anyone else experience this? Have thoughts?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

Old 12-20-2019, 02:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
mpg_numbers_guy's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Michigan/Virginia
Posts: 1,160

Insight - '06 Honda Insight MT
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 81.29 mpg (US)

Mom's Prius (my driving) - '08 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
Last 3: 60.96 mpg (US)

Insight Delivery Driving Log - '06 Honda Insight MT
90 day: 70.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 274
Thanked 382 Times in 292 Posts
It depends on the car. In my Insight, I suspect that cruise control would cost me 10-20 mpg on trips (normally gets 80-100+ mpg, so 10-20 MPG loss isn't that much). However, on my mom's Prius I find that the cruise control actually improves fuel economy by a decent amount over driving without it.

I suspect that most modern CVTs fall somewhere in between. Part of the reason cruise control reduces fuel economy on most cars is because it over-revs up hills, only to ride the brakes down the hill. You don't lose economy when you accelerate, rather you lose it when you brake and turn your car's kinetic energy into brake dust.

When I had my Civic, I used cruise control on flat terrain, but turned it off on hills. If you find that there is still a fuel economy loss on level ground, try using cruise control "conservatively" - turn it off for a while, and then turn it back on for a while when your foot gets tired.

I'm surprised that the CVT runs at higher RPMs on cruise control. Is this on level ground? Cruise control on a CVT will constantly adjust the RPMs, supposedly for maximum efficiency. On hills this causes the RPMs to rise, when in a standard car you would keep it in overdrive and slightly lose speed, or do a complete downshift to maintain it.
2006 New Formula Red Honda Insight MT, 267k: (Build thread)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2019, 11:43 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 152
Thanks: 42
Thanked 52 Times in 42 Posts
It sounds to me that the Kia's computer is not programmed for maximum fuel economy. That is strange.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2019, 01:28 PM   #4 (permalink)
Daox's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,032

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 58.68 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,355
Thanked 2,423 Times in 1,465 Posts
That is quite odd. From my experience the Mitsubishi Mirage keeps rpms lower than foot control, and the result is superior fuel economy.
Current project: Adding regenerative braking to the Mirage
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2019, 11:46 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Ecky's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,656

Gaptooth (retired) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.26 mpg (US)

Such Fit - '07 Honda Fit Sport
90 day: 41.27 mpg (US)

Connect - '15 Ford Transit Connect XL
90 day: 23.73 mpg (US)

K-sight - '00 Honda K-sight
90 day: 39.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,403
Thanked 1,526 Times in 967 Posts
In my work van (6 speed auto), cruise control almost always keeps the torque converter locked, whereas using my foot, the torque converter is often not. However, it will not always shift into a higher gear by itself. I can use paddle shifters to push it into 6th at 39mph while it won't automatically shift to 6th under most conditions until 45-48mph.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2019, 12:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
me and my metro's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 410

Economy Saturn - '02 Saturn L200
Thanks: 155
Thanked 123 Times in 103 Posts
I have a similar experience with automatics with cruise control. My previous Saturn L with the 2.2L four cylinder would not lock the converter at 60 mph with the cruise control on. The engine would run at 2600 rpm at 60 and cruise. Turn off the cruise and the converter would lock and the rpm would drop to 2300 rpm. This really affected the fuel mileage at that speed. On my commute using the cruise fuel mileage would drop from 30 to 28.

02 Saturn L200 5 speed
84 Gmc 6.5 na diesel K30 4x4
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com